A hybrid multiobjective evolutionary algorithm: Striking a balance with local search

This paper presents a hybrid multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (HMEA) that efficiently deals with multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs). The aim is to discover new nondominated solutions in the neighborhood of the most promising individuals in order to effectively push individuals toward the global Pareto front. It can be achieved by bringing the strength of an adaptive local search (ALS) to bear upon the evolutionary multiobjective optimization. The ALS is devised by combining a weighted fitness strategy and a knowledge-based local search which does not incur any significant computational cost. To be more exact, the highly converged and less crowded solutions selected in accordance with the weighted fitness values are improved by the local search, thereby helping multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MEAs) to economize on the search time and traverse the search space. Thus, the proposed HMEA that transplants the ALS to the framework of MEAs can achieve higher proximity and better diversity of nondominated solutions. To show the utility of HMEA, the ALS for multiobjective knapsack problems (MKPs) is developed by exploiting the problem's knowledge. Experimental results on the MKPs have provided evidence for its effectiveness as regards the proximity and the diversity performances.

[1]  D. Goldberg,et al.  BOA: the Bayesian optimization algorithm , 1999 .

[2]  Tomoyuki Hiroyasu,et al.  SPEA2+: Improving the Performance of the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 , 2004, PPSN.

[3]  Chang Wook Ahn,et al.  Advances in Evolutionary Algorithms: Theory, Design and Practice , 2006, Studies in Computational Intelligence.

[4]  Gary G. Yen,et al.  Dynamic multiobjective evolutionary algorithm: adaptive cell-based rank and density estimation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[5]  Jiri Ocenasek,et al.  Estimation of Distribution Algorithm for Mixed Continuous-Discrete Optimization , 2002 .

[6]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  Approximating the Set of Pareto-Optimal Solutions in Both the Decision and Objective Spaces by an Estimation of Distribution Algorithm , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[7]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[8]  Yong Wang,et al.  A regularity model-based multiobjective estimation of distribution algorithm with reducing redundant cluster operator , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  A Similarity-Based Mating Scheme for Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2003, GECCO.

[10]  Chang Wook Ahn,et al.  A diversity preserving selection in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms , 2010, Applied Intelligence.

[12]  Dirk Thierens,et al.  The balance between proximity and diversity in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[13]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  Hybrid Estimation of Distribution Algorithm for Multiobjective Knapsack Problem , 2004, EvoCOP.

[14]  Kwong-Sak Leung,et al.  Adaptive Elitist-Population Based Genetic Algorithm for Multimodal Function Optimization , 2003, GECCO.

[15]  Chang Wook Ahn,et al.  Multiobjective real-coded bayesian optimization algorithmrevisited: diversity preservation , 2007, GECCO '07.

[16]  Gary G. Yen,et al.  Rank-density-based multiobjective genetic algorithm and benchmark test function study , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[17]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION 1 RM-MEDA: A Regularity Model-Based Multiobjective Estimation of , 2022 .

[18]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  A multi-objective genetic local search algorithm and its application to flowshop scheduling , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[19]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[20]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  A Non-dominated Sorting Particle Swarm Optimizer for Multiobjective Optimization , 2003, GECCO.

[21]  Ujjwal Maulik,et al.  A Simulated Annealing-Based Multiobjective Optimization Algorithm: AMOSA , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[22]  Dirk Thierens,et al.  Multi-objective optimization with diversity preserving mixture-based iterated density estimation evolutionary algorithms , 2002, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[23]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  MULTI-OBJECTIVE FUNCTION OPTIMIZATION USING NON-DOMINATED SORTING GENETIC ALGORITHMS , 1994 .

[24]  Jonathan E. Fieldsend,et al.  Using unconstrained elite archives for multiobjective optimization , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[25]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Muiltiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms , 1994, Evolutionary Computation.

[26]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Real-Coded Bayesian Optimization Algorithm: Bringing the Strength of BOA into the Continuous World , 2004, GECCO.

[27]  Eckart Zitzler,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: methods and applications , 1999 .

[28]  Soon-Thiam Khu,et al.  An Investigation on Preference Order Ranking Scheme for Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[29]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[30]  Jun Chen,et al.  A Population Adaptive Based Immune Algorithm for Solving Multi-objective Optimization Problems , 2006, ICARIS.

[31]  Jiri Ocenasek,et al.  Parallel Estimation of Distribution Algorithms , 2010 .

[32]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Balance between genetic search and local search in memetic algorithms for multiobjective permutation flowshop scheduling , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[33]  Dirk Thierens,et al.  Advancing continuous IDEAs with mixture distributions and factorization selection metrics , 2001 .