Patient doses from CT examinations in Turkey.

PURPOSE We aimed to establish the first diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for computed tomography (CT) examinations in adult and pediatric patients in Turkey and compare these with international DRLs. METHODS CT performance information and examination parameters (for head, chest, high-resolution CT of the chest [HRCT-chest], abdominal, and pelvic protocols) from 1607 hospitals were collected via a survey. Dose length products and effective doses for standard patient sizes were calculated from the reported volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). RESULTS The median number of protocols reported from the 167 responding hospitals (10% response rate) was 102 across five different age groups. Third quartile CTDIvol values for adult pelvic and all pediatric body protocols were higher than the European Commission standards but were comparable to studies conducted in other countries. CONCLUSION The radiation dose indicators for adult patients were similar to those reported in the literature, except for those associated with head protocols. CT protocol optimization is necessary for adult head and pediatric chest, HRCT-chest, abdominal, and pelvic protocols. The findings from this study are recommended for use as national DRLs in Turkey.

[1]  G. Atac,et al.  Unintentional irradiation of conceptus by diagnostic imaging examinations in Turkey. , 2014, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[2]  M. McEntee,et al.  The establishment of computed tomography diagnostic reference levels in Portugal. , 2014, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  D. Origgi,et al.  Adult exposures from MDCT including multiphase studies: first Italian nationwide survey , 2014, European Radiology.

[4]  A. Lukasiewicz,et al.  Radiation dose index of renal colic protocol CT studies in the United States: a report from the American College of Radiology National Radiology Data Registry. , 2014, Radiology.

[5]  Madan M. Rehani,et al.  ICRP Publication 121: Radiological Protection in Paediatric Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology , 2013, Annals of the ICRP.

[6]  J. S. Wambani,et al.  Patient doses using multidetector computed tomography scanners in Kenya. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[7]  P. Johnston,et al.  Assessment of paediatric CT dose indicators for the purpose of optimisation. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  M. McEntee,et al.  Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  W. Huda,et al.  CT effective dose per dose length product using ICRP 103 weighting factors. , 2011, Medical physics.

[10]  G Panayiotakis,et al.  Adult patient radiation doses from non-cardiac CT examinations: a review of published results. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  Mohammad Hassan Kharita,et al.  Survey of patient dose in computed tomography in Syria 2009. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[12]  O. Linton,et al.  National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements report shows substantial medical exposure increase. , 2009, Radiology.

[13]  Bo Wang,et al.  Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children’s hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method , 2008, Pediatric Radiology.

[14]  F. Gudinchet,et al.  CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland , 2008, European Radiology.

[15]  Walter Huda,et al.  Radiation doses and risks in chest computed tomography examinations. , 2007, Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society.

[16]  P C Shrimpton,et al.  National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  D. Origgi,et al.  A survey of 14 computed tomography scanners in Greece and 32 scanners in Italy. Examination frequencies, dose reference values, effective doses and doses to organs. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[18]  Jack Valentin,et al.  Radiation and your patient: A guide for medical practitioners , 2001, Annals of the ICRP.

[19]  W Huda,et al.  An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. , 1997, Radiology.

[20]  R. M. Sievert,et al.  RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION , 1959 .

[21]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Multidetector CT radiation dose optimisation in adults: short- and long-term effects of a clinical audit , 2013, European Radiology.

[22]  P. Khong,et al.  Radiological Protection in Paediatric Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology , 2012 .

[23]  C. H. Clement,et al.  The Impact of the 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) in Medical Applications , 2009 .

[24]  Jack Valentin,et al.  Radiological protection in medicine , 2008 .

[25]  C. Monforton,et al.  Selected science: an industry campaign to undermine an OSHA hexavalent chromium standard , 2006, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[26]  D. Origgi,et al.  Survey of computed tomography techniques and absorbed dose in Italian hospitals: a comparison between two methods to estimate the dose–length product and the effective dose and to verify fulfilment of the diagnostic reference levels , 2005, European Radiology.

[27]  C L Chapple,et al.  Effective dose in paediatric computed tomography. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.