Cholinergic modulation of frequency receptive fields in auditory cortex: II. Frequency‐specific effects of anticholinesterases provide evidence for a modulatory action of endogenous Ach

Exogenously applied muscarinic agonists—for example, acetylcholine (ACh) and acetyl‐beta‐methacholine (MCh)—modify frequency receptive fields in auditory cortex of unanesthetized animals in a frequency‐specific rather than global manner. The present study sought to relate these findings to endogenous actions of ACh by using the anticholinesterase agents eserine sulphate and soman (0‐1,2,2‐trimethylpropylmethylphosphonofluoridate) to facilitate the effects of endogenous ACh. Frequency receptive fields (FRF) were determined by presenting sequences of different isointensity tones before, during, and after application of ACh, MCh, eserine, or soman; also the cholinesterase blockers were applied between applications of ACh or MCh. The major effects produced by the inhibitors were similar to those of the agonists. Predominant effects were frequency‐specific changes in FRF. Further, eserine and soman, similar to ACh and MCh, produced shifts in the best frequency (BF) of FRF due mainly to coordinated depression of responses to the BF and increased responses to adjacent, non‐BF. The results indicate that exogenous and endogenous ACh, acting via muscarinic receptors, can significantly influence the physiological functioning of cortical neurons and consequently their processing of sensory information.

[1]  K. Krnjević,et al.  Acetylcholine‐sensitive cells in the cerebral cortex , 1963, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Classical conditioning rapidly induces specific changes in frequency receptive fields of single neurons in secondary and ventral ectosylvian auditory cortical fields , 1986, Brain Research.

[3]  R. Dykes,et al.  Transient and prolonged effects of acetylcholine on responsiveness of cat somatosensory cortical neurons. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  John P. Donoghue,et al.  Cholinergic modulation of sensory responses in rat primary somatic sensory cortex , 1987, Brain Research.

[5]  A. Brossi,et al.  Activation and Blockade of the Nicotinic and Glutamatergic Synapses by Reversible and Irreversible Cholinesterase Inhibitors , 1987 .

[6]  J. Ashe,et al.  Differential and selective antagonism of the slow-inhibitory postsynaptic potential and slow-excitatory postsynaptic potential by gallamine and pirenzepine in the superior cervical ganglion of the rabbit , 1984, Neuropharmacology.

[7]  C. Woody,et al.  Correlated effects of acetylcholine and cyclic guanosine monophosphate on membrane properties of mammalian neocortical neurons. , 1979, Journal of neurobiology.

[8]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Role of context in the expression of learning-induced plasticity of single neurons in auditory cortex. , 1989 .

[9]  D. Diamond,et al.  Initial events in conditioning: Plasticity in the pupillomotor and auditory systems , 1984 .

[10]  M. Segal Multiple actions of acetylcholine at a muscarinic receptor studied in the rat hippocampal slice , 1982, Brain Research.

[11]  T. Tsumoto,et al.  A functional role of cholinergic innervation to neurons in the cat visual cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Responses of neurons in auditory cortex of the macaque monkey to monaural and binaural stimulation. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  D. Prince,et al.  Ionic mechanisms of cholinergic excitation in mammalian hippocampal pyramidal cells , 1982, Brain Research.

[14]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Neurons in the cat's primary auditory cortex distinguished by their responses to tones and wide-spectrum noise , 1985, Hearing Research.

[15]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Single-unit activity in the primary auditory cortex of unanesthetized cats. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  K. Krnjević,et al.  The mechanism of excitation by acetylcholine in the cerebral cortex , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  T J Teyler,et al.  The neurophysiology of learning. , 1972, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  R. Dykes,et al.  The effects of acetylcholine on response properties of cat somatosensory cortical neurons. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  D. McCormick,et al.  Two types of muscarinic response to acetylcholine in mammalian cortical neurons. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  R. Dykes,et al.  Acetylcholine permits long-term enhancement of neuronal responsiveness in cat primary somatosensory cortex , 1987, Neuroscience.

[21]  N. Weinberger,et al.  Muscarinic agonists modulate spontaneous and evoked unit discharge in auditory cortex of cat , 1988, Synapse.

[22]  N. Weinberger,et al.  Cholinergic modulation of frequency receptive fields in auditory cortex: I. Frequency‐specific effects of muscarinic agonists , 1989, Synapse.

[23]  A. Sillito,et al.  Cholinergic modulation of the functional organization of the cat visual cortex , 1983, Brain Research.

[24]  D. Prince,et al.  Acetylcholine induced modulation of hippocampal pyramidal neurons , 1981, Brain Research.

[25]  D. Brown M-currents: an update , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  D. Diamond,et al.  Role of context in the expression of learning-induced plasticity of single neurons in auditory cortex. , 1989, Behavioral neuroscience.

[27]  D. McCormick,et al.  Mechanisms of action of acetylcholine in the guinea‐pig cerebral cortex in vitro. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  N. Weinberger,et al.  Acetylcholine produces stimulus-specific receptive field alterations in cat auditory cortex , 1989, Brain Research.

[29]  E. Kandel,et al.  Cellular neurophysiological approaches in the study of learning. , 1968, Physiological reviews.

[30]  R. Nicoll,et al.  Voltage clamp analysis of cholinergic action in the hippocampus , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  R. Nicoll,et al.  Control of the repetitive discharge of rat CA 1 pyramidal neurones in vitro. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  D Sutton,et al.  Single Cell Activity in the Auditory Cortex of Rhesus Monkeys: Behavioral Dependency , 1972, Science.

[33]  R. Nicoll,et al.  Characterization of a slow cholinergic post‐synaptic potential recorded in vitro from rat hippocampal pyramidal cells. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  J. Ashe,et al.  Antagonist discrimination of two muscarinic responses elicited by applied agonists and orthodromic stimuli in superior cervical ganglion of rabbit , 1987, Neuropharmacology.