Accurate Modeling of Faults by Multipoint, Mimetic, and Mixed Methods

The predominant way of modeling faults in industry-standard flow simulators is to introduce so-called transmissibility multipliers in the underlying two-point discretization. Although this approach provides adequate accuracy in many practical cases, two-point discretizations are only consistent for K-orthogonal grids and may introduce significant discretization errors for grids that severely depart from being K-orthogonal. Such grid-distortion errors can be avoided by lateral or vertical stair-stepping of deviated faults at the expense of errors in the geometrical fault description. In other words, modelers have the choice of either making (geometrical) errors by adapting faults to a grid that is almost K-orthogonal, or introducing discretization errors because of the lack of K-orthogonality if the grid is adapted to deviated faults. We propose a method for accurate description of faults in solvers based on a hybridized mixed or mimetic discretization, which also includes the MPFA-O method. The key idea is to represent faults as internal boundaries and calculate fault transmissibilities directly instead of using multipliers to modify grid-dependent transmissibilities. The resulting method is geology-driven and consistent for cells with planar surfaces and thereby avoids the grid errors inherent in the two-point method. We also propose a method to translate fault transmissibility multipliers into fault transmissibilities. This makes our method readily applicable to reservoir models that contain fault multipliers.

[1]  Tom Manzocchi,et al.  Fault transmissibility multipliers for flow simulation models , 1999, Petroleum Geoscience.

[2]  D. W. Peaceman Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation with nonsquare grid blocks and anisotropic permeability , 1983 .

[3]  E. Reiso,et al.  Control-Volume Discretization Method for Quadrilateral Grids with Faults and Local Refinements , 2001 .

[4]  B. Freeman,et al.  Quantitative Fault Seal Prediction , 1997 .

[5]  Stein Krogstad,et al.  Open-source MATLAB implementation of consistent discretisations on complex grids , 2012, Computational Geosciences.

[6]  Xiao-Hui Wu,et al.  Challenges and Technologies in Reservoir Modeling , 2009 .

[7]  Vincent Martin,et al.  Modeling Fractures and Barriers as Interfaces for Flow in Porous Media , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[8]  Ivar Aavatsmark,et al.  Interpretation of a two-point flux stencil for skew parallelogram grids , 2007 .

[9]  Hussein Hoteit,et al.  An efficient numerical model for incompressible two-phase flow in fractured media , 2008 .

[10]  Ivan Yotov,et al.  Local flux mimetic finite difference methods , 2009, Numerische Mathematik.

[11]  I. Aavatsmark,et al.  An Introduction to Multipoint Flux Approximations for Quadrilateral Grids , 2002 .

[12]  Xiao-Hui Wu,et al.  Effect of Grid Deviation on Flow Solutions , 2005 .

[13]  F. Brezzi,et al.  A FAMILY OF MIMETIC FINITE DIFFERENCE METHODS ON POLYGONAL AND POLYHEDRAL MESHES , 2005 .

[14]  I. Aavatsmark,et al.  Discretization on Non-Orthogonal, Curvilinear Grids for Multi-Phase Flow , 1994 .

[15]  Robert J. Knipe,et al.  Empirical estimation of fault rock properties , 2002 .

[16]  Michel Fortin,et al.  Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods , 2011, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics.