An Inspiration from Border Crossing: Principle of Boundary Activity for Integrating Learning in the Formal and Informal Spaces

With the recognition of the value of learning in informal spaces, it has been proposed that learning in the informal spaces should be an integral part of the formal schooling. The ubiquitous use of mobile technology creates various opportunities for connecting learning in the formal and informal contexts. In seamless learning, different efforts have been devoted to improving the synergy of these two learning contexts supported by mobile technology, but challenges still exist in the design of seamless learning scenarios that involve the pedagogical integration of learning in formal and informal spaces with active boundary interaction. To promote the mutual interaction of learning contexts in seamless learning, and improve the smooth transformation of students’ cognition in crossing borders, we elaborate on the conception of “boundary object” which is borrowed from science education and learning sciences and inspired by the notion of border crossing from the cultural perspectives, as the knot for tightening learning in different contexts. In this chapter, we will summarize the origins of the boundary objects and discuss their application in improving the boundary interactions in seamless learning. Based on these, the principle of boundary activity-based learning (BABL) is articulated for improving the design of seamless learning activities. A BABL lesson exemplar is illustrated for BABL application, and the initial results of a pilot study are discussed. The BABL principle and the research will inform the pedagogical design of technology-supported STEM education and science learning in a seamless learning context.

[1]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[2]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[3]  Louise Starkey,et al.  Evaluating learning in the 21st century: a digital age learning matrix , 2011 .

[4]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Marco Kalz,et al.  A review of the types of mobile activities in mobile inquiry-based learning , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[6]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  MODELS AND DISCOURSE : A PRIMARY SCHOOL SCIENCE CLASS VISIT TO A MUSEUM , 1997 .

[7]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[8]  Alexandra Beatty,et al.  Successful STEM Education: A Workshop Summary , 2014 .

[9]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Challenges in designing seamless-learning scenarios: affective and emotional effects on external representations , 2011, Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organisation.

[10]  Yanjie Song,et al.  Fostering personalized learning in science inquiry supported by mobile technologies , 2012 .

[11]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  The Role of Mobile Devices in Facilitating Collaborative Inquiry in situ , 2008, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[12]  James Kisiel,et al.  Clarifying the complexities of school–museum interactions: Perspectives from two communities , 2014 .

[13]  Lung-Hsiang Wong,et al.  What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Angela Calabrese Barton,et al.  Using transformative boundary objects to create critical engagement in science: A case study , 2013 .

[15]  J. Osborne,et al.  Supporting Teachers on Science‐focused School Trips: Towards an integrated framework of theory and practice , 2007 .

[16]  Daner Sun,et al.  Boundary interaction: Towards developing a mobile technology-enabled science curriculum to integrate learning in the informal spaces , 2018, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  Prashant Doshi,et al.  Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and teaching , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[18]  T. Tal,et al.  Assessing Learning in the Outdoors with the Field Trip in Natural Environments (FiNE) Framework , 2012 .

[19]  Jianwei Zhang,et al.  Cross-Community Interaction for Knowledge Building in Two Grade 5/6 Classrooms , 2017, CSCL.

[20]  David Parsons,et al.  Abductive science inquiry using mobile devices in the classroom , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Marcelo Milrad,et al.  Mobile learning: small devices, big issues , 2009 .

[22]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[23]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010 , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[24]  Yanjie Song,et al.  “We found the ‘black spots’ on campus on our own”: development of inquiry skills in primary science learning with BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[25]  Guy Merchant,et al.  Mobile practices in everyday life: Popular digital technologies and schooling revisited , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[26]  G. Aikenhead,et al.  Students' ease in crossing cultural borders into school science , 2001 .

[27]  Ann Jones,et al.  Personal Inquiry: Orchestrating Science Investigations Within and Beyond the Classroom , 2015 .

[28]  Bradley Barker,et al.  A Model of Factors Contributing to STEM Learning and Career Orientation , 2015 .

[29]  Daner Sun,et al.  The Innovative Immersion of Mobile Learning into a Science Curriculum in Singapore: an Exploratory Study , 2016 .

[30]  Edmund A. Marek,et al.  Relationships among Informal Learning Environments, Teaching Procedures and Scientific Reasoning Ability. , 2001 .

[31]  Olugbemiro J. Jegede,et al.  Cross‐cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon , 1999 .

[32]  Louis S. Nadelson,et al.  Teacher STEM Perception and Preparation: Inquiry-Based STEM Professional Development for Elementary Teachers , 2013 .

[33]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Science Learning , 1996 .

[34]  W. Chen,et al.  How artefacts mediate small-group co-creation activities in a mobile-assisted seamless language learning environment? , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[35]  Julian Williams,et al.  Black Boxes in Workplace Mathematics , 2007 .

[36]  G. Aikenhead,et al.  Science Education: Border Crossing into the Subculture of Science , 1996 .

[37]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: Learning my way , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Jianwei Zhang,et al.  Co-Organizing the Collective Journey of Inquiry With Idea Thread Mapper , 2018 .

[39]  Using a Field Trip Inventory to Determine If Listening to Elementary School Students' Conversations, While on a Zoo Field Trip, Enhances Preservice Teachers' Abilities to Plan Zoo Field Trips , 2013 .

[40]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  Mobile learning in context , 2012 .

[41]  Daner Sun,et al.  Implementing mobile learning curricula in a grade level: Empirical study of learning effectiveness at scale , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Chee-Kit Looi,et al.  Location matters: leveraging knowledge building with mobile devices and Web 2.0 technology , 2009, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[43]  A. Bakker,et al.  Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects , 2011 .