The Interaction between Self-Bias and Reward: Evidence for Common and Distinct Processes

The perceptual matching of shapes and labels can be affected by both self- and reward-biases when shapes are linked either to labels referring to particular individuals (you, friend, stranger) or to different reward values (£8, £2, £0). We investigated the relations between these biases by varying the reward value associated with particular shape–label pairs (circle–you, square–friend, triangle–stranger). Self shape–label pairs (circle–you) always received no reward, while friend shape–label pairs (square–friend) received high reward and stranger shape–label pairs low reward (triangle–stranger), or the reverse (friend—low reward; stranger—high reward). Despite receiving no reward, responses to self-related pairs were advantaged relative to those to low-reward stimuli and did not differ from those to high-reward items. There was also an advantage for responses to high-reward friend pairs relative to low-reward stranger stimuli, and for high-reward stranger stimuli compared to low-reward friends. Correlations across individuals were found across trial blocks for both the self-advantage and the high-reward advantage, but the self- and reward-advantages were uncorrelated. This suggests that the self- and reward-advantage effects have different origins. In addition, the magnitude of the self-advantage varied according to the rated personal distance between a participant and a stranger. For individuals manifesting a close personal distance to strangers, the self-advantage was smaller, and sensitivity to reward influenced the difference between the self- and high-reward conditions. For individuals manifesting a large personal distance to strangers, sensitivity to reward did not affect self-matching. We suggest that self-advantages on perceptual matching arise independent of reward for individuals with a large personal distance to strangers. On the other hand, in individuals with a weak self-bias, high reward and the self modulate a common subjective value system.

[1]  Jie Sui,et al.  The salient self: the left intraparietal sulcus responds to social as well as perceptual-salience after self-association. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  David J. Turk,et al.  The self-reference effect on memory in early childhood. , 2014, Child development.

[3]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  S. Yantis,et al.  Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Perceptual effects of social salience: evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Contextual Knowledge Configures Attentional Control Networks , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  David J. Turk,et al.  When “It” Becomes “Mine”: Attentional Biases Triggered by Object Ownership , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  G. Northoff,et al.  Is Our Self Nothing but Reward? , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[9]  Shihui Han,et al.  Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  G. Northoff,et al.  Is Our Self Nothing but Reward? Neuronal Overlap and Distinction between Reward and Personal Relevance and Its Relation to Human Personality , 2009, PloS one.

[11]  Shihui Han,et al.  Cultural difference in neural mechanisms of self-recognition , 2009, Social neuroscience.

[12]  Jason P. Mitchell Contributions of Functional Neuroimaging to the Study of Social Cognition , 2008 .

[13]  David J. Turk,et al.  Yours or mine? Ownership and memory , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[14]  Carmel Mevorach,et al.  Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Bryan T. Denny,et al.  Medial prefrontal activity differentiates self from close others. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[16]  H. Gray,et al.  P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli , 2004 .

[17]  S. Klein,et al.  Two Self-Reference Effects: The Importance of Distinguishing Between Self-Descriptiveness Judgments and Autobiographical Retrieval in Self-Referent Encoding , 1989 .

[18]  John C. Pullyblank,et al.  Developmental invariance in the effects of functional self-knowledge on memory. , 1985 .

[19]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Super-capacity me! Super-capacity and violations of race independence for self- but not for reward-associated stimuli. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  J. T. Mordkoff,et al.  Dividing attention between color and shape revisited: redundant targets coactivate only when parts of the same perceptual object , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[21]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[22]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .