On the Supposed Evidence for Libertarian Paternalism
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Adam Wierman,et al. Thinking Fast and Slow , 2017, SIGMETRICS Perform. Evaluation Rev..
[2] J. Schreiber. Foundations Of Statistics , 2016 .
[3] R. Hertwig,et al. Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior , 2015 .
[4] Chris Arney. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2015 .
[5] Henrik Olsson,et al. Measuring overconfidence: Methodological problems and statistical artifacts , 2014 .
[6] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Breast cancer screening pamphlets mislead women , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[7] G. Gigerenzer. Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions , 2014 .
[8] C. Sunstein. Why Nudge?: The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism , 2014 .
[9] C. Till,et al. RISK LITERACY: FIRST STEPS IN PRIMARY SCHOOL , 2014 .
[10] Anton Kühberger,et al. Choice, Rating, and Ranking: Framing Effects with Different Response Modes , 2013 .
[11] S. Arie. Uruguay’s mandatory breast cancer screening for working women aged 40-59 is challenged , 2013, BMJ.
[12] Cass R. Sunstein,et al. The Storrs Lectures: Behavioral Economics and Paternalism , 2012 .
[13] Lisa M. Schwartz,et al. How a charity oversells mammography , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[14] R. Rebonato. Taking Liberties: A Critical Examination of Libertarian Paternalism , 2012 .
[15] P. Todd,et al. Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World , 2012 .
[16] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Do Physicians Understand Cancer Screening Statistics? A National Survey of Primary Care Physicians in the United States , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[17] J. Multmeier. Representations facilitate Bayesian reasoning: Computational facilitation and ecological design revisited , 2012 .
[18] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Rethinking cognitive biases as environmental consequences , 2012 .
[19] Mike Pearson,et al. Visualizing Uncertainty About the Future , 2022 .
[20] Korstanje Maximiliano,et al. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle , 2011 .
[21] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Better Doctors, Better Patients, Better Decisions: Envisioning Health Care 2020 , 2011 .
[22] E. Akl,et al. Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[23] G. Gigerenzer,et al. Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Are Based on Common Principles This Article Has Been Corrected. See Last Page , 2022 .
[24] D. Cohen,et al. WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies” , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[25] A. Hama. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions , 2010 .
[26] Karl J. Friston. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[27] I. Chalmers. Know Your Chances: Understanding Health Statistics , 2010 .
[28] G. Gigerenzer,et al. As-If Behavioral Economics: Neoclassical Economics in Disguise? , 2010 .
[29] Rebecca S Lewis,et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.
[30] R. Hertwig,et al. The description–experience gap in risky choice , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[31] M. Bond. Decision-making: Risk school , 2009, Nature.
[32] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Public Knowledge of Benefits of Breast and Prostate Cancer Screening in Europe , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[33] Anton Kühberger,et al. Risky Choice Framing: Task Versions and a Comparison of Prospect Theory and Fuzzy- Trace Theory , 2009 .
[34] Victor DeMiguel,et al. Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? , 2009 .
[35] Gary L. Brase. Pictorial representations in statistical reasoning , 2009 .
[36] I. Daubechies,et al. Sparse and stable Markowitz portfolios , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[37] R. Nisbett. Intelligence and how to get it: Why schools and cultures count. , 2009 .
[38] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[39] Steven Woloshin,et al. Know Your Chances: Understanding Health Statistics , 2008 .
[40] Charles Kemp,et al. Bayesian models of cognition , 2008 .
[41] N. Chater,et al. The probabilistic mind: prospects for Bayesian cognitive science , 2008 .
[42] D. Brenner,et al. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[43] Lisa M. Schwartz,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics , 2022 .
[44] Anders Winman,et al. The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals. , 2007, Psychological review.
[45] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Psychology Implies Paternalism? Bounded Rationality may Reduce the Rationale to Regulate Risk-Taking , 2007, Soc. Choice Welf..
[46] D. Henry,et al. Describing treatment effects to patients , 2003, Journal of General Internal Medicine.
[47] Gary L. Brase. The (In)flexibility of Evolved Frequency Representations for Statistical Reasoning: Cognitive Styles and Brief Prompts Do Not Influence Bayesian Inference , 2007 .
[48] Ken Binmore,et al. Rational Decisions in Large Worlds. , 2007 .
[49] Craig R. M. McKenzie,et al. Information leakage from logically equivalent frames , 2006, Cognition.
[50] J. Tenenbaum,et al. Special issue on “Probabilistic models of cognition , 2022 .
[51] Christopher D. Manning,et al. Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[52] Stacey R. Finkelstein,et al. Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults , 2006, Psychological science.
