Comparison between two methane reforming models applied to a quasi-two-dimensional planar solid oxide fuel cell model

Up to recently 2-D solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) modelling efforts were based on global kinetic approaches for the methane steam reforming and water gas shift reactions (WGS) or thermodynamic equilibrium. Lately detailed models for elementary heterogeneous chemical kinetics of reforming (HCR) over Ni–YSZ anode became available in literature. Both approaches were employed in a quasi 2-D model of a planar high temperature electrolyte supported (ESC) SOFC and simulations were carried out for three different fuel gas compositions: pre-reformed natural gas (high CH4 content), and two different biomass derived producer gases (low CH4 content). The results show that the HCR predicts much slower reforming rates which leads to a more evenly distributed solid temperature but smaller power output and thus electrical efficiency. The two models result into predictions that differ greatly if high methane content fuels are used and for such cases the decision upon the modelling scheme to follow should be based on experimental investigations.

[1]  S. Campanari,et al.  Comparison of Finite Volume SOFC Models for the Simulation of a Planar Cell Geometry , 2005 .

[2]  Vincent Heuveline,et al.  Performance analysis of a SOFC under direct internal reforming conditions , 2007 .

[3]  M. Soroush,et al.  Mathematical modeling of solid oxide fuel cells: A review , 2011 .

[4]  Alberto Traverso,et al.  Modelling of Pressurised Hybrid Systems Based on Integrated Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (IP‐SOFC) Technology , 2005 .

[5]  E. Achenbach Three-dimensional and time-dependent simulation of a planar solid oxide fuel cell stack , 1994 .

[6]  S. Kakaç,et al.  A review of numerical modeling of solid oxide fuel cells , 2007 .

[7]  P. Glarborg,et al.  Chemically Reacting Flow : Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[8]  Vinod M. Janardhanan,et al.  Modeling Elementary Heterogeneous Chemistry and Electrochemistry in Solid-Oxide Fuel Cells , 2005 .

[9]  Vinod M. Janardhanan,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[10]  Aristide F. Massardo,et al.  Simplified Versus Detailed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Reactor Models and Influence on the Simulation of the Design Point Performance of Hybrid Systems , 2004 .

[11]  Ricardo Chacartegui,et al.  On the effect of methane internal reforming modelling in solid oxide fuel cells , 2008 .

[12]  O. Deutschmann,et al.  Methane reforming kinetics within a Ni–YSZ SOFC anode support , 2005 .

[13]  S. Campanari,et al.  Definition and sensitivity analysis of a finite volume SOFC model for a tubular cell geometry , 2004 .

[14]  E. Riensche,et al.  Methane/steam reforming kinetics for solid oxide fuel cells , 1994 .

[15]  Aristide F. Massardo,et al.  Design and part-load performance of a hybrid system based on a solid oxide fuel cell reactor and a micro gas turbine , 2001 .

[16]  U. Hohenwarter,et al.  High temperature electrolyte supported Ni-GDC/YSZ/LSM SOFC operation on two-stage Viking gasifier product gas , 2007 .

[17]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Finite-volume modeling and hybrid-cycle performance of planar and tubular solid oxide fuel cells , 2005 .