Linking Tobacco Control Policies and Practices to Early Cancer Endpoints: Surveillance as an Agent for Change

State tobacco control programs provide an important laboratory for the development, implementation, and evaluation of comprehensive tobacco control interventions. Studies have shown that states and municipalities with aggressive tobacco control programs have experienced more rapid decreases in per capita cigarette sales, smoking prevalence, lung cancer, and heart disease than entities without such programs. Despite strong evidence that population-level interventions are critical in achieving large and sustained reductions in tobacco use, states do not fund tobacco control efforts at levels recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Research on the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of these activities is essential to inform and strengthen tobacco control at the state level. A workshop, co-organized by the American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute, the American Association for Cancer Research, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was held in Philadelphia in December, 2007, to discuss the topic “Linking tobacco control policies and practices to early cancer endpoints: surveillance as an agent for change.” Participants represented three different disciplines. Tobacco surveillance researchers described the data currently collected on state-level tobacco control policies, protobacco countermeasures by the industry, public attitudes toward tobacco use, and measures of smoking prevalence and consumption. Cancer registry experts described the geographic coverage of high quality, population-based cancer registries. Mathematical modeling experts discussed various modeling approaches that can be used to relate upstream tobacco promotion and control activities to downstream measures such as public attitudes, changes in tobacco use, and trends in tobacco-related diseases. The most important recommendation of the Workshop was a call for national leadership to enhance the collection and integration of data from multiple sources as a resource to further study and strengthen the scientific basis for tobacco control. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(9):2215–9)

[1]  C. Backinger,et al.  Developing consensus on tobacco control and research. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  A. Jemal,et al.  Lung cancer trends in young adults: an early indicator of progress in tobacco control (United States) , 2003, Cancer Causes & Control.

[3]  C. Cardinez,et al.  United States cancer statistics; 2003 incidence and mortality , 2006 .

[4]  E. Gilpin,et al.  The California Tobacco Control Program’s effect on adult smokers: (1) Smoking cessation , 2007, Tobacco Control.

[5]  Jack Homer,et al.  Modeling the Local Dynamics of Cardiovascular Health: Risk Factors, Context, and Capacity , 2008, Preventing chronic disease.

[6]  J. Slade,et al.  Nicotine addiction : principles and management , 1993 .

[7]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  State variation in retail promotions and advertising for Marlboro cigarettes , 2001, Tobacco control.

[8]  S. Glantz,et al.  Smoking in the Movies Increases Adolescent Smoking: A Review , 2005, Pediatrics.

[9]  David T Levy,et al.  Simulation modeling and tobacco control: creating more robust public health policies. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[10]  Angela Mariotto,et al.  Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) , 2001, Journal of Investigative Medicine.

[11]  Pamela I. Clark,et al.  Greater Than the Sum: Systems Thinking in Tobacco control , 2007 .

[12]  Xiao-Cheng Wu,et al.  Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2005, Featuring Trends in Lung Cancer, Tobacco Use, and Tobacco Control , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  Mark S. Clements,et al.  Multistage Carcinogenesis and Lung Cancer Mortality in Three Cohorts , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[14]  T. Pechacek,et al.  The impact of tobacco control programs on adult smoking. , 2008, American journal of public health.

[15]  Kathleen Stratton,et al.  Ending the tobacco problem : a blueprint for the nation , 2007 .

[16]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Evaluation of the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST): a report of outcomes. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  Office on Smoking Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs , 1999 .

[18]  E KoplanKate,et al.  Smoking Cessation , 2000 .

[19]  G. Giovino,et al.  The tobacco epidemic in the United States. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  K. Lohr,et al.  Tobacco use: prevention, cessation, and control. , 2006, Evidence report/technology assessment.