Numerical parametric study of tunneling-induced joint rotation angle in jointed pipelines

Pipeline–tunnel interaction has attracted increasing research attention recently. Previous studies focused mainly on tunneling-induced deformation in continuous pipelines. In this paper, an extensive numerical parametric study is conducted to investigate the response of jointed pipelines (where joints are simulated as hinges) to tunnel excavation. Prior to the numerical parametric study, the numerical model was verified by centrifuge test results. Parameters considered include ground settlement profile, pipe dimensions, pipe segment length, and soil properties. The maximum and minimum joint rotation angles occur when the tunnel centerline is located directly beneath a joint and a pipe segment center, respectively. When pipe segments are relatively flexible, the joint rotation angle increases rapidly as pipe segment flexural stiffness increases. In contrast, negligible changes are observed in the joint rotation angle for relatively stiff pipe segments when pipe segment flexural stiffness changes. A dimensi...

[1]  Douglas J. Nyman,et al.  Guidelines for the Seismic Design and Assessment of Natural Gas and Liquid Hydrocarbon Pipelines , 2002 .

[2]  David Chapman,et al.  Investigating ground movements caused by the construction of multiple tunnels in soft ground using laboratory model tests , 2007 .

[3]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Effects of the construction sequence of twin tunnels at different depths on an existing pile , 2014 .

[4]  Yu Wang,et al.  Simplified design model for rigid pipe joints based on the two-pipe approximation1 , 2015 .

[5]  Robert J. Mair,et al.  SUBSURFACE SETTLEMENT PROFILES ABOVE TUNNELS IN CLAYS , 1993 .

[6]  M. Bolton THE STRENGTH AND DILATANCY OF SANDS , 1986 .

[7]  K. Soga,et al.  Soil-pipe interaction due to tunnelling: comparison between Winkler and elastic continuum solutions , 2005 .

[8]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Kinematics of jointed pipes and design estimates of joint rotation under differential ground movements , 2015 .

[9]  Assaf Klar,et al.  Design Oriented Linear-Equivalent Approach for Evaluating the Effect of Tunneling on Pipelines , 2016 .

[10]  Assaf Klar,et al.  Tunnels in sands: the effect of size, depth and volume loss on greenfield displacements , 2012 .

[11]  Yu Wang,et al.  Buried pipeline responses to ground displacements induced by adjacent static pipe bursting , 2013 .

[12]  Fabrice Emeriault,et al.  Full-Scale Experimental Determination of Concrete Pipe Joint Behavior and Its Modeling , 2008 .

[13]  K. Soga,et al.  Estimating the Effects of Tunneling on Existing Pipelines , 2005 .

[14]  A. R. Selby,et al.  Soil Movements Induced by Tunnelling and Their Effects on Pipelines and Structures , 1986 .

[15]  WangYu,et al.  Numerical modeling of tunneling effect on buried pipelines , 2011 .

[16]  Assaf Klar,et al.  Tunneling beneath Buried Pipes: View of Soil Strain and Its Effect on Pipeline Behavior , 2010 .

[17]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Three-dimensional centrifuge modelling of the effects of twin tunnelling on an existing pile , 2013 .

[18]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Simplified Design Equations for Joints in Buried Flexible Pipes Based on Hetényi Solutions , 2014 .

[19]  Assaf Klar,et al.  Tunneling effects on jointed pipelines , 2008 .

[20]  C.R.I. Clayton,et al.  Monitoring and displacements at Heathrow Express Terminal 4 station tunnels , 2006 .

[21]  Müge Balkaya,et al.  Study of non-uniform bedding due to voids under jointed PVC water distribution pipes , 2012 .