A New Ultrasound Speckle Reduction Algorithm Based on Superpixel Segmentation and Detail Compensation

Speckle is a kind of noise commonly found in ultrasound images (UIs). Although traditional local operation-based methods, such as bilateral filtering, perform well in de-noising normal natural images with suitable parameters, these methods may break local correlations and, hence, their performance will be highly degraded when applied to UIs with high levels of speckle noise. In this work, we propose a new method, based on superpixel segmentation and detail compensation, to reduce UI speckle noise. In particular, considering that superpixel segmentation has the advantage of adhering accurately to the boundaries of objects or local structures, we propose a superpixel version of bilateral filtering to better protect the local structure during de-noising. Additionally, a human visual system (HVS)-inspired strategy for spatial compensation is introduced, in order to recover sophisticated edges as much as possible while weakening the high-frequency noise. Experiments on synthetic images and real UIs of different organs show that, compared to other methods, the proposed strategy can reduce ultrasound speckle noise more effectively.

[1]  R. Sivakumar,et al.  An extensive review on Despeckling of medical ultrasound images using various transformation techniques , 2018, Applied Acoustics.

[2]  Heung-No Lee,et al.  Speckle Reduction on Ultrasound Liver Images Based on a Sparse Representation over a Learned Dictionary , 2018, Applied Sciences.

[3]  Quan-Sen Sun,et al.  A spatially cohesive superpixel model for image noise level estimation , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[4]  Nelson D. A. Mascarenhas,et al.  Ultrasound Image Despeckling Using Stochastic Distance-Based BM3D , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Laurent Navarro,et al.  Hyperbolic Wavelet-Fisz Denoising for a Model Arising in Ultrasound Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging.

[6]  Jun Cheng,et al.  Superpixel-guided nonlocal means for image denoising and super-resolution , 2016, Signal Process..

[7]  Danni Ai,et al.  Local statistics and non-local mean filter for speckle noise reduction in medical ultrasound image , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[8]  Q. Guo,et al.  An Efficient SVD-Based Method for Image Denoising , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[9]  Shao-Bing Gao,et al.  A Retina Inspired Model for Enhancing Visibility of Hazy Images , 2015, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[10]  Herng-Hua Chang,et al.  Superpixel-based image noise variance estimation with local statistical assessment , 2015, EURASIP J. Image Video Process..

[11]  Kai-Fu Yang,et al.  Color Constancy Using Double-Opponency , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Xuming Zhang,et al.  Nonlocal means method using weight refining for despeckling of ultrasound images , 2014, Signal Process..

[13]  L. Shao,et al.  From Heuristic Optimization to Dictionary Learning: A Review and Comprehensive Comparison of Image Denoising Algorithms , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[14]  Tim Gollisch,et al.  Nonlinear Spatial Integration in the Receptive Field Surround of Retinal Ganglion Cells , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Tao Tang,et al.  Superpixel Generating Algorithm Based on Pixel Intensity and Location Similarity for SAR Image Classification , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[16]  Pascal Fua,et al.  SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  Li Xu,et al.  Structure extraction from texture via relative total variation , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[18]  R. Shapley,et al.  Color in the Cortex: single- and double-opponent cells , 2011, Vision Research.

[19]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Ultrasound Despeckling for Contrast Enhancement , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  Ling Zhang,et al.  Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images: A survey , 2015, Pattern Recognit..

[21]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Nonlocal Means-Based Speckle Filtering for Ultrasound Images , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[22]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  Ultrasound image segmentation: a survey , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[24]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[25]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[26]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[27]  Alexander A. Sawchuk,et al.  Adaptive restoration of images with speckle , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[28]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Digital Image Enhancement and Noise Filtering by Use of Local Statistics , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.