Responses of DCN-PVCN neurons and auditory nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats to AM and pure tones: Analysis with autocorrelation/power-spectrum

We investigated amplitude-modulated (AM) tone encoding behavior of dorsal and posteroventral cochlear-nucleus (DCN and PVCN) neurons and auditory nerve (AN) fibers in decerebrate unanesthetized cats. Some of the modulation transfer functions (MTFs) were narrowly-tuned band-pass functions; these included responses at moderate and high stimulus levels of DCN pause/build-type-III neurons and the following types of DCN and PVCN chopper neurons: chop-S and/or chop-type-I/III. Other MTFs were broad low-pass or complex functions. Chop-T neurons of the DCN and PVCN tended to exhibit low-pass or flat MTFs. The band-pass MTF neurons exhibited intrinsic oscillations (IOs) in responses to AM or pure tones. The IOs, which were detected in autocorrelation functions and power spectra, were closely correlated (r = 0.863) with the best envelope frequency (BEF). All of the AN fibers showed broad low-pass MTFs with some showing a rudimentary peak in the MTF. The MTFs of DCN-PVCN neurons and AN fibers showed, respectively: (1) BEFs ranging 50-500 Hz, and 400-1300 Hz; (2) upper cut-off frequencies ranging 200-1200 Hz, and 1600-3200 Hz. At stimulus levels of 60-85 dB SPL, maximum modulation gains were as high as 12 dB for DCN-PVCN neurons but were limited to below about 0 dB for AN fibers. The median dynamic ranges of DCN and PVCN neurons (51 and 42 dB, respectively) were substantially wider than those of the low and high spontaneous rate AN fibers (30 and 31 dB, respectively). The observation of higher modulation gain, wider dynamic range, and more narrowly-tuned MTF of DCN-PVCN neurons than AN fibers supports the concept that the capabilities to encode dynamic signals are enhanced in DCN-PVCN neurons compared with AN fibers.

[1]  E. Javel Coding of AM tones in the chinchilla auditory nerve: implications for the pitch of complex tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  P. Groves,et al.  Slow rhythms and correlations in spike trains from midbrain neurons , 1975, Experimental Neurology.

[3]  Robert D. Frisina Enhancement of responses to amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: Single‐unit recordings using an improved surgical approach , 1984 .

[4]  Graeme K. Yates,et al.  Modulation transfer function of efferent neurones in the guinea pig cochlea , 1988, Hearing Research.

[5]  A. Møller Dynamic properties of primary auditory fibers compared with cells in the cochlear nucleus. , 1976, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[6]  E D Young,et al.  Excitatory/inhibitory response types in the cochlear nucleus: relationships to discharge patterns and responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. II. Topographical organization. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Structural and functional properties distinguish two types of multipolar cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  A. Møller,et al.  Coding of amplitude and frequency modulated sounds in the cochlear nucleus of the rat. , 1972, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[10]  D O Kim,et al.  Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  T J Glattke Unit responses of the cat cochlear nucleus to amplitude-modulated stimuli. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  D O Kim,et al.  A population study of cochlear nerve fibers: comparison of spatial distributions of average-rate and phase-locking measures of responses to single tones. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Response modulation of auditory-nerve fibers by am stimuli: effects of average intensity , 1980, Hearing Research.

[15]  Terrance Raymond Bourk,et al.  Electrical responses of neural units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat , 1976 .

[16]  N. Cant,et al.  The fine structure of two types of stellate cells in the anterior division of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat , 1981, Neuroscience.

[17]  D O Kim,et al.  A population study of auditory-nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats: response to pure tones. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  A R Moller,et al.  The use of correlation analysis in processing neuroelectric data. , 1970, Progress in brain research.

[19]  S. Khanna,et al.  Spectral characteristics of the responses of primary auditory-nerve fibers to frequency-modulated signals , 1989, Hearing Research.

[20]  R. W. Rodieck Maintained activity of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  M. Liberman,et al.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  W. Shofner,et al.  Regularity and latency of units in ventral cochlear nucleus: implications for unit classification and generation of response properties. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Aage R. Møller CODING OF AMPLITUDE MODULATED SOUNDS IN THE COCHLEAR NUCLEUS OF THE RAT , 1973 .

[25]  G L Gerstein,et al.  Response of cat cochlear nucleus neurons to frequency and amplitude modulated tones. , 1972, Brain research.