Perceived regularity of a texture is influenced by the regularity of a surrounding texture

Previous studies have shown that texture regularity is adaptable, and have suggested that texture regularity might be coded by the peakedness of the underlying spatial frequency distribution. Here we demonstrate the related phenomenon of simultaneous regularity contrast (SRC), in which the perceived regularity of a central texture is influenced by the regularity of a surrounding texture. We presented center-surround arrangements of textures and measured the perceived regularity of the centre, using a centre-only comparison stimulus and a 2AFC procedure. From the resulting psychometric functions the SRC was measured as the difference between test and comparison regularity at the PSE (point of subjective equality). Observers generally exhibited asymmetric bidirectional SRC, in that more regular surrounds decreased the perceived regularity of the centre by between 20–40%, while less regular surrounds increased the perceived regularity of the centre by about 10%. Consistent with previous studies, a wavelet spatial frequency (SF) analysis of the stimuli revealed that their SF distributions became sharper with increased regularity, and therefore that distribution statistics such as kurtosis and SF bandwidth might be used to code regularity.

[1]  Benoit Cottereau,et al.  Dynamics of perceptual decisions about symmetry in visual cortex , 2018, NeuroImage.

[2]  J. Gibson The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[3]  Brian Roberts,et al.  The Roles of Inducer Size and Distance in the Ebbinghaus Illusion (Titchener Circles) , 2005, Perception.

[4]  R. F Hess,et al.  How many positions can we perceptually encode, one or many? , 2003, Vision Research.

[5]  M A Georgeson,et al.  The effect of spatial adaptation on perceived contrast. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[6]  P. Green,et al.  Measuring perceived differences in surface texture due to changes in higher order statistics. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  Colin W G Clifford,et al.  The tilt illusion: Phenomenology and functional implications , 2014, Vision Research.

[8]  J. Gibson The perception of visual surfaces. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[9]  David C. Knill,et al.  Surface orientation from texture: ideal observers, generic observers and the information content of texture cues , 1998, Vision Research.

[10]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Obligatory encoding of task-irrelevant features depletes working memory resources. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[11]  E. G. Heinemann,et al.  Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing and test-field luminances. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  N Ginsburg,et al.  Effect of Item Arrangement on Perceived Numerosity: Randomness vs Regularity , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Quantifying density cues in grouping displays , 2016, Vision Research.

[14]  Peter A. van der Helm,et al.  Weber-Fechner behavior in symmetry perception? , 2010 .

[15]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Spatial arrangement in texture discrimination and texture segregation , 2013, i-Perception.

[16]  Roger W Remington,et al.  Segmentation by depth does not always facilitate visual search. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[17]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  The common perceptual metric for human discrimination of number and density , 2011 .

[18]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[19]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Individual differences in enhancement and suppression effects , 1993, Vision Research.

[20]  Takahiro Kawabe,et al.  Pattern randomness aftereffect , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Frederick A A Kingdom,et al.  Simultaneous density contrast is bidirectional. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[22]  S. Klein,et al.  The simultaneous spatial frequency shift: a dissociation between the detection and perception of gratings. , 1974, Vision research.

[23]  C. Baker,et al.  Texture density adaptation can be bidirectional. , 2017, Journal of vision.

[24]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[25]  D. Mackay,et al.  Lateral Interaction between Neural Channels sensitive to Texture Density? , 1973, Nature.

[26]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Aftereffect of perceived regularity. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[27]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[28]  Lewis D. Griffin,et al.  An absolute interval scale of order for point patterns , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[29]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Different symmetries, different mechanisms. , 2018, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[30]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  A. Norcia,et al.  Representation of Maximally Regular Textures in Human Visual Cortex , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Hiroshi Ban,et al.  A non-device-specific approach to display characterization based on linear, nonlinear, and hybrid search algorithms. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[33]  Steven M. Thurman,et al.  A comparison of form processing involved in the perception of biological and nonbiological movements , 2016, Journal of vision.

[34]  Norma V. Graham,et al.  Beyond multiple pattern analyzers modeled as linear filters (as classical V1 simple cells): Useful additions of the last 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[35]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[36]  J A Solomon,et al.  Texture interactions determine perceived contrast , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  J A Solomon,et al.  Perceived pattern regularity computed as a summary statistic: implications for camouflage , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Lewis D. Griffin,et al.  Difference magnitude is not measured by discrimination steps for order of point patterns. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[39]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A common visual metric for approximate number and density , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Lateral Inhibition between Orientation Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1970, Nature.

[41]  Ewald Hering Outlines of a theory of the light sense , 1964 .

[42]  P. A. van der Helm,et al.  The force of symmetry revisited: symmetry-to-noise ratios regulate (a)symmetry effects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[43]  P. Tiňo,et al.  Learning predictive statistics from temporal sequences: Dynamics and strategies , 2017, Journal of vision.

[44]  J. Latgé,et al.  Correction: Corrigendum: Circulating human basophils lack the features of professional antigen presenting cells , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[45]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  An Electrophysiological Index of Perceptual Goodness , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  M. Bertamini,et al.  Conditions for view invariance in the neural response to visual symmetry. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[47]  Frederick A. A. Kingdom,et al.  Introduction and Aims , 2016 .

[48]  N. Prins Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction , 2009 .