Ensemble trees learning based improved predictive maintenance using IIoT for turbofan engines

An unprecedented growth of the industrial sector, has led to an exponential increase in the amount of industrial IoT (IIoT) data. This is sprouting increased interest in the data-driven predictive maintenance (PDM) of the industrial equipments in cyber-physical systems (CPS). PDM is a prominent strategy which can achieve increased reliability and safety of CPS while attaining reduced maintenance cost by estimating the current health status and the remaining user life (RUL). In modern days, schedule-based airline maintenance does not consider prediction of faults in advance, which may result in undue maintenance situations where components are still kept in service even though they might have exceeded their defined limit of failure. Therefore, accurate degradation assessment and RUL prediction makes sense on dual fronts of guiding sensible decision-making regarding aviation safety and rational maintenance. To identify most crucial attributes and critical relationship among the attributes for fault detection of individual equipment(s) in the turbofan aircraft engine, We propose a predictive maintenance model using data-driven prognostic method for RUL estimation with multiple operating conditions. we capture increased insight using improved feature engineering and apply ensemble tree learning. Extensive experiments are performed on a widely used Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) C-MAPSS dataset. It is observed that Gradient Boosted Trees (GBT) with an accuracy of 93.91% performs better over Random Forest (RF) with 91.78% accuracy. However RF performed competitively with a much faster compute time in comparison to GBT.

[1]  Sina Sharif Mansouri,et al.  Remaining Useful Battery Life Prediction for UAVs based on Machine Learning , 2017 .

[2]  Kay Chen Tan,et al.  A time window neural network based framework for Remaining Useful Life estimation , 2016, 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[3]  F.O. Heimes,et al.  Recurrent neural networks for remaining useful life estimation , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management.

[4]  Donghua Zhou,et al.  Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Patrick D. T. O'Connor,et al.  Practical Reliability Engineering: O'Connor/Practical Reliability Engineering , 2011 .

[6]  Jianbo Yu,et al.  A similarity-based prognostics approach for Remaining Useful Life estimation of engineered systems , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management.

[7]  Jonathan S. Litt,et al.  User's Guide for the Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation (C-MAPSS) , 2007 .

[8]  David He,et al.  Using Deep Learning-Based Approach to Predict Remaining Useful Life of Rotating Components , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[9]  Rajkumar Roy,et al.  Overview of Remaining Useful Life Prediction Techniques in Through-life Engineering Services☆ , 2014 .

[10]  Byeng D. Youn,et al.  A generic probabilistic framework for structural health prognostics and uncertainty management , 2012 .

[11]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Steve G Burrow,et al.  Benefits Analysis of Prognostics & Health Monitoring to Aircraft Maintenance using System Dynamics , 2016 .

[13]  P. J. García Nieto,et al.  Hybrid PSO-SVM-based method for forecasting of the remaining useful life for aircraft engines and evaluation of its reliability , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Chetan Gupta,et al.  Long Short-Term Memory Network for Remaining Useful Life estimation , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM).

[15]  Xiaoli Li,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Network Based Regression Approach for Estimation of Remaining Useful Life , 2016, DASFAA.

[16]  Abhinav Saxena,et al.  Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management.

[17]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A dynamic particle filter-support vector regression method for reliability prediction , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Francisco Javier de Cos Juez,et al.  A hybrid ARIMA-SVM model for the study of the remaining useful life of aircraft engines , 2019, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[19]  Sandeep Kumar,et al.  A novel soft computing method for engine RUL prediction , 2017, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[20]  Jorge L. Romeu,et al.  Practical Reliability Engineering , 2003, Technometrics.

[21]  L. Peel,et al.  Data driven prognostics using a Kalman filter ensemble of neural network models , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management.

[22]  Yaguo Lei,et al.  A Model-Based Method for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Machinery , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[23]  Chen Yang,et al.  Data-driven hybrid remaining useful life estimation approach for spacecraft lithium-ion battery , 2017, Microelectron. Reliab..

[24]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation , 2011, ArXiv.

[25]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A comparison between extreme learning machine and artificial neural network for remaining useful life prediction , 2016, 2016 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Chengdu).

[26]  Kenli Li,et al.  A Parallel Random Forest Algorithm for Big Data in a Spark Cloud Computing Environment , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[27]  Éric Gaussier,et al.  A Probabilistic Interpretation of Precision, Recall and F-Score, with Implication for Evaluation , 2005, ECIR.

[28]  Jay Lee,et al.  Robust performance degradation assessment methods for enhanced rolling element bearing prognostics , 2003, Adv. Eng. Informatics.