Iterative learning control of a membrane deformable mirror for optimal wavefront correction.

We present an iterative learning control (ILC) algorithm for controlling the shape of a membrane deformable mirror (DM). We furthermore give a physical interpretation of the design parameters of the ILC algorithm. On the basis of this insight, we derive a simple tuning procedure for the ILC algorithm that, in practice, guarantees stable and fast convergence of the membrane to the desired shape. In order to demonstrate the performance of the algorithm, we have built an experimental setup that consists of a commercial membrane DM, a wavefront sensor, and a real-time controller. The experimental results show that, by using the ILC algorithm, we are able to achieve a relatively small error between the real and desired shape of the DM while at the same time we are able to control the saturation of the actuators. Moreover, we show that the ILC algorithm outperforms other control algorithms available in the literature.

[1]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Membrane deformable mirror for adaptive optics: performance limits in visual optics. , 2003, Optics express.

[2]  M Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  Deformable mirrors with thermo-mechanical actuators for extreme ultraviolet lithography: Design, realization and validation , 2013 .

[3]  Sk Simon Ravensbergen Adaptive optics for extreme ultraviolet lithography : actuator design and validation for deformable mirror concepts , 2012 .

[4]  Luca Poletto,et al.  Push-pull membrane mirrors for adaptive optics. , 2006, Optics express.

[5]  Y Fainman,et al.  Adaptive control of a micromachined continuous-membrane deformable mirror for aberration compensation. , 1999, Applied optics.

[6]  S F Pereira,et al.  An innovative and efficient method to control the shape of push-pull membrane deformable mirror. , 2012, Optics express.

[7]  Mikhail A. Vorontsov,et al.  Fiber coupling with adaptive optics for free-space optical communication , 2002, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[8]  Aleksandar Haber,et al.  Linear computational complexity robust ILC for lifted systems , 2012, Autom..

[9]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Semidefinite programming for model-based sensorless adaptive optics. , 2012, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  S F Pereira,et al.  Determination of wavefront structure for a Hartmann wavefront sensor using a phase-retrieval method. , 2012, Optics express.

[11]  Steven M. Jones,et al.  Adaptive-optics optical coherence tomography for high-resolution and high-speed 3D retinal in vivo imaging. , 2005, Optics express.

[12]  A.G. Alleyne,et al.  A survey of iterative learning control , 2006, IEEE Control Systems.

[13]  Robert K. Tyson Principles of Adaptive Optics , 1991 .

[14]  P. Sarro,et al.  Flexible mirror micromachined in silicon. , 1995, Applied optics.

[15]  Seung-Whan Bahk,et al.  A high-resolution, adaptive beam-shaping system for high-power lasers. , 2010, Optics express.

[16]  Francois Roddier,et al.  Adaptive Optics in Astronomy: Imaging through the atmosphere , 2004 .

[17]  T. Hebert,et al.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 2002, Optics express.

[18]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[19]  V. Verdult,et al.  Filtering and System Identification: A Least Squares Approach , 2007 .

[20]  D. Malacara Optical Shop Testing , 1978 .

[21]  M. Booth Adaptive optics in microscopy. , 2003, Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences.

[22]  P. R. Fraanje,et al.  Fast and Robust Iterative Learning Control for Lifted Systems , 2011 .