Are 'Webographic' or Attitudinal Questions Useful for Adjusting Estimates from Web Surveys Using Propensity Scoring?

Inference from Web surveys may be affected by non-random selection of Web survey participants. One approach to reduce selection bias is to use propensity scores and a parallel phone survey. This approach uses demographic and additional so-called Webographic or lifestyle variables to balance observed differences between Web survey respondents and phone survey respondents. Here the authors investigate some of the Webographic questions used by Harris Interactive, a commercial company specializing in Web surveys. Their Webographic questions include choice of activities such as reading, sports and traveling and perceptions about what would constitute a violation of privacy. They use data from an existing probability sample of respondents over 40 who are interviewed over the phone, and a corresponding sample of respondents interviewed over the Web. They find that Webographic questions differentiate between on and offline populations differently than demographic questions. In general, propensity score adjustment of variables in the Web survey works quite well for a number of variables of interest (including home ownership and labor force participation). For two outcomes, (having emotional problems and often experiencing pain) the process of adjusting for demographic variables leads to the discovery of an instance of Simpson's paradox, implying a differential mode effect or differential selection. They interpret this mainly as the result of a mode effect, where sensitive questions are more likely to receive a positive response over the Internet than over the phone.

[1]  Ron D Hays,et al.  Equivalence of mail and telephone responses to the CAHPS Hospital Survey. , 2005, Health services research.

[2]  Sunghee Lee Propensity score adjustment as a weighting scheme for volunteer panel web surveys , 2006 .

[3]  Kristin Duncan Using Propensity Scores to Control Coverages Bias in Telephone Surveys , 2001 .

[4]  J. Day,et al.  Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2003 , 2005 .

[5]  E. H. Simpson,et al.  The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables , 1951 .

[6]  G. Imbens,et al.  Estimation of Causal Effects using Propensity Score Weighting: An Application to Data on Right Heart Catheterization , 2001, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[7]  Annica Isaksson,et al.  A Comparison Between Using the Web and Using the Telephone to Survey Political Opinions , 2003 .

[8]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  C. Drake Effects of misspecification of the propensity score on estimators of treatment effect , 1993 .

[10]  John Bremer,et al.  The Record of Internet-Based Opinion Polls in Predicting the Results of 72 Races in the November 2000 US Elections , 2001 .

[11]  P. Rosenbaum Model-Based Direct Adjustment , 1987 .

[12]  M. Couper,et al.  Adjusting for selection bias in Web surveys using propensity scores: the case of the Health and Retirement Study , 2002 .

[13]  Maria Varedian Comparing propensity score weighting with other Weighting Methods : A Case Study , 2003 .

[14]  S. Danielsson The propensity score and estimation in nonrandom surveys-an overview , 2002 .

[15]  Sunghee Lee STATISTICAL ESTIMATION METHODS IN VOLUNTEER PANEL WEB SURVEYS , 2004 .

[16]  D B Rubin,et al.  Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice. , 1996, Biometrics.

[17]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[18]  J. Rao,et al.  COMPENSATING FOR NONRESPONSE BIAS IN THE NATIONAL IMMUNIZATION SURVEY USING RESPONSE PROPENSITIES , 2000 .

[19]  G. Imbens,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score , 2002 .

[20]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[21]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 1988 .