The Utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

An evaluation of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is made using a “unified view” of test validity (e.g., Messick, 1981). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is an assessment of personality based on Jung’s theory of types. During the past decade, the test has received considerable attention and use in a variety of applied settings. The unified view of validation requires that validity be considered as an approach that requires many sources of corroboration. This procedure contrasts with previous procedures that tended to focus on single validation procedures (e.g., construct validation). A review of the available literature suggests that there is insufficient evidence to support the tenets of and claims about the utility of the test.

[1]  R. Owens In the mind's eye: Enhancing human performance , 1993 .

[2]  Paul D. Tieger,et al.  Do What You Are: Discover the Perfect Career for You Through the Secrets of Personality Type , 1992 .

[3]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[4]  P. Meehl Factors and Taxa, Traits and Types, Differences of Degree and Differences in Kind , 1992 .

[5]  L. Atwater,et al.  Using MBTI to Understand Transformational Leadership and Self-Perception Accuracy , 1992 .

[6]  Daniel Druckman,et al.  In the Mind's Eye: Enhancing Human Performance , 1992 .

[7]  S. Cooper,et al.  Mbti Learning Style-Teaching Style Discongruencies , 1991 .

[8]  D. R. Saunders,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator-Expanded Analysis Report , 1990 .

[9]  J. B. Murray Review of Research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1990 .

[10]  Timothy J. Rollins Analysis of Theoretical Relationships between Learning Styles of Students and Their Preferences for Learning Activities. , 1990 .

[11]  R. G. Hunt,et al.  Cognitive style and decision making , 1989 .

[12]  Susan A. Richardson,et al.  A Teambuilding Model: Appreciating Differences Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator with Developmental Theory. , 1989 .

[13]  P. Costa,et al.  Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. , 1989, Journal of personality.

[14]  G. Sipps,et al.  Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a Measure of Sociability and Impulsivity , 1988 .

[15]  K. Schurr,et al.  Relationships of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Personality Characteristics and Self-Reported Academic Problems and Skill Ratings with Scholastic Aptitude Test Scores , 1988 .

[16]  R. Alexander,et al.  The Multifactorial Nature of Extraversion-Introversion in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Eysenck Personality Inventory , 1987 .

[17]  M. Mccaulley,et al.  Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Atlas of Type Tables , 1987 .

[18]  B. Thompson,et al.  Construct Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1986 .

[19]  Ralph A. Alexander,et al.  Item Analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[20]  William G. Graziano,et al.  Extraversion, social cognition, and the salience of aversiveness in social encounters. , 1985 .

[21]  I. W. Kelly,et al.  The ‘Barnum Effect’ in Personality Assessment: A Review of the Literature , 1985 .

[22]  S. Scarr,et al.  The Measurement of Three Lifestyle Values: Resourcefulness, Responsibility and Relationships to others , 1985 .

[23]  I. B. Myers Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[24]  D. Schweiger Measuring managerial cognitive styles: On the logical validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[25]  E. Loftus,et al.  Eyewitness performance in different psychological types. , 1985, The Journal of general psychology.

[26]  Janice Mill,et al.  High and low self‐monitoring individuals: Their decoding skills and empathic expression , 1984 .

[27]  L. E. Hicks Conceptual and Empirical Analysis of Some Assumptions of an Explicitly Typological Theory , 1984 .

[28]  D. Ozer,et al.  Two types of psychologists: Remarks on the Mendelsohn, Weiss, and Feimer contribution. , 1982 .

[29]  Samuel Messick,et al.  Constructs and their vicissitudes in educational and psychological measurement. , 1981 .

[30]  H. Eysenck A Model for Personality , 1981 .

[31]  S. Messick Test validity and the ethics of assessment. , 1980 .

[32]  R. Guion,et al.  On Trinitarian doctrines of validity. , 1980 .

[33]  Mark Snyder,et al.  On Translating Beliefs Into Action: Theories of Ability and Their Application in an Instructional Setting , 1980 .

[34]  R. Carlson Studies of Jungian typology: II. Representations of the personal world. , 1980 .

[35]  Arnold H. Buss,et al.  An analysis of the Self-Monitoring Scale. , 1980 .

[36]  James E. Covington Jackson Vocational Interest Survey , 1979 .

[37]  W. Swann,et al.  Hypothesis-Testing Processes in Social Interaction , 1978 .

[38]  T. Carskadon,et al.  Test-Retest Reliabilities of Continuous Scores on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1977 .

[39]  M. Snyder On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes. , 1977 .

[40]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  The self-monitor looks at the ingratiator1 , 1976 .

[41]  R. S. Steele,et al.  Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and Jungian Myers-Briggs Type Indicator correlation of extraversion-introversion. , 1976, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[42]  J. A. Wakefield,et al.  Validity Study of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire , 1976 .

[43]  J. Rotter Some Problems and Misconceptions Related to the Construct of Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement , 1975 .

[44]  M. Snyder Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[45]  J. Cooper,et al.  Dissonance produced by deviations from life styles: the interaction of Jungian typology and conformity. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  N. Levy,et al.  Studies of Jungian typology. I. Memory, social perception, and social action. , 1973, Journal of personality.

[47]  D. Rosenhan On being sane in insane places , 1973, Science.

[48]  E. Barratt,et al.  Factor Analysis of Some Psychometric Measures of Impulsiveness and Anxiety , 1965, Psychological reports.

[49]  S. C. Webb An Analysis of the Scoring System of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1964 .

[50]  J. Ross,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF SOME STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF THE JUNGIAN PERSONALITY TYPOLOGY. , 1962, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[51]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  H. Trice Book Note and Review: Personnel: The Psychology of Careers: An Introduction to Vocational Development , 1958 .

[53]  A. Tellegen,et al.  Occupational interests, leisure time interests and personality: Three domains or one? Findings from the Minnesota Twin Registry: New concepts, methods, and findings , 1995 .

[54]  L. R. Goldberg The structure of phenotypic personality traits. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[55]  Paul D. Tieger,et al.  Personality Typing: A First Step to a Satisfying Career. , 1993 .

[56]  The five-factor model: issues and applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[57]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Personality: structure and assessment. , 1992, Annual review of psychology.

[58]  William Bridges,et al.  The character of organizations : using Jungian type in organizational development , 1992 .

[59]  A. Furnham Personality at work : the role of individual differences in the workplace , 1992 .

[60]  Annamaria Garden Unresolved Issues with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1991 .

[61]  M. Lorr An empirical evaluation of the MBTI typology , 1991 .

[62]  J. M. Digman PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[63]  M. Mccaulley The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and leadership. , 1990 .

[64]  Barbara Webb Type-Casting: Life with Myers-Briggs. , 1990 .

[65]  C. Peter Herman,et al.  Applications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Higher Education. , 1988 .

[66]  B. Thompson,et al.  Second-Order Factor Structure of the MBTI: A Construct Validity Assessment , 1986 .

[67]  James V. Mitchell The ninth mental measurements yearbook , 1985 .

[68]  Nickolaus R. Feimer,et al.  Reply to the comments of Block and Ozer. , 1982 .

[69]  Nickolaus R. Feimer,et al.  Conceptual and empirical analysis of the typological implications of patterns of socialization and femininity. , 1982 .

[70]  A. Sockloff,et al.  Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: (revised edition), by Jacob Cohen. New York: Academic Press, 1977, xv + 474 pp., $24.50. , 1978 .

[71]  A. Buss,et al.  A Temperament Theory of Personality Development , 1975 .

[72]  K. Barton The Prediction of School Grades from Personality and IQ Measures. , 1971 .

[73]  Sidney Siegel Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences , 1956 .