DeepBatch: A hybrid deep learning model for interpretable diagnosis of breast cancer in whole-slide images

CONTEXT: Advances in studies at the molecular and genetic sequencing have brought significant progress in understanding the behavior, treatment, and prognosis of breast cancer. However, the diagnosis of breast cancer in the early stages is still essential for successful treatment. Currently, the gold standard for breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management is a histological analysis of a suspected section. Histopathology consists of analyzing the characteristics of the lesions through sections of tissue stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin. However, pathologists are currently subjected to high workloads, mainly due to the fundamental role played by histological analysis in the treatment of the patient. In this context, applications that can reduce the time of histological analysis, provide a second opinion, or even point out suspicious locations as a screening tool can help the pathologist. OBJECTIVE: We envision two main challenges: the first, how to identify cancerous regions in Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) using Deep Learning (DL) with an accuracy comparable to the pathologist’s annotations, considered the gold standard in the literature. And second, how a DL-based model can provide an interpretable diagnosis. The scientific contribution consists in proposing a model based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to provide a refined and multi-class segmentation of WSI in breast cancer. METHODOLOGY: The methodology consists of proposing and developing a model called DeepBatch. The DeepBatch is divided into four modules: Preprocessing, ROI Detection, ROI Sampling, and Cell Segmentation. These modules are organized to decode the information learned using CNNs in interpretable predictions for pathologists. The Preprocessing module is responsible for removing background and noise from WSI. At ROI Detection, we use the U-Net convolutional architecture to identify suspicious regions in low magnification WSI. Suspected areas identified are mapped from low magnifications by ROI Sampling to 40× magnifications. Cell Segmentation then segments high-magnification areas. Segmentation is performed using a ResNet50/U-Net. To validate the DeepBatch, we use datasets from different sources that can be used together or separately in each module, depending on the module’s objective. RESULTS: The evaluations performed demonstrate the feasibility of the model. We assessed the impact of four-color spaces (RGB, HSV, YCrCb, and LAB) for multi-class segmentation of breast cancer WSI. We used 205 WSI of breast cancer for training, validation, and testing. For the detection of suspicious regions by ROI Detection we obtained a IoU of 93.43%, accuracy of 91.27%, sensitivity of 90.77%, specificity of 94.03%, F1-Score of 84.17%, and an AUC of 0.93. For the refined segmentation of WSI by the Cell Segmentation module we obtained a IoU of 88.23%, accuracy of 96.10%, sensitivity of 71.83%, specificity of 96.19%, F1 -Score of 82.94%, and an AUC of 0.86. CONCLUSION: As a contribution, DeepBatch provides refined segmentation of breast cancer WSIs using a cascade of CNNs. This segmentation helps the interpretation of the diagnosis by the pathologist, accurately presenting the regions considered during the inference of WSI. The results indicate the possibility of using the model as a second reading system.

[1]  Zhiguo Jiang,et al.  Histopathological Whole Slide Image Analysis Using Context-Based CBIR , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[3]  Luiz Eduardo Soares de Oliveira,et al.  Deep features for breast cancer histopathological image classification , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[4]  Mita Nasipuri,et al.  Patch-based system for Classification of Breast Histology images using deep learning , 2019, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  W. Yosef,et al.  Role of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Head and Neck Tumors , 2016 .

[7]  U. Singh,et al.  Nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from lowland rice cultivation with urea deep placement and alternate wetting and drying irrigation , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Angel Cruz-Roa,et al.  High-throughput adaptive sampling for whole-slide histopathology image analysis (HASHI) via convolutional neural networks: Application to invasive breast cancer detection , 2018, PloS one.

[9]  Luiz Eduardo Soares de Oliveira,et al.  Breast cancer histopathological image classification using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2016, 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[10]  Bin Luo,et al.  Timing Channel in IaaS: How to Identify and Investigate , 2018, IEEE Access.

[11]  Yuanjie Zheng,et al.  Breast Cancer Multi-classification from Histopathological Images with Structured Deep Learning Model , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Himanshu Mittal,et al.  An automatic nuclei segmentation method using intelligent gravitational search algorithm based superpixel clustering , 2019, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[13]  Friedhelm Schwenker,et al.  Survey of deep learning in breast cancer image analysis , 2019, Evolving Systems.

[14]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Context-aware stacked convolutional neural networks for classification of breast carcinomas in whole-slide histopathology images , 2017, Journal of medical imaging.

[15]  Linda G. Shapiro,et al.  Detection and classification of cancer in whole slide breast histopathology images using deep convolutional networks , 2018, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  J. Chan,et al.  The Wonderful Colors of the Hematoxylin–Eosin Stain in Diagnostic Surgical Pathology , 2014, International journal of surgical pathology.

[17]  Fátima de Lourdes dos Santos Nunes,et al.  Is mass classification in mammograms a solved problem? - A critical review over the last 20 years , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Pekka Matilainen,et al.  Evaluation of the confusion matrix method in the validation of an automated system for measuring feeding behaviour of cattle , 2018, Behavioural Processes.

[19]  Zhenbing Liu,et al.  Cell detection in pathology and microscopy images with multi-scale fully convolutional neural networks , 2018, World Wide Web.

[20]  Ziba Gandomkar,et al.  MuDeRN: Multi-category classification of breast histopathological image using deep residual networks , 2018, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[21]  Catarina Eloy,et al.  BACH: Grand Challenge on Breast Cancer Histology Images , 2018, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  Combo Loss: Handling Input and Output Imbalance in Multi-Organ Segmentation , 2018, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[23]  Hong Liu,et al.  A Fast and Refined Cancer Regions Segmentation Framework in Whole-slide Breast Pathological Images , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Angel Cruz-Roa,et al.  Mitosis detection in breast cancer pathology images by combining handcrafted and convolutional neural network features , 2014, Journal of medical imaging.

[25]  Gabriel Popescu,et al.  Label-free quantitative evaluation of breast tissue using Spatial Light Interference Microscopy (SLIM) , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  BreakHis based breast cancer automatic diagnosis using deep learning: Taxonomy, survey and insights , 2020, Neurocomputing.

[27]  Asifullah Khan,et al.  Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histopathology Images Using Hybrid Feature Space. , 2020, Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy.