Frictional evaluation of self ligating system and conventionally available traditional system: A review

The present period of self-ligating system includes the framework related with improving and giving more proficient treatment modalities building up an inclination to contrast them with the routinely accessible framework. Alike conventially accessible customary apparatuses, self-ligating framework give the simplicity of ligation when contrasted with the conventional accessible framework which require the utilization of elastomeric modules or metallic ligatures. A short portrayal of the self-ligating sections interms of the frictional resistance and the advancements, clinical focal points and the confirmation in regards to treatment productivity is investigated. The present article distinguishes the frictional resistance and the adequacy of the self ligating framework with the conventionally available appliance system.

[1]  R. Nanda,et al.  Frictional resistance of the Damon SL bracket. , 1998, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[2]  S. Straja,et al.  Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. , 2001, Clinical orthodontics and research.

[3]  D. Birnie,et al.  Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  Greg J. Huang,et al.  Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  K. Ison,et al.  Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[6]  C. Elias,et al.  Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations , 2014, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[7]  B. Lim,et al.  Effect of self-ligating bracket type and vibration on frictional force and stick-slip phenomenon in diverse tooth displacement conditions: an in vitro mechanical analysis. , 2015, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  P. Proff,et al.  Frictional properties of aesthetic brackets. , 2007, European journal of orthodontics.

[9]  D. Millett,et al.  Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance. , 2004, European journal of orthodontics.

[10]  M. Pharoah,et al.  A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with the edgewise and Speed appliances. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  M. Sherriff,et al.  A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.

[12]  B. Melsen,et al.  Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.

[13]  P. Fleming,et al.  Self-ligating appliances: evolution or revolution? , 2008, Australian orthodontic journal.

[14]  N. Harradine.  Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. , 2008, Clinical orthodontics and research.

[15]  J. Voudouris.  Interactive edgewise mechanisms: form and function comparison with conventional edgewise brackets. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  P. Miles,et al.  Self-ligating brackets: present and future. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  R. T. Lee,et al.  Pain experience during initial alignment with a self-ligating and a conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system. A randomized controlled clinical trial. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[18]  N. Waters,et al.  A Comparison of the Forces Required to Produce Tooth Movement ex vivo through Three Types of Pre-adjusted Brackets When Subjected to Determined Tip or Torque Values , 1994, British journal of orthodontics.

[19]  N. Waters,et al.  A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation. , 1993, European journal of orthodontics.

[20]  J. Botero,et al.  Comparison of frictional resistance among conventional, active and passive selfligating brackets with different combinations of arch wires: a finite elements study. , 2016, Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL.

[21]  M. Cicciu',et al.  Analysis of resistance to sliding expressed during first order correction with conventional and self-ligating brackets : an in-vitro study , 2016 .

[22]  T. Meling,et al.  The effect of friction on the bending stiffness of orthodontic beams: a theoretical and in vitro study. , 1997, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.

[23]  S. Paduano,et al.  Time efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems. , 2008, Progress in orthodontics.

[24]  P. Miles.  Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics: Do they deliver what they claim? , 2009, Australian dental journal.

[25]  S. Tecco,et al.  An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance. , 2007, European journal of orthodontics.

[26]  R. Weyant,et al.  A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. , 2006, The Angle orthodontist.