Quality in Supply Chain Encroachment

We study a supply chain with manufacturer encroachment in which product quality is endogenous and customers have heterogeneous preferences for quality. It is known that, when quality is exogenous, encroachment could make the retailer better off. Yet, when quality is endogenous and the manufacturer has enough flexibility in adjusting quality, we find that encroachment always makes the retailer worse off in a large variety of scenarios. We also establish that, while a higher manufacturer’s cost of quality hurts the retailer in absence of encroachment, it could benefit the retailer with encroachment. In addition, we show that a manufacturer offering differentiated products through two channels prefers to sell its high-quality product through the direct channel. Contrary to conventional wisdom, quality differentiation does not always benefit either manufacturer or retailer. Our results may explain why, despite extant theoretical predictions, retailers almost always resent encroachment. These findings also suggest that firms must be cautious when adopting quality differentiation as a strategy to ease channel conflict caused by encroachment.

[1]  A. Barbosa‐Póvoa Supply chain , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM).

[2]  Xiaowei Xu,et al.  Optimal Price and Product Quality Decisions in a Distribution Channel , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Boiling Frogs: Pricing Strategies for a Manufacturer Adding a Direct Channel that Competes with the Traditional Channel , 2006 .

[4]  U. Ronnen,et al.  Minimum Quality Standards, Fixed Costs, and Competition , 2011 .

[5]  Ming Fan,et al.  A supply chain model with direct and retail channels , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Panagiotis Kouvelis,et al.  Quality-Based Competition, Profitability, and Variable Costs , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Quality Choice and Vertical Integration , 1997 .

[8]  S. Gilbert,et al.  Supplier Encroachment as an Enhancement or a Hindrance to Nonlinear Pricing , 2015 .

[9]  J. M. Villas-Boas Product Line Design for a Distribution Channel , 1998 .

[10]  ChiangWei-yu Kevin,et al.  Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design , 2003 .

[11]  D. Sappington,et al.  The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment , 2007 .

[12]  Zhuoxin Li,et al.  Supplier Encroachment under Asymmetric Information , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Steven M. Shugan,et al.  Managing Channel Profits , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[14]  Massimo Motta,et al.  Endogenous Quality Choice: Price vs. Quantity Competition , 1993 .

[15]  George Cybenko Boiling Frogs? , 2003, IEEE Secur. Priv..

[16]  Hongyan Shi,et al.  Consumer Heterogeneity, Product Quality, and Distribution Channels , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[17]  A. Tsay,et al.  Channel Conflict and Coordination in the E‐Commerce Age , 2004 .

[18]  G. Cai,et al.  Channel Selection and Coordination in Dual-Channel Supply Chains , 2010 .

[19]  K. Moorthy Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design , 1984 .

[20]  Ulrich Lehmann-Grube,et al.  Strategic Choice of Quality When Quality is Costly: The Persistence of the High-Quality Advantage , 1997 .

[21]  Christine B. Bucklin,et al.  Channel Conflict: When Is It Dangerous? , 1997 .

[22]  I. Png,et al.  Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions , 1992 .

[23]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[24]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly , 1988 .