Delay and interference comparison of CSMA and self-organizing TDMA when used in VANETs

IEEE 802.11p is the proposed wireless technology for communication between vehicles in a vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) aiming to increase road traffic safety. In a VANET, the network topology is constantly changing, which requires distributed self-organizing medium access control (MAC) algorithms, but more importantly the number of participating nodes cannot be restricted. This means that MAC algorithms with good scalability are needed, which can fulfill the concurrent requirements on delay and reliability from road traffic safety applications. The MAC method of IEEE 802.11p is a carrier sense multiple access (CSMA) scheme, which scales badly in terms of providing timely channel access for a high number of participating nodes. We therefore propose using another MAC method: self-organizing time division multiple access (STDMA) with which all nodes achieve timely channel access regardless of the number of participating nodes. We evaluate the performance of the two MAC methods in terms of the MAC-to-MAC delay, a measure which captures both the reliability and the delay of the delivered data traffic for a varying number of vehicles. The numerical results reveal that STDMA can support almost error-free transmission with a 100 ms deadline to all receivers within 100 m, while CSMA suffers from packet errors. Moreover, for all considered cases, STDMA offers better reliability than CSMA.

[1]  仲上 稔,et al.  The m-Distribution As the General Formula of Intensity Distribution of Rapid Fading , 1957 .

[2]  M. Nakagami The m-Distribution—A General Formula of Intensity Distribution of Rapid Fading , 1960 .

[3]  Lawrence G. Roberts,et al.  ALOHA packet system with and without slots and capture , 1975, CCRV.

[4]  A. Mann,et al.  A new concurrent slot assignment protocol for traffic information exchange , 1988, 38th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[5]  Bernhard Walke,et al.  DCAP, a decentral channel access protocol: performance analysis , 1991, [1991 Proceedings] 41st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[6]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[7]  A. M. Murray Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications , 1999 .

[8]  Ajay Chandra V. Gummalla,et al.  Wireless medium access control protocols , 2000, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[9]  Peter Graubmann,et al.  Tina: Its achievements and its future directions , 2000, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[10]  Antonio Capone,et al.  RR-ALOHA, a Reliable R-ALOHA broadcast channel for ad-hoc inter-vehicle communication networks , 2002 .

[11]  Raja Sengupta,et al.  Empirical determination of channel characteristics for DSRC vehicle-to-vehicle communication , 2004, VANET '04.

[12]  Flaminio Borgonovo,et al.  ADHOC MAC: New MAC Architecture for Ad Hoc Networks Providing Efficient and Reliable Point-to-Point and Broadcast Services , 2004, Wirel. Networks.

[13]  Fan Bai,et al.  Mobile Vehicle-to-Vehicle Narrow-Band Channel Measurement and Characterization of the 5.9 GHz Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) Frequency Band , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  N. Itoh,et al.  Advanced transmission cycle control scheme for autonomous decentralized TDMA protocol in safe driving support systems , 2008, 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[15]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  State of the art survey of wireless vehicular communication projects , 2008 .

[16]  Paolo Santi,et al.  Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication: Fair Transmit Power Control for Safety-Critical Information , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[17]  Timo Kosch,et al.  Communication architecture for cooperative systems in Europe , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[18]  Panagiotis Papadimitratos,et al.  Vehicular communication systems: Enabling technologies, applications, and future outlook on intelligent transportation , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[19]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  On the Ability of the 802.11p MAC Method and STDMA to Support Real-Time Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication , 2009, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[20]  Riccardo Scopigno,et al.  Mobile Slotted Aloha for Vanets , 2009, 2009 IEEE 70th Vehicular Technology Conference Fall.

[21]  Erik G. Strom,et al.  Scalability Issues of the MAC Methods STDMA and CSMA of IEEE 802.11p When Used in VANETs , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops.

[22]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  VANET: Vehicular Applications and Inter-Networking Technologies , 2010, VANET.

[23]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .