Boundary-Layer Control by Hydrophilic Surfaces

Effects due to hydrophilic surfaces are investigated on an airfoil by means of both experimental and numerical approaches. Boundary-layer velocity profiles are measured by embedded laser Doppler velocimetry along the NACA0012 airfoil upper-side surface on two identical wings (one of them being coated using hydrophilic treatment). Present experimental results clearly show that the hydrophilic treatment induces a positive viscosity gradient at the wall that significantly delays the boundary-layer separation occurrence and thus provides a favorable effect on lift-coefficient increase and drag-coefficient reduction. From solution of time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations, the numerical approach is conducted by accounting for the modification of the surface boundary condition as a slip-velocity condition. Different values of the slip velocity are investigated and compared with the reference case of a no-slip boundary condition. Calculated lift-and-drag coefficients well confirm the improvement due to a velocity slip along the airfoil boundary. The calculation results also show that the slope of velocity profiles at the airfoil surface is increased due to slip and that separation has partly or totally been avoided. Finally, the present experimental and numerical results indicate that aerodynamic benefits are clearly provided by hydrophilic surface treatments.

[1]  J. N. Hefner,et al.  Viscous drag reduction in boundary layers , 1990 .

[2]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  The Effect of Transition Modeling on the Prediction of Compressible Deep Dynamic Stall , 1997 .

[3]  Kevin W. Noonan,et al.  Control of the boundary layer separation about an airfoil by active surface heating , 1988 .

[4]  L. Maestrello,et al.  Separation control over an airfoil at high angles of attack by sound emanating from the surface , 1987 .

[5]  D. Favier,et al.  Embedded Laser Doppler Velocimetry Boundary-Layer Investigation on a Tilt-Rotor Blade , 2006 .

[6]  Dennis M. Bushnell Applications and suggested directions of transition research , 1990 .

[7]  John Kim,et al.  Effects of hydrophobic surface on skin-friction drag , 2004 .

[8]  Holger Mai,et al.  Dynamic stall and its passive control investigations on the OA209 airfoil section , 2005 .

[9]  Fabien Anselmet,et al.  Influence of wall suction on the organized motion in a turbulent boundary layer , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Ron F. Blackwelder,et al.  Some Notes on Drag Reduction in the Near-Wall Region , 1998 .

[11]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[12]  Stephen P. Wilkinson Direct drag measurement on thin-element riblets with suction and blowing , 1988 .

[13]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.  Flow Control: Passive, Active, and Reactive Flow Management , 2000 .

[14]  Dimitris Drikakis,et al.  Turbulence modelling and turbulent-flow computation in aeronautics , 2002, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[15]  R. F. Warming,et al.  An Implicit Factored Scheme for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1977 .

[16]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak Flow Control: Flow Control , 2000 .

[17]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak Flow Control: Contents , 2000 .

[18]  W. D. McComb,et al.  Development of local turbulent drag reduction due to nonuniform polymer concentration , 1979 .