ERP analysis of cognitive sequencing: a left anterior negativity related to structural transformation processing

A major objective of cognitive neuroscience is to identify those neurocomputational processes that may be shared by multiple cognitive functions vs those that are highly specific. This problem of identifying general vs specialized functions is of particular interest in the domain of language processing. Within this domain, event related brain potential (ERP) studies have demonstrated a left anterior negativity (LAN) in a range 300–700 ms, associated with syntactic processing, often linked to grammatical function words. These words have little or no semantic content, but rather play a role in encoding syntactic structure required for parsing. In the current study we test the hypothesis that the LAN reflects the operation of a more general sequence processing capability in which special symbols encode structural information that, when combined with past elements in the sequence, allows the prediction of successor elements. We recorded ERPs during a non-linguistic sequencing task that required subjects (n = 10) to process special symbols possessing the functional property defined above. When compared to ERPs in a control condition, function symbol processing elicits a left anterior negative shift between temporal and spatial characteristics quite similar to the LAN described during function word processing in language, supporting our hypothesis. These results are discussed in the context of related studies of syntactic and cognitive sequence processing.

[1]  A. Damasio,et al.  Brain and language. , 1993, Scientific American.

[2]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Electrophysiological Signatures of Visual Lexical Processing: Open-and Closed-Class Words , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  H. Neville,et al.  Fractionating language: different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  F Rösler,et al.  Processing of incongruous mental calculation problems: evidence for an arithmetic N400 effect. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[5]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[7]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Neural network processing of natural language: I. Sensitivity to serial, temporal and abstract structure of language in the infant , 2000 .

[9]  M. Kutas,et al.  Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Peter Ford Dominey.  An Anatomically Structured Sensory-Motor Sequence Learning System Displays Some General Linguistic Capacities , 1997, Brain and Language.

[11]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[12]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  On the Brain Response to Syntactic Anomalies: Manipulations of Word Position and Word Class Reveal Individual Differences , 1997, Brain and Language.

[13]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Nonlinguistic transformation processing in agrammatic aphasia , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[16]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE: Dissociable ERP profiles for processing rules vs instances in a cognitive sequencing task , 2000 .

[17]  M. Kutas,et al.  An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. , 1997, Psychophysiology.