The other question: can and should robots have rights?

This essay addresses the other side of the robot ethics debate, taking up and investigating the question “Can and should robots have rights?” The examination of this subject proceeds by way of three steps or movements. We begin by looking at and analyzing the form of the question itself. There is an important philosophical difference between the two modal verbs that organize the inquiry—can and should. This difference has considerable history behind it that influences what is asked about and how. Second, capitalizing on this verbal distinction, it is possible to identify four modalities concerning social robots and the question of rights. The second section will identify and critically assess these four modalities as they have been deployed and developed in the current literature. Finally, we will conclude by proposing another alternative, a way of thinking otherwise that effectively challenges the existing rules of the game and provides for other ways of theorizing moral standing that can scale to the unique challenges and opportunities that are confronted in the face of social robots.

[1]  R. Kurzweil,et al.  The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology , 2006 .

[2]  Michael Slote,et al.  How To Derive “Ought” from “Is” , 2009 .

[3]  R. Sparrow.  The Turing Triage Test , 2004, Ethics and Information Technology.

[4]  K. E. Løgstrup,et al.  The Ethical Demand , 1972 .

[5]  J. Bentham.  An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation , 1945, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[6]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Growing Moral Relations , 2012 .

[7]  Martin D. Ringle.  Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology , 1982 .

[8]  K. Marx.  Capital: A Critique of Political Economy , 1867 .

[9]  J. Storrs Hall,et al.  Ethics for Machines , 2002 .

[10]  I. Kant,et al.  Grounding for the metaphysics of morals , 1981 .

[11]  Michael Anderson,et al.  Machine Ethics , 2011 .

[12]  L. Floridi,et al.  The Ethics of Information , 2013, Dialogue.

[13]  Anne Gerdes,et al.  The issue of moral consideration in robot ethics , 2016, SIGCAS Comput. Soc..

[14]  Jun Hu,et al.  Exploring the abuse of robots , 2008 .

[15]  Max Velmans.  Understanding Consciousness: Second Edition , 2009 .

[16]  Matthew Calarco,et al.  Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida , 2008 .

[17]  J. Weizenbaum.  From Computer Power and Human Reason From Judgment to Calculation , 2007 .

[18]  B. Rosenberg,et al.  Democracy in America , 1961 .

[19]  J. B. Callicott.  In defense of the land ethic: essays in environmental philosophy , 1989 .

[20]  W. D. Hudson.  The is-ought question: A collection of papers on the central problems in moral philosophy, , 1969 .

[21]  S. Hinchliffe,et al.  Where Species Meet , 2007 .

[22]  Scott Lash,et al.  Postmodern Ethics , 1996 .

[23]  J. Weizenbaum.  Computer Power And Human Reason: From Judgement To Calculation , 1978 .

[24]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[25]  Zachary J. McDowell.  The machine question: Critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics , 2014, New Media Soc..

[26]  A. Feenberg.  The critical theory of technology , 1990 .

[27]  Thomas H. Birch,et al.  Moral Considerability and Universal Consideration , 1993 .

[28]  Karin Lindström,et al.  When Species Meet , 2016 .

[29]  K. Darling.  Extending Legal Protection to Social Robots: The Effects of Anthropomorphism, Empathy, and Violent Behavior Towards Robotic Objects , 2012 .

[30]  T. Abeles.  Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong , 2010 .

[31]  Michał Piekarski,et al.  The Problem of the Question About Animal Ethics: Discussion with Mark Coeckelbergh and David Gunkel , 2016 .

[32]  Julie Carpenter.  Culture and Human-Robot Interaction in Militarized Spaces: A War Story , 2016 .

[33]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[34]  Gerhard Schurz,et al.  The Is-Ought Problem: An Investigation in Philosophical Logic , 1997 .

[35]  B. Massumi,et al.  The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge , 1979 .

[36]  David Levy,et al.  The Ethical Treatment of Artificially Conscious Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[37]  Nick Bostrom,et al.  Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies , 2014 .

[38]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Response to “The Problem of the Question About Animal Ethics” by Michal Piekarski , 2016 .

[39]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Facing Animals: A Relational, Other-Oriented Approach to Moral Standing , 2014 .

[40]  Shannon Vallor.  Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting , 2016 .

[41]  William C. Latham.  Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the Twenty-First Century , 2009 .

[42]  Blay Whitby,et al.  Sometimes it's hard to be a robot: A call for action on the ethics of abusing artificial agents , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[43]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  An Experimental Study on Emotional Reactions Towards a Robot , 2012, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[44]  J. Bryson.  Robots should be slaves , 2010 .

[45]  Andrew Baerg.  Thinking Otherwise: Philosophy, Communication, Technology (review) , 2009 .

[46]  C. Pigden,et al.  The is-ought problem: An investigation in philosophical logic , 2001 .

[47]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  “Daisy, daisy, give me your answer do!” switching off a robot , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[48]  Martin H. Levinson.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other , 2011 .

[49]  Jeffrey T. Nealon.  Alterity Politics: Ethics and Performative Subjectivity , 1998 .

[50]  J. Derrida,et al.  The Animal That Therefore I Am , 2019, In the Tree Where the Double Sex Sleeps.

[51]  David Levy.  Robots Unlimited: Life in a Virtual Age , 2005 .

[52]  Joanna Bryson,et al.  Patiency Is Not a Virtue: AI and the Design of Ethical Systems , 2016, AAAI Spring Symposia.

[53]  M. Coeckelbergh,et al.  Growing Moral Relations: Critique of Moral Status Ascription , 2012 .

[54]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[55]  T. Penelhum.  A Treatise of Human Nature (review) , 2000 .

[56]  A. Lingis,et al.  Totality and infinity : an essay on exteriority , 1969 .

[57]  Michiteru Kitazaki,et al.  Measuring empathy for human and robot hand pain using electroencephalography , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[58]  Deborah G. Johnson.  Computer systems: Moral entities but not moral agents , 2006, Ethics and Information Technology.

[59]  Johanna Seibt,et al.  What Social Robots Can and Should Do - Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016 / TRANSOR 2016, Aarhus, Denmark, October 17-21, 2016 , 2016, Robophilosophy/TRANSOR.

[60]  Donald J. Pierce,et al.  Democracy in America , 2018, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[61]  M. Heidegger.  The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays , 1977 .

[62]  Güven Güzeldere.  The many faces of consciousness , 1997 .