The case for reassessment of health care technology. Once is not enough.

Assessment of health care technologies should be an iterative process, not a single event. In the United States there are an increasing number of organized attempts at reassessment of technologies by the health industry, professional societies, and national government agencies, such as the Medical Necessity Project of Blue Cross/Blue Shield, the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians, and the work of the US Preventive Services Task Force. We examine four clinical practices--electronic fetal monitoring, episiotomy, electroencephalography, and hysterectomy--to illustrate the need to continuously reassess existing technologies and to challenge our current inertia in this critical arena of health practice.

[1]  Max Stafford-Clark,et al.  Taking stock , 2022, Trans. GIS.

[2]  D. Paintin Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth , 1990, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  S. Parente,et al.  Priority Setting in Medical Technology and Medical Practice Assessment , 1990, Medical care.

[4]  I. Silvergleit Health United States, 1988 , 1990 .

[5]  G. Belle,et al.  Effects of electronic fetal-heart-rate monitoring, as compared with periodic auscultation, on the neurologic development of premature infants. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  W. Spitzer The Scientific Admissibility of Evidence on the Effectiveness of Preventive Interventions , 1990 .

[7]  D M Eddy,et al.  Selecting Technologies for Assessment , 1989, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[8]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Substituting diagnostic services. New tests only partly replace older ones. , 1989, JAMA.

[9]  U. P. S. T. Force,et al.  Guide to clinical preventive services : an assessment of the effectiveness of 169 interventions : report of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 1989 .

[10]  J. Thorp,et al.  Episiotomy: can its routine use be defended? , 1989, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  J C Javitt,et al.  Cost effectiveness of current approaches to the control of retinopathy in type I diabetics. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[12]  R. Pokras,et al.  Hysterectomy in the United States, 1965-84. , 1988, American journal of public health.

[13]  Clifford Goodman,et al.  Medical technology assessment directory : a pilot reference to organizations, assessments, and information resources , 1988 .

[14]  S B Thacker,et al.  Public health surveillance in the United States. , 1988, Epidemiologic reviews.

[15]  A L Greer,et al.  The State of the Art Versus the State of the Science: The Diffusion of New Medical Technologies into Practice , 1988, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[16]  H. Banta Anticipating and Assessing Health Care Technology , 1988, Scenario Commission on Future Health Care Technology.

[17]  J. Wickham The new surgery. , 1987, British medical journal.

[18]  S. Thacker The efficacy of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring. , 1987, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  S. Thacker,et al.  Surveillance of Medical Technologies , 1986, Journal of public health policy.

[20]  M. Staquet,et al.  Randomized Trials in Cancer: A Critical Review by Sites , 1986 .

[21]  C. Travis Medical decision making and elective surgery: the case of hysterectomy. , 1985, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Elective Hysterectomy: Benefits, Risks, and Costs , 1985 .

[23]  R C Dicker,et al.  Confirmation of the preoperative diagnoses for hysterectomy. , 1984, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  I. Chalmers,et al.  West Berkshire perineal management trial. , 1984, British medical journal.

[25]  P. M. North,et al.  Is routine episiotomy necessary? , 1984 .

[26]  N. Roos,et al.  Hysterectomy: variations in rates across small areas and across physicians' practices. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[27]  H. David Banta,et al.  Embracing or Rejecting Innovations: Clinical Diffusion of Health Care Technology , 1984 .

[28]  J. D. Emerson,et al.  Reporting clinical trials in general surgical journals. , 1984, Surgery.

[29]  W. Foege Budgetary Medical Ethics , 1983 .

[30]  D. Grimes,et al.  Hysterectomy in the United States , 1983, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[31]  S. Thacker,et al.  Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. , 1983, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[32]  J. Wennberg Should the cost of insurance reflect the cost of use in local hospital markets? , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  H. Jordaan,et al.  Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. III. Association of meconium with abnormal fetal heart rate patterns. , 1980, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  Gevins As,et al.  A critical review of electroencephalographic (EEG) correlates of higher cortical functions. , 1980 .

[35]  J P Bunker,et al.  The need for assessing the outcome of common medical practices. , 1980, Annual review of public health.

[36]  H V Fineberg,et al.  Evaluation of medical practices. The case for technology assessment. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  Banta Hd,et al.  Assessing the costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring. , 1979 .

[38]  D. Andrulis,et al.  Assessing medical technologies. , 1978, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.

[39]  S. Schroeder,et al.  Impact of New Technology: The CT Scanner , 1977, Medical care.

[40]  A. Gittelsohn,et al.  Changes in tonsillectomy rates associated with feedback and review. , 1977, Pediatrics.

[41]  H H Hiatt,et al.  Protecting the medical commons: who is responsible? , 1975, Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards.

[42]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[43]  B. Rosner,et al.  Neurophysiologic Effects of General Anesthetics: I. The Electroencephalogram and Sensory Evoked Responses in Man , 1973, Anesthesiology.

[44]  K L White,et al.  Technology and health care. , 1972, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  A. L. Cochrane,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services , 1972 .