Mechanistic studies of a protonolytic organomercurial cleaving enzyme: bacterial organomercurial lyase.

Mechanistic studies of the protonolytic carbon-mercury bond cleavage by organomercurial lyase from Escherichia coli (R831) suggest that the reaction proceeds via an SE2 pathway. Studies with stereochemically defined substrates cis-2-butenyl-2-mercuric chloride (1) and endo-norbornyl-2-mercuric bromide (2) reveal that a high degree of configurational retention occurs during the bond cleavage, while studies with exo-3-acetoxynortricyclyl-5-mercuric bromide (3) and cis-exo-2-acetoxy-bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-enyl-3-mercuric bromide (4) show that the protonolysis proceeds without accompanying skeletal rearrangement. Kinetic data for the enzymatic reactions of cis-2-butenyl-2-mercuric chloride (1) and trans-1-propenyl-1-mercuric chloride (6) indicate that these substrates show enhanced reaction rates of ca. 10-200-fold over alkylvinylmercurials and unsubstituted vinylmercurials, suggesting that the olefinic methyl substituent may stabilize an intermediate bearing some positive charge. Enzymatic reaction of 2-butenyl-1-mercuric bromide (5) yields a 72/23/5 mixture of 1-butene/trans-2-butene/cis-2-butene, indicative of intervening SE2' cleavage. The observation of significant solvent deuterium isotope effects at pH 7.4 of Vmax (H2O)/Vmax(D2O) = 2.1 for cis-2-butenyl-2-mercuric chloride (1) turnover and Vmax(H2O)/Vmax(D2O) = 4.9 for ethylmercuric chloride turnover provides additional support for a kinetically important proton delivery. Finally, the stoichiometric formation of butene and Hg(II) from 1 and methane and Hg(II) from methylmercuric chloride eliminates the possibility of an SN1 solvolytic mechanism. As the first well-characterized enzymatic reaction of an organometallic substrate and the first example of an enzyme-mediated SE2 reaction the organomercurial lyase catalyzed carbon-mercury bond cleavage provides an arena for investigating novel enzyme structure-function relationships.

[1]  N. Brown.  Bacterial resistance to mercury — reductio ad absurdum? , 1985 .

[2]  A. Summers.  Bacterial resistance to toxic elements , 1985 .

[3]  S. Silver,et al.  Bacterial resistance and detoxification of heavy metals , 1984 .

[4]  C. Walsh,et al.  Mechanistic studies with deuterated dihydroorotates on the dihydroorotate oxidase from Crithidia fasciculata. , 1984, Biochemistry.

[5]  D. Rabenstein,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of the solution chemistry of metal complexes. 20. Ligand-exchange kinetics of methylmercury(II)-thiol complexes , 1984 .

[6]  C. Walsh,et al.  Mercuric reductase: homology to glutathione reductase and lipoamide dehydrogenase. Iodoacetamide alkylation and sequence of the active site peptide. , 1983, Biochemistry.

[7]  F. R. Jensen,et al.  Mechanisms of SE2 reactions: emphasis on organotin compounds , 1983 .

[8]  C. Walsh,et al.  Mercuric reductase. Purification and characterization of a transposon-encoded flavoprotein containing an oxidation-reduction-active disulfide. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  F. R. Jensen,et al.  MECHANISM IN ELECTROPHILIC ALIPHATIC SUBSTITUTION: A KINETIC AND STEREOCHEMICAL STUDY OF BROMODEMERCURATION WITH BROMIDE ION CATALYSIS , 1979 .

[10]  J. Schottel.  The mercuric and organomercurial detoxifying enzymes from a plasmid-bearing strain of Escherichia coli. , 1978, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  N. Purdie,et al.  Kinetic studies of complexation of divalent strontium, barium, lead and mercury cations by aqueous 15-crown-5 and 18-crown-6 , 1978 .

[12]  S. Silver,et al.  Microbial transformations of metals. , 1978, Annual review of microbiology.

[13]  T. Suzuki,et al.  Biotransformation of methylmercury in vitro. , 1976, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  W. A. Nugent,et al.  Electrophilic substitution at saturated carbon in mercurials. Alkyl ligands as mechanistic probes in the cleavage of organometals , 1976 .

