Eyes wide open: Pupil size as a proxy for inhibition in the masked-priming paradigm

[1]  Albert Costa,et al.  Lying in a native and foreign language , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[2]  Jeffrey R. Spies,et al.  The Replication Recipe: What Makes for a Convincing Replication? , 2014 .

[3]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[5]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. , 2012 .

[6]  A. Morris,et al.  Orthographic similarity: The case of “reversed anagrams” , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Megan H. Papesh,et al.  Pupil-BLAH-metry: Cognitive effort in speech planning reflected by pupil dilation , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Pablo Gómez,et al.  Drawing attention to primes increases inhibitory word priming effects. , 2012 .

[9]  Colin J Davis,et al.  The spatial coding model of visual word identification. , 2010, Psychological review.

[10]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Masked priming from orthographic neighbors: an ERP investigation. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Timothy J Slattery,et al.  Word misperception, the neighbor frequency effect, and the role of sentence context: evidence from eye movements. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  S. Lupker,et al.  Sandwich priming: a method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  S. Lupker,et al.  Masked priming with orthographic neighbors: a test of the lexical competition assumption. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction , 2008 .

[15]  James A. Bovaird,et al.  On the use of multilevel modeling as an alternative to items analysis in psycholinguistic research , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[16]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[18]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Is masked neighbor priming inhibitory? Evidence using the incremental priming technique. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[19]  Lesa Hoffman,et al.  Multilevel models for the experimental psychologist: Foundations and illustrative examples , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[20]  Stephen J Lupker,et al.  Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  S. Lupker,et al.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  Factors underlying masked priming effects in competitive network models of visual word recognition , 2003 .

[23]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious Masked Priming Depends on Temporal Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[24]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .

[25]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[26]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[27]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. , 1999 .

[28]  D. Balota,et al.  Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  K I Forster,et al.  The prime lexicality effect: form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  M. Masson,et al.  Masked Repetition Priming of Words and Nonwords: Evidence for a Nonlexical Basis for Priming , 1997 .

[32]  Tamiko Azuma,et al.  Open wide and say blah! attentional dynamics of delayed naming , 1997 .

[33]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[34]  A. Jacobs,et al.  The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[37]  K. Forster.  Form-priming with masked primes: The best match hypothesis. , 1987 .

[38]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  J. Beatty.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[41]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[42]  B. Goldwater.  Psychological significance of pupillary movements. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .