Towards Agility in IT Governance Frameworks

Digital transformation has changed corporate reality and, with that, firms’ IT environments and IT governance (ITG). As such, the perspective of ITG has shifted from the design of a relatively stable, closed and controllable system of a self-sufficient enterprise to a relatively fluid, open, agile and transformational system of networked co-adaptive entities. Related to this paradigm shift in ITG, this paper aims to clarify how the concept of an effective ITG framework has changed in terms of the demand for agility in organizations. Thus, this study conducted 33 qualitative interviews with executives and senior managers from the banking industry in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Analysis of the interviews focused on the formation of categories and the assignment of individual text parts (codings) to these categories to allow for a quantitative evaluation of the codings per category. Regarding traditional and agile ITG dimensions, 22 traditional and 25 agile dimensions were identified. Moreover, agile strategies within the agile ITG construct and ten ITG patterns were identified from the interview data. The data show relevant perspectives on the implementation of traditional and new ITG dimensions and highlight ambidextrous aspects in ITG frameworks.

[1]  R. Peterson.  Integration Strategies and Tactics for Information Technology Governance , 2004 .

[2]  Alexander Rossmann,et al.  The Impact of IT Governance on Firm Performance A Literature Review , 2017, PACIS.

[3]  Frank Schlosser,et al.  Mastering the Social IT/Business Alignment Challenge , 2012, AMCIS.

[4]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[5]  Steven De Haes,et al.  IT Governance Structures, Processes and Relational Mechanisms: Achieving IT/Business Alignment in a Major Belgian Financial Group , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Nicole Schadewitz,et al.  Comparing inductive and deductive methodologies for design patterns identification and articulation , 2007 .

[7]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal.  Organizational Adaptation and Environmental Selection-Interrelated Processes of Change , 1991 .

[9]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  State of the Art of Agile Governance: A Systematic Review , 2014, ArXiv.

[10]  W. V. Grembergen.  IT Governance and Its Mechanisms , 2004 .

[11]  D. Dunphy,et al.  Transformational and Coercive Strategies for Planned Organizational Change: Beyond the O.D. Model , 1988 .

[12]  D. Remenyi,et al.  Towards A Conceptual Map Of IT Governance: A Review Of Current Academic And Practitioner Thinking , 2009 .

[13]  John P. Kotter,et al.  Accelerate: Building Strategic Agility for a Faster-Moving World , 2014 .

[14]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[15]  Hsian-Ming Liu,et al.  Boosting firm performance via enterprise agility and network structure , 2012 .

[16]  R. Nagel,et al.  Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer , 1994 .

[17]  Steven De Haes,et al.  An Exploratory Study into IT Governance Implementations and its Impact on Business/IT Alignment , 2009, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[18]  E. Sloane,et al.  AGSOA - Agile Governance for Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Systems: A Methodology to Deliver 21st Century Military Net-Centric Systems of Systems , 2008, 2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[19]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[20]  Slinger Jansen,et al.  Controlling and monitoring agile software development in three dutch product software companies , 2009 .

[21]  Hermano Perrelli de Moura,et al.  Agile governance in Information and Communication Technologies: shifting paradigms , 2014, ArXiv.

[22]  Ann L. Fruhling,et al.  A Case Study: Introducing eXtreme Programming in a US Government System Development Project , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[23]  P. Weill,et al.  IT Governance , 2017 .

[24]  Malcolm Higgs,et al.  All changes great and small: Exploring approaches to change and its leadership , 2005 .

[25]  Claudia Cappelli,et al.  Evaluation of a Maturity Model for Agile Governance in ICT using Focus Group , 2015, SBSI.

[26]  Vanessa Chang,et al.  Adoption and implementation of IT governance: cases from Australian higher education , 2006 .

[27]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[28]  Cynthia Carroll.  The CEO of Anglo American on getting serious about safety. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[29]  A. Haider,et al.  The impacts of IT governance implementation: A case study on banking industry in Thailand , 2013, 2013 Proceedings of PICMET '13: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (PICMET).

[30]  Jerry N. Luftman,et al.  Transforming the Enterprise: The Alignment of Business and Information Technology Strategies , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[31]  Asif Qumer.  Defining an integrated agile governance for large agile software development environments , 2007 .

[32]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students (5th edn) , 2007 .

[33]  Miguel Mira da Silva,et al.  IT Governance Mechanisms: A Literature Review , 2013, IESS.

[34]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[35]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[36]  L. Greiner.  Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow , 1997 .

[37]  Fauziah Baharom,et al.  Content analysis on agile values: A perception from software practitioners , 2011, 2011 Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering.

[38]  C. Markides,et al.  Competing with dual business models: A contingency approach , 2004 .

[39]  C. Gersick.  REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[40]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes , 2007 .

[41]  João M. Fernandes,et al.  Classification and Comparison of Agile Methods , 2010, 2010 Seventh International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology.

[42]  Steven De Haes,et al.  Enterprise Governance of Information Technology: Achieving Alignment and Value, Featuring COBIT 5 , 2015 .

[43]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  E-Business Strategy, Sourcing and Governance , 2005 .

[44]  Peter Weill,et al.  Don't Just Lead, Govern: How Top-Performing Firms Govern IT , 2004, MIS Q. Executive.

[45]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  GAME: Governance for Agile Management of Enterprises: A Management Model for Agile Governance , 2013, 2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Workshops.

[46]  C. Markides.  Business Model Innovation: What Can the Ambidexterity Literature Teach US? , 2013 .

[47]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .