The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy

Governments are increasingly turning to public sector innovation (PSI) labs to take new approaches to policy and service design. This turn towards PSI labs, which has accelerated in more recent years, has been linked to a number of trends. These include growing interest in evidence-based policymaking and the application of ‘design thinking’ to policymaking, although these trends sit uncomfortably together. According to their proponents, PSI labs are helping to create a new era of experimental government and rapid experimentation in policy design. But what do these PSI labs do? How do they differ from other public sector change agents and policy actors? What approaches do they bring to addressing contemporary policymaking? And how do they relate to other developments in policy design such as the growing interest in evidence-based policy and design experiments? The rise of PSI labs has thus far received little attention from policy scientists. Focusing on the problems associated with conceptualising PSI labs and clearly situating them in the policy process, this paper provides an analysis of some of the most prominent PSI labs. It examines whether labs can be classified into distinct types, their relationship to government and other policy actors and the principal methodological practices and commitments underpinning their approach to policymaking. Throughout, the paper considers how the rise of PSI labs may challenge positivist framings of policymaking as an empirically driven decision process.

[1]  Harlan Yu,et al.  The New Ambiguity of 'Open Government' , 2012 .

[2]  M. Howlett,et al.  Policy advice through the market: The role of external consultants in contemporary policy advisory systems , 2013 .

[3]  Udaya Wagle The policy science of democracy: The issues of methodology and citizen participation , 2000 .

[4]  Veiko Lember,et al.  Discovering Innovation Labs in the Public Sector , 2015 .

[5]  Caroline Hummels,et al.  Social design: an introduction , 2016 .

[6]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  Talking About Government , 2011 .

[7]  M. Howlett,et al.  The dual dynamics of policy advisory systems: The impact of externalization and politicization on policy advice , 2013 .

[8]  A. Schneider,et al.  Public Design in Global Perspective: Empirical Trends , 2014 .

[9]  Lucy Kimbell,et al.  Design in the Time of Policy Problems , 2016 .

[10]  Dimitri Schuurman,et al.  Innovation in the Public Sector: Exploring the Characteristics and Potential of Living Labs and Innovation Labs , 2017 .

[11]  Ben Williamson,et al.  Governing methods: policy innovation labs, design and data science in the digital governance of education , 2015 .

[12]  Anas Almughairy The Gap of Teaching Sustainability in Planning and Urban Design Programs in Saudi Arabia , 2016 .

[13]  A. Veselý Externalization of policy advice: Theory, methodology and evidence , 2013 .

[14]  T. Tenbensel Policy Knowledge for Policy Work , 2006 .

[15]  Ioanna Lykourentzou,et al.  Innovation Labs: Leveraging Openness for Radical Innovation? , 2016 .

[16]  H. Colebatch The work of policy : an international survey , 2006 .

[17]  Jenny M. Lewis,et al.  Bureaucracy, Network, or Enterprise? Comparing Models of Governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand , 2003 .

[18]  C. Sabel,et al.  Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture , 2010 .

[19]  Fuller Matt,et al.  Public policy labs in European Union members states , 2016 .

[20]  Ben Williamson Testing governance: the laboratory lives and methods of policy innovation labs , 2015 .

[21]  C. Hood A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[22]  Wayne Parsons,et al.  From Muddling Through to Muddling Up - Evidence Based Policy Making and the Modernisation of British Government , 2002 .

[23]  Peter John,et al.  Policy entrepreneurship in UK central government: The behavioural insights team and the use of randomized controlled trials , 2014, Public policy and administration.

[24]  M. Howlett,et al.  Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems , 1996 .

[25]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Design Thinking in Policymaking Processes: Opportunities and Challenges , 2016 .

[26]  V. Bekkers,et al.  A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey , 2014 .

[27]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  The role of magic concepts , 2011 .

[28]  Patricia W. Ingraham,et al.  The Reinvention Game , 1996 .

[29]  D. Halpin,et al.  Think tanks and strategic policy-making: the contribution of think tanks to policy advisory systems , 2016, Policy Sciences.

[30]  S. Acevedo,et al.  Innovation for Better Management: The Contribution of Public Innovation Labs , 2016 .

[31]  L. Kimbell Applying Design Approaches to Policy Making: Discovering Policy Lab , 2015 .

[32]  Brian Head,et al.  Three lenses of evidence-based policy , 2008 .

[33]  Peter Lloyd,et al.  The introduction of design to policymaking: Policy Lab and the UK government , 2016 .

[34]  Jonathan Craft,et al.  Policy formulation, governance shifts and policy influence: location and content in policy advisory systems , 2012, Journal of Public Policy.

[35]  J. Kassirer Goodbye, for now. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  Dw Adams,et al.  Usable knowledge in public policy , 2004 .

[37]  Christian Bason,et al.  Powering Collaborative Policy Innovation: Can Innovation Labs Help? , 2012 .

[38]  D. Osborne,et al.  Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming government. , 1992 .

[39]  R. Kattel,et al.  Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do? , 2017 .

[40]  Denis Saint-Martin,et al.  HOW THE REINVENTING GOVERNMENT MOVEMENT IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION WAS EXPORTED FROM THE U.S. TO OTHER COUNTRIES , 2001 .

[41]  P. '. Hart,et al.  A New Era for Think Tanks in Public Policy? International Trends, Australian Realities , 2008 .

[42]  Gerry Stoker,et al.  Design Experiments: Engaging Policy Makers in the Search for Evidence about What Works , 2009 .

[43]  Tim Kastelle,et al.  Public sector innovation research: What’s next? , 2010 .

[44]  Emma Clarence,et al.  Technocracy Reinvented: The New Evidence Based Policy Movement , 2002 .

[45]  E. Baekkeskov Explaining science-led policy-making: pandemic deaths, epistemic deliberation and ideational trajectories , 2016 .