Evaluating Performance of Microwave Image Reconstruction Algorithms: Extracting Tissue Types with Segmentation Using Machine Learning

Evaluating the quality of reconstructed images requires consistent approaches to extracting information and applying metrics. Partitioning medical images into tissue types permits the quantitative assessment of regions that contain a specific tissue. The assessment facilitates the evaluation of an imaging algorithm in terms of its ability to reconstruct the properties of various tissue types and identify anomalies. Microwave tomography is an imaging modality that is model-based and reconstructs an approximation of the actual internal spatial distribution of the dielectric properties of a breast over a reconstruction model consisting of discrete elements. The breast tissue types are characterized by their dielectric properties, so the complex permittivity profile that is reconstructed may be used to distinguish different tissue types. This manuscript presents a robust and flexible medical image segmentation technique to partition microwave breast images into tissue types in order to facilitate the evaluation of image quality. The approach combines an unsupervised machine learning method with statistical techniques. The key advantage for using the algorithm over other approaches, such as a threshold-based segmentation method, is that it supports this quantitative analysis without prior assumptions such as knowledge of the expected dielectric property values that characterize each tissue type. Moreover, it can be used for scenarios where there is a scarcity of data available for supervised learning. Microwave images are formed by solving an inverse scattering problem that is severely ill-posed, which has a significant impact on image quality. A number of strategies have been developed to alleviate the ill-posedness of the inverse scattering problem. The degree of success of each strategy varies, leading to reconstructions that have a wide range of image quality. A requirement for the segmentation technique is the ability to partition tissue types over a range of image qualities, which is demonstrated in the first part of the paper. The segmentation of images into regions of interest corresponding to various tissue types leads to the decomposition of the breast interior into disjoint tissue masks. An array of region and distance-based metrics are applied to compare masks extracted from reconstructed images and ground truth models. The quantitative results reveal the accuracy with which the geometric and dielectric properties are reconstructed. The incorporation of the segmentation that results in a framework that effectively furnishes the quantitative assessment of regions that contain a specific tissue is also demonstrated. The algorithm is applied to reconstructed microwave images derived from breasts with various densities and tissue distributions to demonstrate the flexibility of the algorithm and that it is not data-specific. The potential for using the algorithm to assist in diagnosis is exhibited with a tumor tracking example. This example also establishes the usefulness of the approach in evaluating the performance of the reconstruction algorithm in terms of its sensitivity and specificity to malignant tissue and its ability to accurately reconstruct malignant tissue.

[1]  Barry D. Van Veen,et al.  A 3-D Level Set Method for Microwave Breast Imaging , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Soon-Ik Jeon,et al.  Clinical trial of Microwave Tomography imaging , 2016, 2016 URSI Asia-Pacific Radio Science Conference (URSI AP-RASC).

[3]  S. Digumarthy,et al.  Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology , 2007, Nature.

[4]  Joe LoVetri,et al.  Integrating prior information into microwave tomography part 2: Impact of errors in prior information on microwave tomography image quality , 2017, Medical physics.

[5]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  A modified Hausdorff distance for object matching , 1994, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[6]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Initial clinical experience with microwave breast imaging in women with normal mammography. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[7]  Joe LoVetri,et al.  Modeling Error and Calibration Techniques for a Faceted Metallic Chamber for Magnetic Field Microwave Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[8]  Matthew B. Blaschko,et al.  On Hausdorff Distance Measures , 2004 .

[9]  C. Gilmore,et al.  Finite-element contrast source inversion method for microwave imaging , 2010 .

[10]  Minghuan Fu,et al.  Dielectric properties for non‐invasive detection of normal, benign, and malignant breast tissues using microwave theories , 2018, Thoracic cancer.

[11]  Chiang Ching Shan Microwave Imaging , 1979, 1979 9th European Microwave Conference.

[12]  Maurizio Bozzi,et al.  Dielectric Properties Characterization From 0.5 to 50 GHz of Breast Cancer Tissues , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[13]  L. H. Miller Table of Percentage Points of Kolmogorov Statistics , 1956 .

[14]  Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al.  k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding , 2007, SODA '07.

[15]  M. Lindstrom,et al.  A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal breast tissue obtained from reduction surgeries , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Joe LoVetri,et al.  Proof-of-Concept of the Incorporation of Ultrasound-Derived Structural Information Into Microwave Radar Imaging , 2018, IEEE Journal on Multiscale and Multiphysics Computational Techniques.

[17]  Paul M. Meaney,et al.  A clinical prototype for active microwave imaging of the breast , 2000 .

[18]  J. D. Shea,et al.  Three-dimensional microwave imaging of realistic numerical breast phantoms via a multiple-frequency inverse scattering technique. , 2010, Medical physics.

[19]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic , 2000 .

[20]  Takamaro Kikkawa,et al.  Complex permittivities of breast tumor tissues obtained from cancer surgeries , 2014 .

[21]  Joe LoVetri,et al.  Novel Stopping Criteria for Optimization-Based Microwave Breast Imaging Algorithms , 2019, J. Imaging.

