The Unworkable Interface
暂无分享,去创建一个
Interfaces are back, or perhaps they never left. The familiar So cratic conceit, from the Phaedrus, of communication as the process of writing directly on the soul of the other has, since the 1980s and 1990s, returned to center stage in the discourse around culture and media. The catoptrics of the society of the spectacle is now the dioptrics of the society of control. Reflective surfaces have been overthrown by transparent thresholds. The metal detector arch, or the graphics frustum, or the Unix socket?these are the new emblems of the age. Windows, doors, airport gates, and other thresholds are those trans parent devices that achieve more the less they do: for every moment of virtuosic immersion and connectivity, for every moment of volumetric delivery, of inopacity, the threshold becomes one notch more invisible, one notch more inoperable. As technology, the more a dioptric device erases the traces of its own functioning (in actually delivering the thing represented beyond), the more it succeeds in its functional mandate; yet this very achievement undercuts the ultimate goal: the more intui tive a device becomes, the more it risks falling out of media altogether, becoming as naturalized as air or as common as dirt. To succeed, then, is at best self-deception and at worst self-annihilation. One must work hard to cast the glow of unwork. Operability engenders inoperability. Curiously this is not a chronological, spatial, or even semiotic relation. It is primarily a systemic relation, as Michel Serres rightly observed in his meditation on functional "alongsidedness": "Systems work because they don't work. Non-functionality remains essential for functionality. This can be formalized: pretend there are two stations exchanging messages through a channel. If the exchange succeeds?if it is perfect, optimal, immediate?then the relation erases itself. But if the relation remains
[1] J. Huizinga. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture , 1938 .
[2] Diane Gromala,et al. Windows and Mirrors - Interaction Design, Digital Art, and the Myth of Transparency , 2003 .
[3] J. Rancière. Le partage du sensible : esthétique et politique , 2000 .
[4] S. Žižek,et al. The politics of aesthetics : the distribution of the sensible , 2006 .
[5] A. Friedberg. The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft , 2006 .