[15]  G. Kabalka,et al.  Consistent inversion in the base-induced reaction of iodine with organoboranes. A convenient procedure for the synthesis of optically active iodides , 1976 .

[16]  H. Kuivila,et al.  Electrophilic displacement reactions. XVII. Course and kinetics of the protonolysis of allyltins , 1975 .

[17]  A. Carty,et al.  THE INTERACTION OF ORGANOMERCURY POLLUTANTS WITH BIOLOGICALLY IMPUTANT SITES, AN X‐RAY STUDY OF THE 2 TO 1‐COMPLEX BETWEEN METHYLMERCURY AND PENICILLAMINE , 1973 .

[18]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Inversion of configuration in the bromination of vinylic mercurials , 1973 .

[19]  F. R. Jensen,et al.  Bridged polycyclic of University of Colorado group. LXXV. Reduction of organomercurials. Stereospecific replacement of mercury by deuterium , 1972 .

[20]  R. Larock,et al.  Reaction of 2-alkenyl-1,3,2-benzodioxaboroles with mercuric acetate. Convenient stereospecific procedure for the conversion of alkynes into alkenylmercuric salts , 1972 .

[21]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Mechanism of reduction of alkylmercuric halides by metal hydrides , 1970 .

[22]  T Norseth,et al.  Biotransformation of methylmercury salts in the rat studied by specific determination of inorganic mercury. , 1970, Biochemical pharmacology.

[23]  D. Carlsson,et al.  Kinetics and rate constants for the reduction of alkyl halides by organotin hydrides , 1968 .

[24]  J. Kerr.  Bond Dissociation Energies by Kinetic Methods , 1966 .

[25]  W. Kayser,et al.  The Acid Cleavage of Allylmercuric Iodide , 1966 .

[26]  Z. Rappoport,et al.  Allylic oxidation of olefins by mercuric acetate , 1972 .

[27]  M. Eigen,et al.  The Kinetics and Mechanism of Formation of Metal Complexes , 1965 .

[28]  H. A. Skinner.  The Strengths of Metal-to-Carbon Bonds , 1965 .

[29]  M. M. Kreevoy,et al.  The Reaction of Vinylmercuric Iodide with Nonhalogen Acid , 1964 .

[30]  S. Winstein,et al.  Electrophilic and Nucleophilic Substitution of Allylic Mercurials , 1963 .

[31]  R. H. Schuler,et al.  ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE STUDIES OF TRANSIENT ALKYL RADICALS , 1963 .

[32]  F. R. Jensen,et al.  Phenyl Participation in the Solvolysis of Organomercurials , 1963 .

[33]  F. R. Jensen,et al.  The Effect of Structure and Solvent on the Rates of Demercurization. Rehybridization of Leaving Group as an Important Factor in Solvolysis Reactions , 1963 .

[34]  W. Seifert,et al.  Bridged Polycyclic Compounds. XIX. Some Addition and Solvolysis Reactions in Norbornane Systems , 1962 .

[35]  D. Foster,et al.  Organomercury Chemistry. Decomposition of Alkenylmercury Compounds , 1962 .

[36]  F. R. Jensen,et al.  ORGANOMERCURIALS. VIII. MERCURY AS THE LEAVING GROUP IN SOLVOLYSIS REACTIONS1 , 1961 .

[37]  F. R. Jensen,et al.  ORGANOMERCURIALS. IX. THE NATURE OF THE CARBONIUM IONS FORMED IN THE SOLVOLYSIS OF ORGANOMERCURIALS1 , 1961 .

[38]  M. M. Kreevoy,et al.  The Reaction of Alkylmercuric Iodides with Non-halogen Acid1a , 1961 .

[39]  F. R. Jensen,et al.  Isomers for Electrophilic Studies. Resolution of 2-Bromomercuributane, Assignment of Configuration and Cleavage of the Enantiomorphs by Bromine1-13 , 1960 .

[40]  F. R. Jensen.  The Stereochemistry of the Cleavage of Di-sec-butylmercury by Mercuric Bromide1-4 , 1960 .

[41]  F. R. Jensen,et al.  ELECTROPHILIC ALIPHATIC SUBSTITUTION. II. RESOLUTION AND STEREOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF sec-BUTYLMERCURY COMPOUNDS1 , 1959 .

[42]  M. M. Kreevoy.  Acid Cleavage of Methylmercuric Iodide , 1957 .