Treatment of bone, joint, and vascular-access-associated gram-positive bacterial infections with teicoplanin

Teicoplanin, a glycopeptide antibiotic, was evaluated for safety and efficacy in the treatment of vascular-access-associated bacteremias and of bone and joint infections due to susceptible gram-positive organisms. Of 35 patients enrolled, 26 had osteomyelitis, 8 had vascular-access-associated bacteremias, and 1 had a joint infection. A total of 38 gram-positive isolates were identified: 23 Staphylococcus aureus and 6 coagulase-negative staphylococcus and 9 streptococcus isolates. After at least 6 months of follow-up, 17 patients were evaluable for efficacy: 10 of 14 (71%) with osteomyelitis and 3 of 3 with vascular-access-associated bacteremias had full resolution of their infections. Inadequate debridement, the presence of metal, and inadequate dosing were likely causes of two failures and two relapses in patients with osteomyelitis. For all but two organisms, teicoplanin MICs were less than or equal to 2 micrograms/ml. Patients who responded had median peak and trough serum bactericidal levels at serum dilutions of 1:64 and 1:16; trough levels of teicoplanin in serum were greater than 30 micrograms/ml. Patients did not respond as expected to daily doses of 4 mg/kg of body weight, which consequently were increased to greater than or equal to 15 mg/kg. Audiology testing of 20 patients found 2 with a mild loss of high-frequency hearing; 1 patient complained of tinnitus. Patients tolerated peak levels in serum as high as 127 micrograms/ml and trough levels of 49 micrograms/ml. However, 5 of 18 patients (28%) whose daily dose was greater than or equal to 12 mg/kg developed drug fever and rash and had teicoplanin discontinued. Further study of the antibiotic at such higher doses is needed.

[1]  Č. Beneš,et al.  Time-kill studies with oxacillin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin versus Staphylococcus aureus. , 1990, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[2]  E. Gorzynski,et al.  Comparative in vitro activities of teicoplanin, vancomycin, oxacillin, and other antimicrobial agents against bacteremic isolates of gram-positive cocci , 1989, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[3]  C. Santini,et al.  Teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive-bacterial endocarditis , 1989, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[4]  J. Cheesbrough,et al.  Randomized prospective study comparing vancomycin with teicoplanin in the treatment of infections associated with Hickman catheters , 1989, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[5]  P. Massip,et al.  Evaluation of teicoplanin for treatment of endocarditis caused by gram-positive cocci in 20 patients , 1989, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[6]  L. Cantoni,et al.  Comparative efficacy of amoxicillin-clavulanate, cloxacillin, and vancomycin against methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in rats. , 1989, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[7]  L. Peterson,et al.  Influence of protein binding on therapeutic efficacy of cefoperazone , 1989, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[8]  R. Auckenthaler,et al.  Early termination of a prospective, randomized trial comparing teicoplanin and flucloxacillin for treating severe staphylococcal infections. , 1987, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[9]  A. Corti,et al.  Comparison of the solid phase enzyme receptor assay (SPERA) and the microbiological assay for teicoplanin. , 1986, The Journal of hospital infection.

[10]  J. Thys,et al.  Clinical evaluation of teicoplanin for therapy of severe infections caused by gram-positive bacteria , 1986, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[11]  A. Corti,et al.  Teicoplanin, a new antibiotic from Actinoplanes teichomyceticus nov. sp , 1984, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[12]  J. Verhaegen,et al.  In vitro activity and human pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin , 1984, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  H. Neu,et al.  In vitro activity of teichomycin compared with those of other antibiotics , 1983, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  P. Granato,et al.  Comparison of the in vitro activities of teichomycin A2 and vancomycin against staphylococci and enterococci , 1982, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[15]  C. Stratton,et al.  Serum dilution test for bactericidal activity. II. Standardization and correlation with antimicrobial assays and susceptibility tests. , 1977, The Journal of infectious diseases.