The influence of incident management teams on the deployment of wildfire suppression resources

Despite large commitments of personnel and equipment to wildfire suppression, relatively little is known about the factors that affect how many resources are ordered and assigned to wildfire incidents and the variation in resources across incident management teams (IMTs). Using detailed data on suppression resource assignments for IMTs managing the highest complexity wildfire incidents (Type 1 and Type 2), this paper examines daily suppression resource use and estimates the variation in resource use between IMTs. Results suggest that after controlling for fire and landscape characteristics, and for higher average resource use on fires in California, differences between IMTs account for ~14% of variation in resource use. Of the 89 IMTs that managed fires from 2007 to 2011, 17 teams exhibited daily resource capacity that was significantly higher than resource use for the median team.

[1]  Donald G. MacGregor,et al.  Decision Modeling for Analyzing Fire Action Outcomes , 2011 .

[2]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Risk Preferences in Strategic Wildfire Decision Making: A Choice Experiment with U.S. Wildfire Managers , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[4]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[5]  K. Gebert,et al.  Effect of Suppression Strategies on Federal Wildland Fire Expenditures , 2012 .

[6]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  An Alternative Incentive Structure for Wildfire Management on National Forest Land , 2005 .

[7]  Jeffrey P. Prestemon,et al.  The economics of forest disturbances : wildfires, storms, and invasive species , 2008 .

[8]  Matthew P. Thompson.  Social, Institutional, and Psychological Factors Affecting Wildfire Incident Decision Making , 2014 .

[9]  David E. Calkin,et al.  Estimating Suppression Expenditures for Individual Large Wildland Fires , 2007 .

[10]  Lynn A Maguire,et al.  Managing Wildfire Events: Risk‐Based Decision Making Among a Group of Federal Fire Managers , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying the influence of previously burned areas on suppression effectiveness and avoided exposure: A case study of the Las Conchas Fire , 2016 .

[12]  D. Calkin,et al.  Factors influencing large wildland fire suppression expenditures , 2008 .

[13]  David E Calkin,et al.  Production and efficiency of large wildland fire suppression effort: A stochastic frontier analysis. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  K. Gebert,et al.  An econometric model for ex ante prediction of wildfire suppression costs , 2012 .

[15]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Risk Preferences, Probability Weighting, and Strategy Tradeoffs in Wildfire Management , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  M. Genton,et al.  The Production of Large and Small Wildfires , 2008 .

[17]  Lynn A. Maguire,et al.  Can behavioral decision theory explain risk-averse fire management decisions? , 2005 .

[18]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Estimating US federal wildland fire managers’ preferences toward competing strategic suppression objectives , 2013 .

[19]  Geoffrey H. Donovan,et al.  The Effect of Newspaper Coverage and Political Pressure on Wildfire Suppression Costs , 2011 .

[20]  David E. Calkin,et al.  External human factors in incident management team decisionmaking and their effect on large fire suppression expenditures , 2008 .

[21]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Modeling Containment of Large Wildfires Using Generalized Linear Mixed-Model Analysis , 2009, Forest Science.

[22]  A. González‐Cabán.  Managerial and institutional factors affect prescribed burning costs , 1997 .

[23]  David E. Calkin,et al.  Econometric analysis of fire suppression production functions for large wildland fires , 2013 .