Crowding-in or crowding out: An empirical analysis on the effect of subsidies on individual willingness-to-pay for public transportation

Public transportation throughout the world is highly subsidized. User knowledge about public subsidies may affect their willingness to pay for public transport services and alter demand and related passenger fare revenues. This is especially relevant in view of the increasing availability of information about public subsidies. An empirical study reveals a crowding-in effect, on average, on WTP (willingness to pay) as a result of access to information about public subsidies that generates concerns of fairness. Crowding-out effects also occur, caused by considerations of double financing and free-riding, although they are minor. Study results show that public transportation companies as well as financing institutions should highlight the existence of subsidies to produce crowding-in effects in the WTP for public transportation, to maximize public valuation (WTP) of public transportation. This should increase self-generated revenues of public transportation services.

[1]  E. Fehr.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[2]  Justine S. Chang,et al.  Estimation of option and non-use values for intercity passenger rail services , 2010 .

[3]  Yves Croissant,et al.  On the perceived justice of urban road pricing: An empirical study in Lyon , 2012 .

[4]  Stefan Tscharaktschiew,et al.  Should Subsidies to Urban Passenger Transport be Increased? A Spatial CGE Analysis for a German Metropolitan Area , 2011 .

[5]  S. Proost,et al.  Optimal urban transport pricing in the presence of congestion, economies of density and costly public funds , 2008 .

[6]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[7]  Hernán Gonzalo-Orden,et al.  Relationship between service quality and demand for inter-urban buses , 2012 .

[8]  F. Webster,et al.  Effects of subsidies on urban public transport , 1980 .

[9]  Annica Kronsell.  Legitimacy for climate policies: politics and participation in the Green City of Freiburg , 2013 .

[10]  Christoph Ihl,et al.  Citizensourcing: Applying the Concept of Open Innovation to the Public Sector , 2010 .

[11]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Social Desirability Bias in Contingent Valuation Surveys Administered Through In-Person Interviews , 2003, Land Economics.

[12]  James Andreoni,et al.  Do Government Grants to Private Charities Crowd Out Giving or Fund-raising? , 2003 .

[13]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[14]  Martin Humphreys,et al.  The significance of indirect use and non-use values in transport appraisal , 2006 .

[15]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Effects of Perceived Fairness on Willingness to Pay , 2000 .

[16]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Random effects analysis , 2003 .

[17]  R. Chandrashekaran,et al.  Is There a Well-Defined Internal Reference Price? , 1995 .

[18]  G. Odekerken-Schröder,et al.  Investments in Consumer Relationships: A Cross-Country and Cross-Industry Exploration , 2001 .

[19]  M. Nieswand,et al.  Cost Efficiency and Subsidization in German Local Public Bus Transit , 2010 .

[20]  A. Matas,et al.  Demand and Revenue Implications of an Integrated Public Transport Policy: The Case of Madrid , 2004 .

[21]  J. Meyerhoff,et al.  To Pay or Not to Pay: Competing Theories to Explain Individuals’ Willingness to Pay for Public Environmental Goods , 2011 .

[22]  J. Schade,et al.  Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies , 2003 .

[23]  K. Small,et al.  Should Urban Transit Subsidies Be Reduced? , 2007 .

[24]  K. McConnell,et al.  Testing Temporal Reliability and Carry-over Effect: The Role of Correlated Responses in Test-retest Reliability Studies , 1998 .

[25]  K. B. Monroe.  Buyers’ Subjective Perceptions of Price , 1973 .

[26]  H. Mieg,et al.  The Impact of Perceived Justice on Contingent Value Judgments1 , 2007 .

[27]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  A META-ANALYSIS OF PRICE ELASTICITIES OF TRANSPORT DEMAND IN A GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM FRAMEWORK , 2002 .

[28]  Wanki Moon,et al.  Assessing holistic economic value for multifunctional agriculture in the US , 2011 .

[29]  P. S. Raju.  Product Familiarity, Brand Name, and Price Influences on Product Evaluation , 1977 .

[30]  Johan Holmgren,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Public Transport Demand , 2007 .

[31]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Application of attitude theory for improved predictive accuracy of stated preference methods in travel demand analysis , 2003 .

[32]  F. Borgonovi.  Do public grants to American theatres crowd-out private donations? , 2006 .

[33]  Janet L. Johnson,et al.  Do Charitable Donors Know Enough—and Care Enough—About Government Subsidies to Affect Private Giving to Nonprofit Organizations? , 2005 .

[34]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  The structure of motivation for contingent values: a case study of lake water quality improvement , 2004 .

[35]  Stefan Bratzel.  Conditions of success in sustainable urban transport policyPolicy change in 'relatively successful' European cities , 1999 .

[36]  Katherine N. Lemon,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Customers’ Usage of Services: Usage as an Antecedent and Consequence of Satisfaction , 1999 .

[37]  J. Raymond,et al.  Redistributive effects of subsidies to urban public transport in Spain , 2003 .

[38]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Do Satisfied Customers Really Pay More? A Study of the Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay , 2005 .

[39]  Ramon Munoz-Raskin,et al.  Affordability and Subsidies in Public Urban Transport: What Do We Mean, What Can Be Done? , 2008 .

[40]  M. Schreurs.  From the Bottom Up , 2008 .

[41]  J. E. Swan,et al.  Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: A field survey approach. , 1989 .

[42]  Bert Van Wee,et al.  Option Value of Public Transport: Methodology for Measurement and Case Study for Regional Rail Links in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[43]  J. Crompton,et al.  The Influence of Selected Behavioral and Economic Variables on Perceptions of Admission Price Levels , 2002 .

[44]  R. Kosenko,et al.  Buyer Market Price Knowledge Influence on Acceptable Price Range and Price Limits , 1988 .

[45]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Assessing systematic sources of variation in public transport elasticities: Some comparative warnings , 2008 .

[46]  Mari Rege,et al.  Does Public Policy Crowd Out Private Contributions to Public Goods? , 2001 .

[47]  J. M. Vassallo,et al.  Public Transport Funding Policy in Madrid: Is There Room for Improvement? , 2009 .

[48]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making public transport financially sustainable , 2011 .

[49]  René Bekkers,et al.  A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy , 2010 .

[50]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Stated Willingness to Pay for Public Goods: A Psychological Perspective , 1993 .

[51]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The social support for policy measures in passenger transport: a statistical analysis for the Netherlands , 1999 .

[52]  Ching-Fu Chen,et al.  Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers--The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement , 2011 .

[53]  Soobin Cho,et al.  A dichotomous choice survey for quantifying option and non-use values of bus services in Korea , 2012 .

[54]  Chris Nash,et al.  Transport Pricing Policy and the Research Agenda , 2005 .

[55]  A. Markstedt,et al.  Consequences of public ownership and subsidies for mass transit: Evidence from case studies and regression analysis , 1983 .

[56]  R. Buckley.  Pay to Play in Parks: An Australian Policy Perspective on Visitor Fees in Public Protected Areas , 2003 .

[57]  Markus Fellesson,et al.  Market Orientation in Public Transport Research—A Review , 2012 .

[58]  R. Oldfield,et al.  The effects of public transport subsidies on demand and supply , 1986 .

[59]  T. Brown,et al.  Evaluating the Validity of the Dichotomous Choice Question Format in Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[60]  J. Laird,et al.  Option and non-use values and rail project appraisal , 2009 .

[61]  Bhargab Maitra,et al.  Valuing Urban Bus Attributes: An Experience in Kolkata , 2006 .

[62]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Meta-analysis for Explaining the Variance in Public Transport Demand Elasticities in Europe , 1998 .

[63]  A. Brooks.  Public subsidies and charitable giving: Crowding out, crowding in, or both? , 2000 .

[64]  Peter H. Bloch,et al.  Correlates of Price Acceptability , 1988 .

[65]  J. Pucher,et al.  Sustainable Transport in Freiburg: Lessons from Germany's Environmental Capital , 2011 .

[66]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Anchoring Effects on Consumers' Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Accept , 2004 .

[67]  Peter Tisato.  Service unreliability and bus subsidy , 1998 .

[68]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Improving Validity Experiments of Contingent Valuation Methods: Results of Efforts to Reduce the Disparity of Hypothetical and Actual Willingness to Pay , 1996 .

[69]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Demand for Public Transport in Germany and the USA: An Analysis of Rider Characteristics , 2012 .

[70]  James Andreoni,et al.  An Experimental Test of the Public-Goods Crowding-Out Hypothesis , 1993 .