Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective

The present paper analyses how top managers construct the meaning of sustainable human resource management (HRM) and its responsibility areas and how they identify and prioritize stakeholders in sustainable HRM. The empirical data were collected as part of the Finnish HR Barometer inquiry. A qualitative analysis reveals four dimensions of sustainable HRM: Justice and equality, transparent HR practices, profitability, and employee well-being. It also reveals four broader responsibility areas: Legal and ethical, managerial, social, and economic. Contrary to the prior green HRM literature, ecological responsibility was largely ignored. The study also reveals a wide range of stakeholders, specifically, owners, managers, employees, customers, and employee representatives, as well as their special roles and requirements for sustainable HRM. These findings contribute to the literature of sustainable HRM by illustrating the dimensions and broader responsibilities of sustainable HRM as seen by top managers. Their conceptions of sustainable HRM are largely neglected in the prior literature despite their crucial role in legitimating HRM and thus sustainable HRM in companies. These results also contribute to the theory of stakeholder salience (identification and prioritization of stakeholders) in the sustainable HRM context from the viewpoint of top managers.

[1]  C. Jabbour,et al.  State-of-the-Art and Future Directions for Green Human Resource Management: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2011 .

[2]  Jean‐Pascal Gond,et al.  The human resources contribution to responsible leadership : An exploration of the CSR-HR interface , 2011 .

[3]  Krista Gullo,et al.  The Engaged Organization: Corporate Employee Environmental Education Survey and Case Study Findings. , 2009 .

[4]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[5]  K. Zink,et al.  Sustainability and HRM , 2014 .

[6]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  Managing Human Resources Through Strategic Partnerships , 2002 .

[7]  Rami Shani,et al.  Creating sustainable work systems: Developing social sustainability , 2002 .

[8]  H. V. Buren,et al.  Bringing stakeholder theory to industrial relations , 2011 .

[9]  S. Corlett,et al.  Exploring Employee Engagement with (Corporate) Social Responsibility: A Social Exchange Perspective on Organisational Participation , 2015 .

[10]  Ina Ehnert,et al.  Paradox as a lens for theorizing Sustainable HRM: Mapping and coping with paradoxes and tensions , 2013 .

[11]  D. Guest Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda , 1997 .

[12]  Marilyn Clarke Sustainable HRM: A New Approach to People Management , 2011 .

[13]  S. Maguire,et al.  Green Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda , 2013 .

[14]  Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour,et al.  The central role of human resource management in the search for sustainable organizations , 2008 .

[15]  Frank Figge,et al.  Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework , 2014 .

[16]  Mary Anne Devanna,et al.  Strategic Human Resource Management , 1984 .

[17]  Ina Ehnert,et al.  Sustainable Human Resource Management: A conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective , 2009 .

[18]  F. Cooke,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and HRM in China: a study of textile and apparel enterprises , 2010 .

[19]  John Roberts,et al.  No-one is perfect: the limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability , 2009 .

[20]  R. Freeman,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability in Scandinavia: An Overview , 2014, Journal of Business Ethics.

[21]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Applying Stakeholder Theory in Sustainability Management , 2014 .

[22]  J. Pfeffer Seven Practices of Successful Organizations , 1998, California Management Review.

[23]  E. Cohen CSR for HR: A Necessary Partnership for Advancing Responsible Business Practices , 2010 .

[24]  David Ulrich,et al.  The HR Value Proposition , 2005 .

[25]  S. Jackson,et al.  The greening of strategic HRM scholarship , 2010 .

[26]  M. Greenwood,et al.  Trust and Stakeholder Theory: Trustworthiness in the Organisation–Stakeholder Relationship , 2010 .

[27]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[28]  D. Bowen,et al.  Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System , 2004 .

[29]  D. Siegel,et al.  Defining the socially responsible leader , 2008 .

[30]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[31]  R. Gray,et al.  Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies , 1995 .

[32]  R. Edward Freeman,et al.  Stakeholder Theory and "The Corporate Objective Revisited" , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Michelle Greenwood,et al.  Ethics and HRM: A Review and Conceptual Analysis , 2002 .

[34]  F. Morgeson,et al.  Extending Corporate Social Responsibility Research to the Human Resource Management and Organizational Behavior Domains: A Look to the Future , 2013 .

[35]  A. Carroll The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[36]  J. Segers,et al.  Sustainable HRM: Bridging theory and practice through the ‘Respect Openness Continuity (ROC)’-model , 2014 .

[37]  Robin Kramar,et al.  Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach? , 2014 .

[38]  A. Shani,et al.  Stakeholder Involvement in Human Resource Management Practices: Evidence from Italy , 2014 .

[39]  Ina Ehnert,et al.  Sustainability and human resource management: reasoning and applications on corporate websites , 2009 .

[40]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[41]  P. Wright,et al.  Variability Within Organizations: Implications for Strategic Human Resource Management , 2007 .

[42]  Teun A. van Dijk,et al.  “There was a Problem, and it was Solved!”: Legitimating the Expulsion of `Illegal' Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse , 1997 .

[43]  D. Ulrich Human Resource Champions , 1996 .

[44]  Zinta S. Byrne,et al.  The future of HR is RH: Respect for humanity at work , 2015 .

[45]  Peter Docherty,et al.  Emerging work systems: from intensive to sustainable , 2002 .

[46]  T. Luu Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Tourism , 2011 .

[47]  I. Ehnert,et al.  Recent Developments and Future Prospects on Sustainable Human Resource Management: Introduction to the Special Issue ** , 2012 .

[48]  M. Veldhoven,et al.  HRM well-being and performance: A theoretical and empirical review , 2013 .

[49]  P. Wright,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management , 1992 .

[50]  Sugumar Mariappanadar Sustainable human resource strategy: The sustainable and unsustainable dilemmas of retrenchment , 2003 .

[51]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[52]  M. Morsing,et al.  CSR as aspirational talk , 2013 .

[53]  Mick Marchington,et al.  Human resource management (HRM): Too busy looking up to see where it is going longer term? , 2015 .

[54]  J. Osland,et al.  Aracruz Celulose: best practices icon but still at risk , 2007 .

[55]  M. Greenwood Ethical Analyses of HRM: A Review and Research Agenda , 2013 .

[56]  Torben M. Andersen,et al.  The Scandinavian model—prospects and challenges , 2007 .

[57]  J. M. Ryner,et al.  The Nordic Model: Does It Exist? Can It Survive? , 2007 .

[58]  M. Wagner,et al.  Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies , 2016 .

[59]  L. Solari,et al.  A Stakeholder Perspective for Sustainable HRM , 2014 .

[60]  Stephen Fineman,et al.  GREEN STAKEHOLDERS: INDUSTRY INTERPRETATIONS AND RESPONSE* , 1996 .

[61]  Paul R. Lawrence,et al.  Human Resource Management: A General Manager's Perspective , 1985 .

[62]  M. Greenwood Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility , 2007 .

[63]  R. Freeman,et al.  Ethics and HRM: The Contribution of Stakeholder Theory , 2011 .

[64]  R. Wells HRM for sustainability: creating a new paradigm , 2011 .

[65]  M. Beer,et al.  Back to the Future: Implications for the Field of HRM of the Multistakeholder Perspective Proposed 30 Years Ago , 2015 .

[66]  Empowering Employee Sustainability: Perceived Organizational Support Toward the Environment , 2015 .

[67]  Marco Guerci,et al.  The consensus between Italian HR and sustainability managers on HR management for sustainability-driven change – towards a ‘strong' HR management system , 2014 .

[68]  S. McKenna,et al.  Ethics and HRM: Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis , 2012 .

[69]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[70]  L. Shore,et al.  Examining degree of balance and level of obligation in the employment relationship: a social exchange approach , 1998 .

[71]  R. Gray,et al.  Accounting and accountability : changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting , 2003 .

[72]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Identity, Image, and Issue Interpretation: Sensemaking during Strategic Change in Academia. , 1996 .

[73]  Rüdiger Hahn,et al.  Determinants of Sustainability Reporting: A Review of Results, Trends, Theory, and Opportunities in an Expanding Field of Research , 2013 .

[74]  Helen Francis The power of “talk” in HRM‐based change , 2002 .

[75]  H. V. Buren,et al.  Strategic human resource management and the decline of employee focus , 2011 .

[76]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  Human resource management and organizational effectiveness: yesterday and today , 2014 .

[77]  Christian Voegtlin,et al.  Responsible Leadership in Global Business: A New Approach to Leadership and Its Multi-Level Outcomes , 2012 .

[78]  S. Vanhala,et al.  Performance in local government HRM: the role of external customers , 2013 .

[79]  Dirk Matten,et al.  Business Ethics: A European Perspective: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization , 2004 .

[80]  V. Buren,et al.  An Employee-Centered Model of Corporate Social Performance , 2005 .

[81]  L. Preston,et al.  Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View , 2002 .

[82]  D. Jamali,et al.  Exploring Human Resource Management Roles in Corporate Social Responsibility: The CSR‐HRM Co‐Creation Model , 2015 .

[83]  Marco Guerci,et al.  Moving toward stakeholder-based HRM: a perspective of Italian HR managers , 2013 .

[84]  Ina Ehnert,et al.  Sustainable Human Resource Management: A conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective , 2009 .

[85]  Tom Redman,et al.  Contemporary developments in Green (environmental) HRM scholarship , 2016 .

[86]  Jaap Paauwe,et al.  Employee Well‐Being and the HRM - Organizational Performance Relationship: A Review of Quantitative Studies , 2012 .

[87]  James Guthrie,et al.  The impact of diversity and equality management on firm performance: Beyond high performance work systems , 2010 .

[88]  D. Jamali A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective into Theory and Practice , 2008 .

[89]  Michel Ferrary A Stakeholder’s Perspective on Human Resource Management , 2009 .

[90]  K. Macky,et al.  Research and theory on high-performance work systems: progressing the high-involvement stream , 2009 .

[91]  Sugumar Mariappanadar The harm indicators of negative externality of efficiency focused organizational practices , 2012 .

[92]  Charles Koeber,et al.  Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay off , 1999 .

[93]  Milena M. Parent,et al.  A Case Study of Stakeholder Identification and Prioritization by Managers , 2007 .

[94]  Brian L. Delahaye,et al.  Enhancing workplace learning through collaborative HRD , 2011 .