Technology support for cooperative work: A framework for studying introduction and assimilation in organizations

This article draws on published research on the nature of the innovation process and exploratory field research in 10 companies to develop a framework for research on organizations’ introduction and assimilation of computer‐supported cooperative work technologies. The research reported in this article, part of a much larger study of the general process of innovation in organizations, focuses specifically on the transfer and assimilation of new technology innovations. Technologies to support group process, communication, and coordination in face‐to‐face group meetings [electronic meeting support systems (EMSS)] were chosen to illustrate the use of the research framework. The article focuses on the transfer of these technologies from R“D units to target organizational units and the alignment of group, technology, and task during assimilation by end‐user groups. Research propositions are developed and discussed. Future articles will present the findings from current research that utilizes the frameworks pres...

[1]  Linda L. Putnam.  Small Group Work Climates , 1983 .

[2]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[3]  James Brian Quinn,et al.  Innovation and Corporate Strategy: Managed Chaos , 1985 .

[4]  Peter K. Mills,et al.  Managerial practices that enhance innovation , 1985 .

[5]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Conflict management and group decision support systems , 1988, CSCW '88.

[6]  George P. Huber,et al.  Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems , 1984, MIS Q..

[7]  Thomas J. Bouchard,et al.  A comparison of individual, subgroup, and total group methods of problem solving. , 1974 .

[8]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Implications for problem‐solving groups of empirical research on ‘brainstorming’: A critical review of the literature , 1978 .

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Facilitating Group Creativity: Experience with a Group Decision Support System , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Roger K. Mosvick,et al.  We'Ve Got to Start Meeting Like This!: A Guide to Successful Business Meeting Management , 1986 .

[11]  Robert C. Ziller,et al.  Group Size: A Determinant of the Quality and Stability of Group Decisions , 1957 .

[12]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Computer-Aided Deliberation: Model Management and Group Decision Support: Special Focus Article , 1988, Oper. Res..

[13]  Shoshana Zuboff.  In the Age of the Smart Machine , 1988 .

[14]  R. Daft.  A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation , 1978 .

[15]  R. Barry Ruback,et al.  The process of brainstorming: An analysis with individual and group vocal parameters. , 1984 .

[16]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making , 1988, CSUR.

[17]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  DOES GROUP PARTICIPATION WHEN USING BRAINSTORMING FACILITATE OR INHIBIT CREATIVE THINKING , 1958 .

[18]  R. Kanter.  The Change Masters , 1983 .

[19]  S. R. Hiltz.  The Network Nation , 1978 .

[20]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[21]  A. K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Some concepts of technology transfer: adoption of innovations in organizational context , 1973 .

[22]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Building the Parallel Organization: Creating Mechanisms for Permanent Quality of Work Life , 1980 .

[23]  Paul Gray,et al.  Assessing GDSS empirical research , 1990 .

[24]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Computer-aided group decision making: Theory and practice , 1974 .

[25]  Helmut Lamm,et al.  Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency , 1973 .

[26]  Daniel Quinn Mills.  Rebirth of the corporation , 1991 .

[27]  C. Perrow.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[28]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Nick Experimentation: Selected Results Concerning Effectiveness of Meeting Support Technology , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  P. Slater.  Contrasting Correlates of Group Size , 1958 .

[30]  Wallace C. Fotheringham,et al.  Experimental studies of motivated group discussion , 1958 .

[31]  R. Bales,et al.  Symlog, A System for the Multiple Level Observation of Groups , 1979 .

[32]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[33]  Morton A. Lieberman,et al.  The Deviant Member in Therapy Groups , 1958 .

[34]  E. Schein.  Process Consultation : Its Role in Organization Development , 1969 .

[35]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[36]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Knowledge Management in Organizational Planning , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading groups in organizations , 1986 .

[38]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[39]  David A. Nadler,et al.  A model for diagnosing organizational behavior , 1980 .

[40]  J McDAVID,et al.  Personality and situational determinants of conformity. , 1959, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[41]  Richard E. Walton,et al.  Up and Running: Integrating Information Technology and the Organization , 1989 .

[42]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[43]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Group Decision Support Systems: Determinants of Success , 1987 .

[44]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[45]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A group decision support system for idea generation and issue analysis in organization planning , 1986, CSCW '86.

[46]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic Meeting System Experience at IBM , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  L. Floyd Lewis,et al.  Facilitator : a microcomputer decision support system for small groups , 1982 .

[48]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[49]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  Twenty questions: efficiency in problem solving as a function of size of group. , 1952, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[50]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Decision Support Systems: Directed and Nondirected Change , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Deborah L. Gladstein,et al.  Boundary Management in New Product Teams. , 1985 .

[52]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[53]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[54]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[55]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing system , 1981, CACM.

[56]  J. Hackman,et al.  Toward understanding the role of tasks in behavioral research. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[57]  R. F. Lovelace,et al.  Stimulating creativity through managerial intervention , 1986 .

[58]  Thomas J. Bouchard,et al.  Personality, problem-solving procedure, and performance in small groups. , 1969 .

[59]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Computer Support for Group Versus Individual Decisions , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[60]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[61]  Harold J. Leavitt,et al.  Suppose We Took Groups Seriously... , 1974 .

[62]  W L FAUST,et al.  Group versus individual problem-solving. , 1959, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[63]  John P. Campbell,et al.  The effect of group participation on brainstorming effectiveness for 2 industrial samples. , 1963 .

[64]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  The effect of computer-based support on influence attempts and patterns in small group decision-making , 1987 .

[65]  R. Bales,et al.  Channels of communication in small groups. , 1951 .

[66]  James I. Cash,et al.  Managing the Introduction of Information Systems Technology in Strategically Dependent Companies , 1985, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[68]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[69]  S. Davis.  Future Perfect , 1987 .

[70]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[71]  A. Hare.  A Study of Interaction and Consensus in Different Sized Groups , 1952 .

[72]  John F. Rockart,et al.  Executive Support Systems: The Emergence of Top Management Computer Use , 1988 .

[73]  A. Zander,et al.  Group dynamics, research and theory , 1955 .

[74]  Ronald Brent Gallupe,et al.  The impact of task difficulty on the use of a group decision support system , 1985 .

[75]  M. Markus.  Systems in Organizations: Bugs and Features , 1984 .

[76]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[77]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings , 1988, CACM.

[78]  Henry Mintzberg.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[79]  E. Thomas,et al.  Effects of group size. , 1963, Psychological bulletin.

[80]  M. Comadena,et al.  Brainstorming Groups , 1984 .

[81]  Frederick F. Stephan,et al.  The Distribution of Participation in Small Groups: An Exponential Approximation , 1952 .

[82]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[83]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[84]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .