Functional outcome after road-crash injury: description of the ESPARR victims cohort and 6-month follow-up results.

OBJECTIVE It is essential to know about the long-term consequences of road crashes involving corporal injury in order to adopt relevant public health measures. METHODS The ESPARR cohort comprises 1168 road-crash victims, aged 16 or over, managed in hospitals in the Rhône administrative départment (France). It is based on the Registry of Road Traffic Casualties, which has been collecting exhaustive data since 1995. Two groups are monitored: mild to moderate (M-AIS 1 or 2) and severe (M-AIS > or =3). Patients were interviewed at the point of primary care, between 1 October 2004 and 31 July 2006. 6 months later, their state of health and presence of pain were compared. Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) was performed to identify factors related to residual pain. RESULTS Adults of the cohort were compared to the road crash population as a whole recorded over the same period in the same area. At 6 months post-accident, only 31.9% of victims deemed their health status to have entirely returned to normal; 63.8% of mild to moderate and 89.2% of severe cases reported residual pain, but neither pain frequency nor intensity correlated with M-AIS. Residual pain was related to lower limb injuries (OR=1.6; 95% CI=1.1-2.4). After adjustment, pain was essentially related to age, seriousness of the lesions and a stay in a rehabilitation unit. CONCLUSION The ESPARR cohort provides a unique opportunity in France to describe the trajectory of a road crash victim, in terms both of care and rehabilitation and of resumption of work and personal activity.

[1]  D. Eilertsen,et al.  The predictive value of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms for quality of life: a longitudinal study of physically injured victims of non-domestic violence , 2007, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[2]  John Coverdale,et al.  A population-based cohort study of longer-term changes in health of car drivers involved in serious crashes. , 2006, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  J. Kenardy,et al.  Physical and psychological factors maintain long-term predictive capacity post-whiplash injury , 2006, PAIN.

[4]  E. Lindeman,et al.  Determinants of long-term functional consequences after major trauma. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  J P Anderson,et al.  Outcome after major trauma: discharge and 6-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. , 1998, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Early predictors of long-term work disability after major limb trauma. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  G. Murray,et al.  Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: prospective cohort study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  B K Philip,et al.  Parametric statistics for evaluation of the visual analog scale. , 1990, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  Saakje Mulder,et al.  Functional outcome at 2.5, 5, 9, and 24 months after injury in the Netherlands. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  Jean-Louis Martin,et al.  Actual incidences of road casualties, and their injury severity, modelled from police and hospital data, France. , 2008, European journal of public health.

[11]  A. Finset,et al.  Long-term multidimensional functional consequences of severe multiple injuries two years after trauma: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  P. Joseph,et al.  [Life satisfaction and psychosocial outcome in severe traumatic brain injuries in Aquitaine]. , 2002, Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique.

[13]  R. Mayou,et al.  Outcome in consecutive emergency department attenders following a road traffic accident , 2001, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[14]  D. Price,et al.  The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain , 1983, Pain.

[15]  D. Hoyt,et al.  Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. , 1998 .

[16]  Keith Owen Yeates,et al.  A prospective study of short- and long-term outcomes after traumatic brain injury in children: behavior and achievement. , 2002, Neuropsychology.

[17]  A. Söderlund,et al.  Long-term functional and psychological problems in whiplash associated disorders. , 1999, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[18]  J. Sampalis,et al.  Functional status and quality of life in survivors of injury treated at tertiary trauma centers: what are we neglecting? , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  R. Ferrari,et al.  A prospective cohort study of the outcome of acute whiplash injury in Greece. , 2000, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[20]  H. Markogiannakis,et al.  Motor vehicle trauma: analysis of injury profiles by road-user category , 2005, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[21]  Predicting quality of life six months after traumatic injury. , 2005 .

[22]  J. A. Baldry Currens,et al.  Evaluation of disability and handicap following injury. , 2000, Injury.

[23]  Michael Fitzharris,et al.  General Health Status and Functional Disability Following Injury in Traffic Crashes , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[24]  C. Maher,et al.  Course and prognostic factors of whiplash: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, PAIN.

[25]  B. Quintard,et al.  Satisfaction de vie et devenir psychosocial des traumatisés crâniens graves en Aquitaine , 2002 .

[26]  W H Eisma,et al.  Long-term physical, psychological and social consequences of severe injuries. , 1998, Injury.

[27]  F. Koenig,et al.  Functional recovery at a minimum of 2 years after multiple injury-development of an outcome score. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[28]  S. Braver,et al.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods , 1986, Pain.

[29]  S P Baker,et al.  A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[30]  J. Cottraux,et al.  The Validation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Nonclinical Subjects , 2001, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[31]  Gabriella Guasticchi,et al.  Road traffic injuries in Lazio, Italy: a descriptive analysis from an emergency department-based surveillance system. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[32]  R. Ferrari,et al.  Epidemiology of whiplash: an international dilemma* , 1999, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[33]  M. Wallis,et al.  Predictors of health-related quality of life 3 months after traumatic injury. , 2008, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[34]  D. Hoyt,et al.  Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[35]  Justine Shults,et al.  Early predictors of long-term disability after injury. , 2003, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[36]  J P Bull,et al.  Disabilities caused by road traffic accidents and their relation to severity scores. , 1985, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  C. K. van der Sluis,et al.  Multiple injuries: an overview of the outcome. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[38]  A. Ehlers,et al.  Prediction of psychological outcomes one year after a motor vehicle accident. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[39]  A. Sutherland,et al.  The new injury severity score: better prediction of functional recovery after musculoskeletal injury. , 2006, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[40]  D. Obelieniene,et al.  Pain after whiplash: a prospective controlled inception cohort study , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[41]  L. Matthews.  Work potential of road accident survivors with post-traumatic stress disorder. , 2005, Behaviour research and therapy.

[42]  P. Edwards,et al.  Young men were at risk of becoming lost to follow-up in a cohort of head-injured adults. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[43]  G Wilkinson,et al.  Anxiety and depression disorders 5 years after severe injuries: a prospective follow-up study. , 1999, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[44]  E. Lindeman,et al.  Long-term functional health status of severely injured patients. , 2007, Injury.