Risk assessment of pesticide spray drift from citrus applications with air-blast sprayers in Spain

Abstract There have been no previous risk assessment studies on citrus pesticides in Spain. The aim of this work was to estimate the risks caused by worst-case drift scenarios of the principal pesticides used on the crop, assessing possible damage to the environment and human health. A field survey was carried out, characterizing the specific conditions of plant protection product applications to citrus crops in Spain. Six targets were identified as being the most affected by droplet spray drift in Spain, and more broadly in most Mediterranean conditions: aquatic organisms, earthworms, bees, adult bystanders, child bystanders and residents. Three drift estimation models were used to assess the amount of drift at specific distances downwind of a field in order to calculate Risk Indicators. These showed safe conditions for earthworms and residents, but also indicated that some pesticides may pose a risk to aquatic organisms, even with a 20 m buffer zone, and also to bees, and adult and child bystanders. In general, results generated similar consequences of hazard risk independent of the drift prediction model used, indicating that toxicological data are more relevant for predicting risks.

[1]  M. C. Butler Ellis,et al.  Bystander exposure to pesticide spray drift: new data for model development and validation. , 2010 .

[2]  Carbonell,et al.  Ecological risk assessment of pesticides in the Mediterranean region. The need for crop-specific scenarios , 2000, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  C. Yi,et al.  Momentum Transfer within Canopies , 2008 .

[4]  H. W. Thistle,et al.  THE ROLE OF STABILITY IN FINE PESTICIDE DROPLET DISPERSION IN THE ATMOSPHERE: A REVIEW OF PHYSICAL CONCEPTS , 2000 .

[5]  Bart Nicolai,et al.  A new integrated CFD modelling approach towards air-assisted orchard spraying. Part I. Model development and effect of wind speed and direction on sprayer airflow , 2010 .

[6]  P. J. Walklate,et al.  A simulation study of pesticide drift from an air-assisted orchard sprayer , 1992 .

[7]  M. Yost,et al.  The Washington aerial spray drift study: Modeling pesticide spray drift deposition from an aerial application , 2005 .

[8]  Walter Steurbaut,et al.  POCER, the pesticide occupational and environmental risk indicator , 2002 .

[9]  S. Belcher,et al.  Adjustment of a turbulent boundary layer to a canopy of roughness elements , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  MODELING OF SPRAY PENETRATION AND DEPOSITION ON CITRUS TREE CANOPIES , 2004 .

[11]  Arthur da Silva,et al.  A lagrangian model for spray behaviour within vine canopies , 2006 .

[12]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Drift from Field Crop Sprayers Using an Integrated Approach: Results of a Five-Year Study , 2011 .

[13]  E. Capri,et al.  Studies on pesticide spray drift in a Mediterranean citrus area , 2003 .

[14]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  Spray Drift From Ground and Aerial Applications , 1992 .

[15]  C. Sinfort,et al.  Emission of pesticides to the air during sprayer application: A bibliographic review , 2005 .

[17]  Yves Brunet,et al.  Atmospheric loss of pesticides above an artificial vineyard during air-assisted spraying , 2007 .

[18]  H. Thompson.  Behavioural Effects of Pesticides in Bees–Their Potential for Use in Risk Assessment , 2003, Ecotoxicology.

[19]  J. Valle-Mora,et al.  Comparative ecological risks of pesticides used in plantation production of papaya: application of the SYNOPS indicator. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Devanand Maski,et al.  Effects of charging voltage, application speed, target height, and orientation upon charged spray deposition on leaf abaxial and adaxial surfaces , 2010 .

[21]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  Mass Balance of Citrus Spray Applications , 2007 .

[22]  C. Stainier,et al.  Droplet size spectra and drift effect of two phenmedipham formulations and four adjuvants mixtures , 2006 .

[23]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Effects on pesticide spray drift of the physicochemical properties of the spray liquid , 2009, Precision Agriculture.

[24]  Pieter Spanoghe,et al.  Risk assessment of pesticide spray drift damage in Belgium , 2007 .

[25]  J. Vlaming,et al.  Hair 2010 Documentation: Calculating risk indicators related to agricultural use of pesticides within the European Union , 2011 .

[26]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  SPRAY PENETRATION INTO THE CITRUS TREE CANOPY FROM TWO AIR–CARRIER SPRAYERS , 2002 .

[27]  Magnus Wang,et al.  A simple probabilistic estimation of spray drift—factors determining spray drift and development of a model , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[28]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  Coverage and Drift Produced by Air Induction and Conventional Hydraulic Nozzles Used for Orchard Applications , 2000 .

[29]  H. Holterman.  Kinetics and evaporation of water drops in air , 2003 .

[30]  W. E. Steinke,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY EFFECTS ON PESTICIDE DRIFT FROM AN IRRIGATED ORCHARD , 2000 .

[31]  F. Paumgartten,et al.  Comparative study on the susceptibility of freshwater species to copper-based pesticides. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[32]  P. Verboven,et al.  Modelling and validation of the air flow generated by a cross flow air sprayer as affected by travel speed and fan speed , 2005 .