Occupant kinematics and biomechanics during frontal collision in autonomous vehicles—can rotatable seat provides additional protection?

Abstract In a highly autonomous vehicle (HAV), the rotatable seat is likely to be designed to facilitate ease of communication between the occupants. We hypothesize that the protective effects of current restraint systems vary among different seating configurations and that by using the rotational seat to alter the occupant’s orientation in accordance with the direction of impact, occupants will be better protected. Moreover, in HAVs, it’s likely that an imminent impact could be detected at a time of 200 ms, or even longer, prior to the initial contact. The availability of this additional time could be used strategically to actively position the occupants into a safer position for impact. Finite element simulations were performed using the THUMS model to test the hypothesis. The simulation results indicated that during a frontal impact, the backward-facing occupant is safer than occupants in other seating orientations. Moreover, 200 ms is sufficient to rotate the occupant by ±45° and ±90° without introducing additional injuries. Finally, the timing of the post-rotation impact also plays a role in injury risk of the rear-facing impact. Further studies are needed to optimize the rotating seat parameters in order to maintain occupant posture and improve crash safety in HAVs.

[1]  Michael Sivak,et al.  Road safety with self-driving vehicles: general limitations and road sharing with conventional vehicles , 2015 .

[2]  D. Bose,et al.  Influence of pre-collision occupant parameters on injury outcome in a frontal collision. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  F S Gayzik,et al.  A preliminary study of human model head and neck response to frontal loading in nontraditional occupant seating configurations , 2018, Traffic injury prevention.

[4]  Katarina Bohman,et al.  Seating positions and activities in highly automated cars: a qualitative study of future automated driving scenarios , 2017 .

[5]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Yuichi Kitagawa,et al.  Occupant Kinematics in Simulated Autonomous Driving Vehicle Collisions: Influence of Seating Position, Direction and Angle. , 2017, Stapp car crash journal.

[7]  Tsuyoshi Yasuki,et al.  Correlation among Seatbelt Load, Chest Deflection, Rib Fracture and Internal Organ Strain in Frontal Collisions with Human Body Finite Element Models , 2013 .

[8]  Marco Pierini,et al.  Inevitable Collision States for Motorcycle-to-Car Collision Scenarios , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.