Seismic attenuation relationship with homogeneous and heterogeneous prediction-error variance models

Peak ground acceleration (PGA) estimation is an important task in earthquake engineering practice. One of the most well-known models is the Boore-Joyner-Fumal formula, which estimates the PGA using the moment magnitude, the site-to-fault distance and the site foundation properties. In the present study, the complexity for this formula and the homogeneity assumption for the prediction-error variance are investigated and an efficiency-robustness balanced formula is proposed. For this purpose, a reduced-order Monte Carlo simulation algorithm for Bayesian model class selection is presented to obtain the most suitable predictive formula and prediction-error model for the seismic attenuation relationship. In this approach, each model class (a predictive formula with a prediction-error model) is evaluated according to its plausibility given the data. The one with the highest plausibility is robust since it possesses the optimal balance between the data fitting capability and the sensitivity to noise. A database of strong ground motion records in the Tangshan region of China is obtained from the China Earthquake Data Center for the analysis. The optimal predictive formula is proposed based on this database. It is shown that the proposed formula with heterogeneous prediction-error variance is much simpler than the attenuation model suggested by Boore, Joyner and Fumal (1993).

[1]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Bayesian Probabilistic Approach for the Correlations of Compression Index for Marine Clays , 2009 .

[2]  John Douglas,et al.  How accurate can strong ground motion attenuation relations be , 2001 .

[3]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Recent developments of Bayesian model class selection and applications in civil engineering , 2010 .

[4]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Methods for regression analysis of strong-motion data , 1993, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[5]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Bayesian Methods for Updating Dynamic Models , 2011 .

[6]  J. Beck,et al.  Model Selection using Response Measurements: Bayesian Probabilistic Approach , 2004 .

[7]  D Candidat Attenuation of peak ground accelerations from the great Wenchuan earthquake , 2009 .

[8]  Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.  Updating Uncertainties in Friction Angles of Clean Sands , 2011 .

[9]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Analysis of the attenuation of strong ground motion on the island of Hawaii , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[10]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Efficient model updating and health monitoring methodology using incomplete modal data without mode matching , 2006 .

[11]  Thomas Brox,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation , 2019, Time Series Analysis.

[12]  S. Midorikawa,et al.  VARIANCE OF PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION AND VELOCITY IN ATTENUATION RELATIONSHIPS , 2002 .

[13]  N. Donovan,et al.  UNCERTAINTIES IN SEISMIC RISK PROCEDURES , 1978 .

[14]  J. Beck,et al.  Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework , 1998 .

[15]  Xiaojun Li,et al.  Preliminary analysis of the hanging wall effect and velocity pulse of the 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake , 2009 .

[16]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Bayesian Network Enhanced with Structural Reliability Methods: Application , 2010, 1203.5985.

[17]  James L. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of the Phase II IASC–ASCE Structural Health Monitoring Experimental Benchmark Data , 2004 .

[18]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Peak Ground Acceleration Estimation by Linear and Nonlinear Models with Reduced Order Monte Carlo Simulation , 2010, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[19]  K. Yuen Bayesian Methods for Structural Dynamics and Civil Engineering , 2010 .

[20]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  An efficient simulation method for reliability analysis of linear dynamical systems using simple additive rules of probability , 2005 .

[21]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Bayesian Network Enhanced with Structural Reliability Methods: Methodology , 2010, 1203.5986.

[22]  J. Douglas,et al.  Equations for the Estimation of Strong Ground Motions from Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Using Data from Europe and the Middle East: Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration and Spectral Acceleration , 2005 .

[23]  David M. Boore,et al.  Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1981 .

[24]  David R. Brillinger,et al.  An exploratory analysis of the Joyner-Boore attenuation data , 1984 .

[25]  F. Scholz Maximum Likelihood Estimation , 2006 .

[26]  James L. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Updating and Model Class Selection for Hysteretic Structural Models Using Stochastic Simulation , 2008 .

[27]  FabioCasciati,et al.  PGA and structural dynamics input motion at a given site , 2003 .

[28]  A new attenuation model of near-fault ground motions with consideration of the hanging wall effect in the Wenchuan earthquake , 2011 .

[29]  James L. Beck,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring via Measured Ritz Vectors Utilizing Artificial Neural Networks , 2006, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[30]  David R. Brillinger,et al.  Further analysis of the Joyner-Boore attenuation data , 1985 .

[31]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Reliability analysis of soil-water characteristics curve and its application to slope stability analysis , 2012 .

[32]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Model updating using noisy response measurements without knowledge of the input spectrum , 2005 .

[33]  J. Bommer,et al.  Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East , 2007 .

[34]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Empirical Prediction Equations for Peak Ground Velocity Derived from Strong-Motion Records from Europe and the Middle East , 2007 .

[35]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Simultaneous study of the source, path, and site effects on strong ground motion during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: A preliminary result on pervasive nonlinear site effects , 1991 .

[36]  K. Yuen,et al.  A novel probabilistic method for robust parametric identification and outlier detection , 2012 .

[37]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Fatigue predictions in entire body of metallic structures from a limited number of vibration sensors using Kalman filtering , 2011 .

[38]  Li Ming,et al.  Performance-based methodology for assessing seismic vulnerability and capacity of buildings , 2010 .

[39]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Variability of updated finite element models and their predictions consistent with vibration measurements , 2012 .

[40]  James L. Beck,et al.  Prior and Posterior Robust Stochastic Predictions for Dynamical Systems using Probability Logic , 2013 .

[41]  J. Beck Bayesian system identification based on probability logic , 2010 .

[42]  K. L. McLaughlin Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Strong-Motion Attenuation Relationships , 1991 .

[43]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Magnitude-dependent variance of peak ground acceleration , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[44]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  ESTIMATION OF RESPONSE SPECTRA AND PEAK ACCELERATIONS FROM WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN EARTHQUAKES: AN INTERIM REPORT PART 2 , 1993 .