[22]  Elise C. Fear,et al.  Automated 3D method for the construction of flexible and reconfigurable numerical breast models from MRI scans , 2017, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[23]  E. Fear,et al.  Regional estimation of the dielectric properties of inhomogeneous objects using near-field reflection data , 2012 .

[24]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[25]  E. Fear,et al.  Incorporation of Ultrasonic Prior Information for Improving Quantitative Microwave Imaging of Breast , 2019, IEEE Journal on Multiscale and Multiphysics Computational Techniques.

[26]  R. L. Thorndike Who belongs in the family? , 1953 .

[27]  Andreas Fhager,et al.  Reconstruction Quality and Spectral Content of an Electromagnetic Time-Domain Inversion Algorithm , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  J. Lovetri,et al.  An Experimental Phantom Study for Air-Based Quasi-Resonant Microwave Breast Imaging , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[29]  Joe LoVetri,et al.  Integrating prior information into microwave tomography Part 1: Impact of detail on image quality , 2017, Medical physics.

[30]  Panagiotis Kosmas,et al.  Multiple-Frequency DBIM-TwIST Algorithm for Microwave Breast Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[31]  Paul M. Meaney,et al.  Fast 3-D Tomographic Microwave Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  R. Scapaticci,et al.  Wavelet-Based Adaptive Multiresolution Inversion for Quantitative Microwave Imaging of Breast Tissues , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[33]  V. Thada,et al.  Comparison of Jaccard, Dice, Cosine Similarity Coefficient To Find Best Fitness Value for Web Retrieved Documents Using Genetic Algorithm , 2013 .

[34]  Luca P. Carloni,et al.  A low-cost, fast, and accurate microwave imaging system for breast cancer detection , 2015, 2015 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS).

[35]  M. Hussein,et al.  Breast cancer cells exhibits specific dielectric signature in vitro using the open-ended coaxial probe technique from 200 MHz to 13.6 GHz , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[36]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Introduction to Information Retrieval , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[37]  Amir H. Golnabi,et al.  Tomographic Microwave Imaging With Incorporated Prior Spatial Information , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[38]  Elise Fear,et al.  Anthropomorphic breast model repository for research and development of microwave breast imaging technologies , 2018, Scientific Data.

[39]  Keith D Paulsen,et al.  Pre-scaled two-parameter Gauss-Newton image reconstruction to reduce property recovery imbalance. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  Joe LoVetri,et al.  Microwave Imaging of Human Forearms: Pilot Study and Image Enhancement , 2013, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[41]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Nonlinear Microwave Imaging for Breast-Cancer Screening Using Gauss–Newton's Method and the CGLS Inversion Algorithm , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[42]  Jeremie Bourqui,et al.  Surface Estimation for Microwave Imaging , 2017, Sensors.

[43]  Barry D. Van Veen,et al.  Development of Anatomically Realistic Numerical Breast Phantoms With Accurate Dielectric Properties for Modeling Microwave Interactions With the Human Breast , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  M. Lindstrom,et al.  A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[45]  Soon-Ik Jeon,et al.  Preclinical Prototype Development of a Microwave Tomography System for Breast Cancer Detection , 2010 .

[46]  Mark D. Johnson,et al.  Liquid biopsy using the nanotube-CTC-chip: capture of invasive CTCs with high purity using preferential adherence in breast cancer patients. , 2019, Lab on a chip.

[47]  F. Massey The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .

[48]  S. Rai,et al.  Static micro-array isolation, dynamic time series classification, capture and enumeration of spiked breast cancer cells in blood: the nanotube–CTC chip , 2016, Nanotechnology.

[49]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .

[50]  J. LoVetri,et al.  Estimation and Use of Prior Information in FEM-CSI for Biomedical Microwave Tomography , 2012, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[51]  Keith D Paulsen,et al.  Microwave imaging for neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: initial clinical experience , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[52]  E. Fear,et al.  Defining regions of interest for microwave imaging using near-field reflection data , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[53]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  A Microeconomic View of Data Mining , 1998, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[54]  Joe LoVetri,et al.  Breast Imaging Using Microwave Tomography with Radar-Based Tissue-Regions Estimation , 2014 .

[55]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[56]  Michael Randolph Garey,et al.  The complexity of the generalized Lloyd - Max problem , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[57]  Matteo Pastorino,et al.  Preliminary test of a prototype of microwave axial tomograph for medical applications , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings.

[58]  Emanuele Trucco,et al.  Computer and Robot Vision , 1995 .

[59]  E. Fear,et al.  Tissue-Type Imaging for Ultrasound-Prior Microwave Inversion , 2018, 2018 18th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM).

[60]  MWSegEval—An image analysis toolbox for microwave breast images , 2021, SoftwareX.

[61]  E. Fear,et al.  Technique to Decompose Near-Field Reflection Data Generated From an Object Consisting of Thin Dielectric Layers , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[62]  T. Isernia,et al.  Biomedical imaging via wavelet-based regularization and distorted iterated virtual experiments , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA).