Impact of applied voltage on methane generation and microbial activities in an anaerobic microbial electrolysis cell (MEC)

Abstract The microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) is a promising technology for anaerobic wastewater treatment and energy recovery. Applied voltage affects the activities of microorganisms in MEC and further impacts methane generation. Therefore, we explored the effects of applied voltages on the performance of MEC and the microbial activities under anaerobic conditions. With COD concentration of 2–3 g/L in influent, COD removal efficiency and methane yield increased when the applied voltage was lower than 0.8 V and decreased when the applied voltage was 1.0 and 2.0 V. Lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), as an indicator for cell rupture, its activity increased 14% and 10% under 1.0 and 2.0 V in anode and increased 35% and 41% in cathode, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), as an indicator for metabolism, its activity decreased sharply, 27% and 55% in anode while 46% and 66% in cathode, under the two voltages respectively, comparing to the control. Results indicated that the higher voltage led to the greater plasmatorrhexis, lower growth rate and lower metabolic activity. The destroyed cell membrance resulted in slower growth and metabolism rate, which meant the decrease of COD removal efficiency and methane yield, when the voltage higher than 0.8 V conditions. In conclusion, the optimal applied voltage for wastewater treatment was 0.8 V. Information provided will be useful to design reactor and maintain industry practice.

[1]  Hubertus V M Hamelers,et al.  Effect of operational parameters on Coulombic efficiency in bioelectrochemical systems. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[2]  P. Mccarty,et al.  Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications , 2000 .

[3]  Hui Wang,et al.  Effect of Direct Electric Current on the Cell Surface Properties of Phenol-Degrading Bacteria , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[4]  Jizhong Zhou,et al.  Characterization of microbial communities during anode biofilm reformation in a two-chambered microbial electrolysis cell (MEC). , 2012, Journal of biotechnology.

[5]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Food and agricultural wastes as substrates for bioelectrochemical system (BES): The synchronized recovery of sustainable energy and waste treatment , 2015 .

[6]  Zhenguo Liu,et al.  Cell membrane damage is involved in the impaired survival of bone marrow stem cells by oxidized low-density lipoprotein , 2014, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[7]  M. M. Kekez,et al.  Contribution to the biophysics of the lethal effects of electric field on microorganisms. , 1996, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  N. Ren,et al.  Characterization of methane production and microbial community shifts during waste activated sludge degradation in microbial electrolysis cells. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[9]  Q. Mahmood,et al.  Effects of nanoscale zero-valent iron particles on biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal and microorganisms in activated sludge. , 2013, Journal of hazardous materials.

[10]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[11]  Akira Mizuno,et al.  Destruction of Living Cells by Pulsed High Voltage Application , 1986, 1986 Annual Meeting Industry Applications Society.

[12]  K. Sasaki,et al.  Bioelectrochemical system accelerates microbial growth and degradation of filter paper , 2010, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[13]  Mauro Majone,et al.  Bioelectrochemical reduction of CO(2) to CH(4) via direct and indirect extracellular electron transfer by a hydrogenophilic methanogenic culture. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[14]  Deepak Pant,et al.  Carbon dioxide reduction by mixed and pure cultures in microbial electrosynthesis using an assembly of graphite felt and stainless steel as a cathode. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[15]  Maria E. Mycielska,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of direct-current electric field effects: galvanotaxis and metastatic disease , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[16]  S. Sastry,et al.  Effect of moderate electric field frequency and growth stage on the cell membrane permeability of Lactobacillus acidophilus , 2009, Biotechnology progress.

[17]  Zhong Fangli.  The effects of direct electric current on the metabolism of nitrifying bacteria , 2001 .

[18]  Kyu-Jung Chae,et al.  Selective inhibition of methanogens for the improvement of biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells , 2010 .

[19]  C. Sorlini,et al.  Effects of low electric current (LEC) treatment on pure bacterial cultures , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[20]  Karsten Zengler,et al.  A logical data representation framework for electricity-driven bioproduction processes. , 2015, Biotechnology advances.

[21]  O. Holm‐Hansen,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE IN THE OCEAN AND ITS ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE1 , 1966 .

[22]  Ralf Cord-Ruwisch,et al.  Novel methanogenic rotatable bioelectrochemical system operated with polarity inversion. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  E I Garvie,et al.  Bacterial lactate dehydrogenases. , 1980, Microbiological reviews.

[24]  Bruce E Logan,et al.  Direct biological conversion of electrical current into methane by electromethanogenesis. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  K. Sasaki,et al.  A bioelectrochemical reactor containing carbon fiber textiles enables efficient methane fermentation from garbage slurry. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[26]  T. Ginn,et al.  Anaerobic microbial growth near thermodynamic equilibrium as a function of ATP/ADP cycle: The effect of maintenance energy requirements , 2013 .

[27]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Microbial electrolysis cells turning to be versatile technology: recent advances and future challenges. , 2014, Water research.

[28]  Bruce E Logan,et al.  Microbial electrolysis cells for high yield hydrogen gas production from organic matter. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.