On the Supposed Evidence for Libertarian Paternalism

[1]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Thinking Fast and Slow , 2017, SIGMETRICS Perform. Evaluation Rev..

[2]  J. Schreiber Foundations Of Statistics , 2016 .

[3]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior , 2015 .

[4]  Chris Arney Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2015 .

[5]  Henrik Olsson,et al.  Measuring overconfidence: Methodological problems and statistical artifacts , 2014 .

[6]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Breast cancer screening pamphlets mislead women , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  G. Gigerenzer Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions , 2014 .

[8]  C. Sunstein Why Nudge?: The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism , 2014 .

[9]  C. Till,et al.  RISK LITERACY: FIRST STEPS IN PRIMARY SCHOOL , 2014 .

[10]  Anton Kühberger,et al.  Choice, Rating, and Ranking: Framing Effects with Different Response Modes , 2013 .

[11]  S. Arie Uruguay’s mandatory breast cancer screening for working women aged 40-59 is challenged , 2013, BMJ.

[12]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  The Storrs Lectures: Behavioral Economics and Paternalism , 2012 .

[13]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  How a charity oversells mammography , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  R. Rebonato Taking Liberties: A Critical Examination of Libertarian Paternalism , 2012 .

[15]  P. Todd,et al.  Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World , 2012 .

[16]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Do Physicians Understand Cancer Screening Statistics? A National Survey of Primary Care Physicians in the United States , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  J. Multmeier Representations facilitate Bayesian reasoning: Computational facilitation and ecological design revisited , 2012 .

[18]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Rethinking cognitive biases as environmental consequences , 2012 .

[19]  Mike Pearson,et al.  Visualizing Uncertainty About the Future , 2022 .

[20]  Korstanje Maximiliano,et al.  Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle , 2011 .

[21]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Better Doctors, Better Patients, Better Decisions: Envisioning Health Care 2020 , 2011 .

[22]  E. Akl,et al.  Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[23]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Are Based on Common Principles This Article Has Been Corrected. See Last Page , 2022 .

[24]  D. Cohen,et al.  WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies” , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  A. Hama Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions , 2010 .

[26]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  I. Chalmers Know Your Chances: Understanding Health Statistics , 2010 .

[28]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  As-If Behavioral Economics: Neoclassical Economics in Disguise? , 2010 .

[29]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[30]  R. Hertwig,et al.  The description–experience gap in risky choice , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  M. Bond Decision-making: Risk school , 2009, Nature.

[32]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Public Knowledge of Benefits of Breast and Prostate Cancer Screening in Europe , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[33]  Anton Kühberger,et al.  Risky Choice Framing: Task Versions and a Comparison of Prospect Theory and Fuzzy- Trace Theory , 2009 .

[34]  Victor DeMiguel,et al.  Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? , 2009 .

[35]  Gary L. Brase Pictorial representations in statistical reasoning , 2009 .

[36]  I. Daubechies,et al.  Sparse and stable Markowitz portfolios , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  R. Nisbett Intelligence and how to get it: Why schools and cultures count. , 2009 .

[38]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[39]  Steven Woloshin,et al.  Know Your Chances: Understanding Health Statistics , 2008 .

[40]  Charles Kemp,et al.  Bayesian models of cognition , 2008 .

[41]  N. Chater,et al.  The probabilistic mind: prospects for Bayesian cognitive science , 2008 .

[42]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics , 2022 .

[44]  Anders Winman,et al.  The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals. , 2007, Psychological review.

[45]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Psychology Implies Paternalism? Bounded Rationality may Reduce the Rationale to Regulate Risk-Taking , 2007, Soc. Choice Welf..

[46]  D. Henry,et al.  Describing treatment effects to patients , 2003, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[47]  Gary L. Brase The (In)flexibility of Evolved Frequency Representations for Statistical Reasoning: Cognitive Styles and Brief Prompts Do Not Influence Bayesian Inference , 2007 .

[48]  Ken Binmore,et al.  Rational Decisions in Large Worlds. , 2007 .

[49]  Craig R. M. McKenzie,et al.  Information leakage from logically equivalent frames , 2006, Cognition.

[50]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Special issue on “Probabilistic models of cognition , 2022 .