[53] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Children can solve Bayesian problems: the role of representation in mental computation , 2006, Cognition.
[54] J. D. Trout. Paternalism and Cognitive Bias , 2005 .
[55] R. Hertwig,et al. Judgments of risk frequencies: tests of possible cognitive mechanisms. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[56] David M Studdert,et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. , 2005, JAMA.
[57] C. Sunstein. Laws of Fear: Acknowledgments , 2005 .
[58] H. Gilbert Welch,et al. Should I Be Tested for Cancer?: Maybe Not and Here's Why , 2004 .
[59] P. Salovey,et al. Field Experiments in Social Psychology , 2004 .
[60] Eric J. Johnson,et al. The Construction of Preference: Do Defaults Save Lives? , 2006 .
[61] Jonathan D. Nelson,et al. What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[62] P. Gøtzsche,et al. Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[63] R. Thaler,et al. Libertarian Paternalism , 2019, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics.
[64] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Communicating statistical DNA evidence , 2003 .
[65] O. Curry. Bounded Rationality : The Adaptive Toolbox , 2003 .
[66] A. Miller. Screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.
[67] C. McHorney,et al. Frequency or Probability? A Qualitative Study of Risk Communication Formats Used in Health Care , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[68] G. Gigerenzer,et al. Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[69] David R. Mandel,et al. Gain-Loss Framing and Choice: Separating Outcome Formulations from Descriptor Formulations. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[70] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Communicating Statistical Information , 2000, Science.
[71] P. Juslin,et al. Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: a critical examination of the hard-easy effect. , 2000, Psychological review.
[72] R. Selten,et al. Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox , 2000 .
[73] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World , 2000 .
[74] Dan M. Kahan,et al. Gentle Nudges vs. Hard Shoves: Solving the Sticky Norms Problem , 2000 .
[75] I. Noveck,et al. Not only base rates are neglected in the Engineer-Lawyer problem: An investigation of reasoners’ underutilization of complementarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.
[76] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. The "conjunction fallacy" revisited : How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors , 1999 .
[77] P. Todd,et al. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .
[78] C. Stevens-Simon,et al. The effect of monetary incentives and peer support groups on repeat adolescent pregnancies. A randomized trial of the Dollar-a-Day Program. , 1997, JAMA.
[79] John R. Anderson,et al. The Role of Process in the Rational Analysis of Memory , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.
[80] C. Stevens-Simon,et al. The Effect of Monetary Incentives and Peer Support Groups on Repeat Adolescent Pregnancies A Randomized Trial of the Dollar-a-Day Program , 1997 .
[81] Robyn M. Dawes,et al. The False Consensus Effect and Overconfidence: Flaws in Judgment or Flaws in How We Study Judgment? , 1996 .
[82] L. Cosmides,et al. Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty , 1996, Cognition.
[83] John Tooby,et al. Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all , 1996 .
[84] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats , 1995 .
[85] Anton Kühberger,et al. The Framing of Decisions: A New Look at Old Problems , 1995 .
[86] I. Erev,et al. Simultaneous Over- and Underconfidence: The Role of Error in Judgment Processes. , 1994 .
[87] Gernot D. Kleiter,et al. Natural Sampling: Rationality without Base Rates , 1994 .
[88] Pamela Ramser,et al. Quasi-rational Economics , 1993 .
[89] Amartya Sen,et al. INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF CHOICE , 1993 .
[90] John R. Anderson. The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .
[91] A. D. Pearman,et al. Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader , 1999 .
[92] K. Fiedler. The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors , 1988 .
[93] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable. , 1988 .
[94] Colin Potts,et al. Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .
[95] S. Chaiken,et al. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[96] A. Tversky,et al. Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .
[97] D. Krantz,et al. The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.
[98] Herbert A. Simon,et al. Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science , 1985, American Political Science Review.
[99] Max H. Bazerman,et al. Heuristics in Negotiation: Limitations to Effective Dispute Resolution , 1983 .
[100] Ward Edwards,et al. Judgment under uncertainty: Conservatism in human information processing , 1982 .
[101] A. Tversky,et al. Causal Schemata in Judgments under Uncertainty , 1982 .
[102] Baruch Fischhoff,et al. Judgment under uncertainty: Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk , 1982 .
[103] A. Tversky,et al. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.
[104] M. Fishbein. Progress in social psychology , 1980 .
[105] A. Tversky,et al. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.
[106] A. Tversky,et al. On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .
[107] A. Tversky,et al. Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .
[108] F. Marley. Helping the Doctors , 1969 .
[109] R. Cattell,et al. Formal representation of human judgment , 1968 .
[110] J. Piaget,et al. The early growth of logic in the child : classification and seriation , 1965 .
[111] F. Knight. The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .