The Impact of Visual Field Loss on Driving Performance: Evidence From On-Road Driving Assessments

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between visual field loss and driving performance as determined by on-road driving assessments. Methods. We reviewed the files of 1350 patients enrolled in a rehabilitation program at the Bloorview MacMillan Rehabilitation Centre, Toronto, Canada. We identified 131 patients with visual field loss who had undergone an on-road driving assessment. These patients had a primary diagnosis of visual impairment or a primary diagnosis of cerebral vascular accident (CVA) with a secondary diagnosis of visual impairment. None of these patients had documentation of neglect, substantial motor or cognitive deficits. We report the data obtained from 13 hemianopics, 7 quadrantanopics, 25 patients with monocular vision, 10 patients with moderate peripheral losses (<135° of horizontal visual field measured at the midline), and 76 patients with mild peripheral losses (between 135° and 186° of horizontal visual field). The on-road assessment consisted of driving in the area surrounding the rehabilitation center, and the outcome was based on performance on a number of tasks commonly encountered in daily driving. For the purposes of this study, the assessment outcomes were classified as safe, unknown, or unsafe. Results. Overall, the extent of visual field loss did not have a significant impact on driving performance (&khgr;2 = 4.37, p = 0.358). However, hemianopia tended to have a worse impact on driving performance than quadrantanopia with a marginally significant result (&khgr;2 = 3.33, p = 0.068). Overall, the location of the visual loss was not significantly related to driving fitness (&khgr;2 = 1.05, p = 0.30). However, localized defects in the left hemifield (&khgr;2 = 9.561, p = 0.002) and diffuse visual loss in the right hemifield (&khgr;2 = 10.395, p = 0.001) seemed to be associated with driving impairments. A large proportion of monocular drivers were safe drivers and the location of their deficit had no significant impact. Conclusions. Although the extent of visual field defects appears to be related to driving performance as determined by an on-road driving assessment, large individual differences were observed. This highlights the need for individualized on-road assessments for patients with visual field defects.

[1]  A. Ostfeld,et al.  Driving cessation and changes in mileage driven among elderly individuals. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[2]  R W DANIELSON,et al.  The relationship of fields of vision to safety in driving; with a report of 680 drivers examined by various screening methods. , 1957, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[3]  J. Szlyk,et al.  Driving Performance of Glaucoma Patients Correlates With Peripheral Visual Field Loss , 2005, Journal of glaucoma.

[4]  B Esterman,et al.  Functional scoring of the binocular field. , 1982, Ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Wood,et al.  The effect of artificial visual impairment on functional visual fields and driving performance , 1993 .

[6]  C. Owsley,et al.  Vision and Driving in the Elderly , 1994, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Visual localization: age and practice. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  G T Plant,et al.  Epilepsy surgery, visual fields, and driving: a study of the visual field criteria for driving in patients after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery with a comparison of Goldmann and Esterman perimetry , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention. Further evidence based on ipsilateral neglect. , 1987, Archives of neurology.

[10]  A J McKnight,et al.  The visual and driving performance of monocular and binocular heavy-duty truck drivers. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  R. Calvanio,et al.  Acquired brain injury, visual attention, and the useful field of view test: A pilot study. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  I Gelinas,et al.  Use of the UFOV to evaluate and retrain visual attention skills in clients with stroke: a pilot study. , 2001, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[13]  Mark Mapstone,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric specialization for spatial attention: spatial distribution of search-related eye fixations in the absence of neglect , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  J. Wood,et al.  Age and Visual Impairment Decrease Driving Performance as Measured on a Closed-Road Circuit , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[15]  G. T. Cashell.  Visual function in relation to road accidents. , 1970, Injury.

[16]  C. Owsley,et al.  PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE EYE , 2022 .

[17]  R. Deyo,et al.  Generic and Disease-Specific Measures in Assessing Health Status and Quality of Life , 1989, Medical care.

[18]  M. Sivak.  The Information That Drivers Use: Is it Indeed 90% Visual? , 1996, Perception.

[19]  M. Sloane,et al.  Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. , 1998, JAMA.

[20]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Development of a Test Battery to Identify Older Drivers at Risk for Self‐Reported Adverse Driving Events , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[21]  D. Roth,et al.  Relation of Useful Field of View and other Screening Tests to on-Road Driving Performance , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[22]  K. Ball,et al.  Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  A. Schachat,et al.  Impact of enucleation for choroidal melanoma on the performance of vision-dependent activities. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  K. Ball,et al.  Vision impairment, eye disease, and injurious motor vehicle crashes in the elderly. , 1998, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[25]  Sharon Wood-Dauphinee,et al.  Effectiveness of a visual attention retraining program on the driving performance of clients with stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  L Staplin,et al.  Retrospective evaluation of alternative vision screening criteria for older and younger drivers. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  G. Fishman,et al.  Driving performance of retinitis pigmentosa patients. , 1981, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  C. Johnson,et al.  Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance. , 1983, Archives of ophthalmology.

[29]  Mary K. Janke,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF VISUALLY IMPAIRED HEAVY-VEHICLE OPERATORS , 1992 .

[30]  R Troutbeck,et al.  Effect of restriction of the binocular visual field on driving performance , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[31]  M. Brigell,et al.  Effects of Age and Hemianopic Visual Field Loss on Driving , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  E. Casson,et al.  Vision standards for driving in Canada and the United States. A review for the Canadian Ophthalmological Society. , 2000, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[33]  D. Roenker,et al.  Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[34]  J. Wood,et al.  Elderly Drivers and Simulated Visual Impairment , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[35]  J. Szlyk,et al.  Assessment of driving performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.