When Errors Are Rewarding

For social beings like humans, detecting one's own and others' errors is essential for efficient goal-directed behavior. Although one's own errors are always negative events, errors from other persons may be negative or positive depending on the social context. We used neuroimaging to disentangle brain activations related to error and reward processing, by manipulating the social context (cooperation or competition). Activation in posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC) was increased for all errors, independent of who made the error or the reward outcome. Conversely, activity in striatum was modulated by reward, independent of whether the action was erroneous or not. The results demonstrate a clear distinction between error and reward processing in the human brain. Importantly, the current study indicates that error detection in pMFC is independent of reward and generalizes beyond our own actions, highlighting its role in optimizing performance in both individual and joint action.

[1]  Ralf H. Trippe,et al.  Parallel brain activity for self-generated and observed errors , 2004 .

[2]  P. Montague,et al.  Activity in human ventral striatum locked to errors of reward prediction , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Learned Predictions of Error Likelihood in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2005, Science.

[4]  M. Reuter,et al.  Genetically Determined Differences in Learning from Errors , 2007, Science.

[5]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Error Monitoring Using External Feedback: Specific Roles of the Habenular Complex, the Reward System, and the Cingulate Motor Area Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[9]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[10]  Mark W Woolrich,et al.  Associative learning of social value , 2008, Nature.

[11]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[12]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Choice, uncertainty and value in prefrontal and cingulate cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Rushworth Intention, Choice, and the Medial Frontal Cortex , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Jeffrey C. Cooper,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward prediction , 2005, Current opinion in neurology.

[15]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Model‐Based fMRI and Its Application to Reward Learning and Decision Making , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  E. Procyk,et al.  Anterior cingulate activity during routine and non-routine sequential behaviors in macaques , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[19]  M. Walton,et al.  Interactions between decision making and performance monitoring within prefrontal cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.