Regional bond strengths of adhesive resins to pulp chamber dentin.

Microleakage of oral microorganisms, which can occur due to the lack of sealing ability of permanent restorative materials, may cause failure of root canal treatments. Although a great deal of research has been done on sealing enamel and coronal dentin with resins, little research has been done on the adhesion of resins to the walls of pulp chambers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate regional bond strengths of two adhesive systems to the walls of pulp chambers. A section was made horizontally through the middle of the pulp chamber of extracted human third molars to divide the chamber into upper and lower halves. The pulp tissue was removed and the tooth segments were then divided into treatment subgroups. The pulp chambers were bonded with C&B Metabond (Parkell) or One-Step (Bisco), with or without 5% NaOCI pretreatment. The microtensile bond strengths of these resins to four different pulp chamber regions (bottom, wall, roof, and pulp horn areas) were then measured using an Instron machine. The data were expressed in MPa and were analyzed by a three-way ANOVA. Statistically significant differences were found among the test groups (p < 0.001). One-Step produced higher bond strengths to all pulp chamber regions except the floor, compared with C&B Metabond. The results indicated that high bond strengths can be achieved between adhesive resins and the various regions of the pulp chamber. This should permit the use of a thick layer of unfilled resin along the floor of the pulp chamber and over the canal orifices as a secondary protective seal after finishing root canal therapy.

[1]  石川 達也,et al.  Dentin/Pulp Complex : proceedings of the International Conference on Dentin/Pulp Complex 2001 , 2002 .

[2]  R. Carvalho,et al.  Regional Measurement of Resin-Dentin Bonding as an Array , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[3]  M. Burrow,et al.  Effect of intrinsic wetness and regional difference on dentin bond strength. , 1999, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  D. Pashley,et al.  Nanoleakage at the dentin adhesive interface vs microtensile bond strength. , 1999, Operative dentistry.

[5]  D. Pashley,et al.  Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  D. Pashley,et al.  Hybridization of Dental Hard Tissues , 1998 .

[7]  J. Kanca,et al.  Bonding to dentin. Clues to the mechanism of adhesion. , 1998, American Journal of Dentistry.

[8]  G. Marshall,et al.  Adhesion between collagen depleted dentin and dentin adhesives. , 1998, American journal of dentistry.

[9]  J. C. Pereira,et al.  A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. , 1996, Operative dentistry.

[10]  R. Carvalho,et al.  Bond strength versus dentine structure: a modelling approach. , 1995, Archives of oral biology.

[11]  W. G. Matthews,et al.  Bond strengths to superficial, intermediate and deep dentin in vivo with four dentin bonding systems. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  P. Nair,et al.  Numerical density of dentinal tubules at the pulpal wall of human permanent premolars and third molars. , 1992, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  D. Pashley Clinical correlations of dentin structure and function. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  C. Davidson,et al.  Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. , 1990, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[15]  W. Douglas Clinical status of dentine bonding agents. , 1989, Journal of dentistry.

[16]  W. Finger,et al.  Dentin adhesives: site of dentin vs. bonding of composite resins. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[17]  W. Eakle Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored with Class II Bonded Composite Resin , 1986, Journal of dental research.

[18]  C. Davidson,et al.  The Competition between the Composite-Dentin Bond Strength and the Polymerization Contraction Stress , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[19]  N. Nakabayashi,et al.  The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. , 1982, Journal of biomedical materials research.