[51]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Stacey R. Finkelstein,et al.  Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults , 2006, Psychological science.

[53]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Children can solve Bayesian problems: the role of representation in mental computation , 2006, Cognition.

[54]  J. D. Trout Paternalism and Cognitive Bias , 2005 .

[55]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Judgments of risk frequencies: tests of possible cognitive mechanisms. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  David M Studdert,et al.  Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. , 2005, JAMA.

[57]  C. Sunstein Laws of Fear: Acknowledgments , 2005 .

[58]  H. Gilbert Welch,et al.  Should I Be Tested for Cancer?: Maybe Not and Here's Why , 2004 .

[59]  P. Salovey,et al.  Field Experiments in Social Psychology , 2004 .

[60]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The Construction of Preference: Do Defaults Save Lives? , 2006 .

[61]  Jonathan D. Nelson,et al.  What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[62]  P. Gøtzsche,et al.  Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[63]  R. Thaler,et al.  Libertarian Paternalism , 2019, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics.

[64]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Communicating statistical DNA evidence , 2003 .

[65]  O. Curry Bounded Rationality : The Adaptive Toolbox , 2003 .

[66]  A. Miller Screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.

[67]  C. McHorney,et al.  Frequency or Probability? A Qualitative Study of Risk Communication Formats Used in Health Care , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[68]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[69]  David R. Mandel,et al.  Gain-Loss Framing and Choice: Separating Outcome Formulations from Descriptor Formulations. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[70]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Communicating Statistical Information , 2000, Science.

[71]  P. Juslin,et al.  Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: a critical examination of the hard-easy effect. , 2000, Psychological review.

[72]  R. Selten,et al.  Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox , 2000 .

[73]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World , 2000 .

[74]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  Gentle Nudges vs. Hard Shoves: Solving the Sticky Norms Problem , 2000 .

[75]  I. Noveck,et al.  Not only base rates are neglected in the Engineer-Lawyer problem: An investigation of reasoners’ underutilization of complementarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[76]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The "conjunction fallacy" revisited : How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors , 1999 .

[77]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[78]  C. Stevens-Simon,et al.  The effect of monetary incentives and peer support groups on repeat adolescent pregnancies. A randomized trial of the Dollar-a-Day Program. , 1997, JAMA.

[79]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Role of Process in the Rational Analysis of Memory , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[80]  C. Stevens-Simon,et al.  The Effect of Monetary Incentives and Peer Support Groups on Repeat Adolescent Pregnancies A Randomized Trial of the Dollar-a-Day Program , 1997 .

[81]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  The False Consensus Effect and Overconfidence: Flaws in Judgment or Flaws in How We Study Judgment? , 1996 .

[82]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty , 1996, Cognition.

[83]  John Tooby,et al.  Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all , 1996 .

[84]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats , 1995 .

[85]  Anton Kühberger,et al.  The Framing of Decisions: A New Look at Old Problems , 1995 .

[86]  I. Erev,et al.  Simultaneous Over- and Underconfidence: The Role of Error in Judgment Processes. , 1994 .

[87]  Gernot D. Kleiter,et al.  Natural Sampling: Rationality without Base Rates , 1994 .

[88]  Pamela Ramser,et al.  Quasi-rational Economics , 1993 .

[89]  Amartya Sen,et al.  INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF CHOICE , 1993 .

[90]  John R. Anderson The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[91]  A. D. Pearman,et al.  Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader , 1999 .

[92]  K. Fiedler The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors , 1988 .

[93]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable. , 1988 .

[94]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[95]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[96]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[97]  D. Krantz,et al.  The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[98]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[99]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Heuristics in Negotiation: Limitations to Effective Dispute Resolution , 1983 .

[100]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Conservatism in human information processing , 1982 .

[101]  A. Tversky,et al.  Causal Schemata in Judgments under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[102]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk , 1982 .

[103]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[104]  M. Fishbein Progress in social psychology , 1980 .

[105]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[106]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[107]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[108]  F. Marley Helping the Doctors , 1969 .

[109]  R. Cattell,et al.  Formal representation of human judgment , 1968 .

[110]  J. Piaget,et al.  The early growth of logic in the child : classification and seriation , 1965 .

[111]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .