Requirements for query evaluation in weighted information retrieval

Abstract In this article, a general mathematical framework for information retrieval models is presented, giving more insight into the evaluation mechanisms that may be used in IR. In this framework a number of requirements for operators improving recall and precision are investigated. It is shown that these requirements can be satisfied by using descriptor weights and one combination operator only. Moreover, information items and queries—virtual items—can be treated in exactly the same way, reflecting the fact, that they both are descriptions of a number of concepts. Evaluation is performed by formulating similarity homomorphisms from query descriptions to retrieval status values that allow ranking items accordingly. For good comparisons, however, ranking must be done by the achieved proportion of perfect similarity rather than by similarity itself. In term independence models, this normalization process may satisfy the homomorphism requirement of algebra under certain conditions, but it contradicts the requirement in the term dependence case. Nevertheless, by demanding separability for the unnormalized part of the evaluation measure, it can be guaranteed that the query is evaluated to each item descriptor by descriptor, and the normalization value must be calculated only once for the whole query, using the query as a whole. Also, for each real item, the normalization value must have been calculated only once, using the item as a whole.

[1]  Donald H. Kraft,et al.  A model for a weighted retrieval system , 1981, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Research and Development in Information Retrieval , 1982, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  K. Mani Chandy,et al.  Current trends in programming methodology , 1977 .

[4]  Abraham Bookstein,et al.  A comparison of two weighting schemes for Boolean retrieval , 1980, SIGIR '80.

[5]  Abraham Bookstein,et al.  Explanation and Generalization of Vector Models in Information Retrieval , 1982, SIGIR.

[6]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Research Contributions , 2014 .

[7]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  On the nature of fuzz: A diatribe , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Donald H. Kraft,et al.  A mathematical model of a weighted boolean retrieval system , 1979, Inf. Process. Manag..

[9]  M. E. Maron,et al.  Probabilistic Approaches to the Document Retrieval Problem , 1982, SIGIR.

[10]  Martin Alfred Bärtschi Term dependence in information retrieval models , 1984 .

[11]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Dynamic information and library processing , 1975 .

[12]  Abraham Bookstein,et al.  Fuzzy requests: An approach to weighted boolean searches , 1980, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Vijay V. Raghavan,et al.  Experiments on the determination of the relationships between terms , 1979, ACM Trans. Database Syst..

[14]  Donald H. Kraft,et al.  Threshold values and Boolean retrieval systems , 1981, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  Stanley Burris,et al.  A course in universal algebra , 1981, Graduate texts in mathematics.

[16]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  The Unified Probabilistic Model for IR , 1982, SIGIR.