Peptide backbone sampling convergence with the adaptive biasing force algorithm.

Complete Boltzmann sampling of reaction coordinates in biomolecular systems continues to be a challenge for unbiased molecular dynamics simulations. A growing number of methods have been developed for applying biases to biomolecular systems to enhance sampling while enabling recovery of the unbiased (Boltzmann) distribution of states. The adaptive biasing force (ABF) algorithm is one such method and works by canceling out the average force along the desired reaction coordinate(s) using an estimate of this force progressively accumulated during the simulation. Upon completion of the simulation, the potential of mean force, and therefore Boltzmann distribution of states, is obtained by integrating this average force. In an effort to characterize the expected performance in applications such as protein loop sampling, ABF was applied to the full ranges of the Ramachandran φ/ψ backbone dihedral reaction coordinates for dipeptides of the 20 amino acids using all-atom explicit-water molecular dynamics simulations. Approximately half of the dipeptides exhibited robust and rapid convergence of the potential of mean force as a function of φ/ψ in triplicate 50 ns simulations, while the remainder exhibited varying degrees of less complete convergence. The greatest difficulties in achieving converged ABF sampling were seen in the branched-side chain amino acids threonine and valine, as well as the special case of proline. Proline dipeptide sampling was further complicated by trans-to-cis peptide bond isomerization not observed in unbiased control molecular dynamics simulations. Overall, the ABF method was found to be a robust means of sampling the entire φ/ψ reaction coordinate for the 20 amino acids, including high free-energy regions typically inaccessible in standard molecular dynamics simulations.

[1]  Eric F Darve,et al.  Calculating free energies using average force , 2001 .

[2]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  Cis-Trans Imide Isomerization of the Proline Dipeptide , 1994 .

[3]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[4]  W. Briels,et al.  THE CALCULATION OF FREE-ENERGY DIFFERENCES BY CONSTRAINED MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS , 1998 .

[5]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  Basic ingredients of free energy calculations: A review , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[6]  M. Karplus,et al.  Stochastic boundary conditions for molecular dynamics simulations of ST2 water , 1984 .

[7]  M. Hestenes,et al.  Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems , 1952 .

[8]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  B. Brooks,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method , 1995 .

[10]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.

[11]  Eric Darve,et al.  Calculating Free Energies Using a Scaled-Force Molecular Dynamics Algorithm , 2002 .

[12]  I. Campbell,et al.  Structures of the Cd44–hyaluronan complex provide insight into a fundamental carbohydrate-protein interaction , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[13]  Bernard R. Brooks,et al.  Solvent-Induced Forces between Two Hydrophilic Groups , 1994 .

[14]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Constrained reaction coordinate dynamics for the simulation of rare events , 1989 .

[15]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[16]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Tyr66 acts as a conformational switch in the closed-to-open transition of the SHP-2 N-SH2-domain phosphotyrosine-peptide binding cleft , 2007, BMC Structural Biology.

[17]  Eric Darve,et al.  Assessing the efficiency of free energy calculation methods. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[18]  P. Krüger,et al.  Targeted molecular dynamics: a new approach for searching pathways of conformational transitions. , 1994, Journal of molecular graphics.

[19]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[20]  Eric Darve,et al.  Adaptive biasing force method for scalar and vector free energy calculations. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  Divesh Bhatt,et al.  Beyond microscopic reversibility: Are observable non-equilibrium processes precisely reversible? , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[22]  W. D. Otter,et al.  Thermodynamic integration of the free energy along a reaction coordinate in Cartesian coordinates , 2000 .

[23]  K. Schulten,et al.  Steered molecular dynamics and mechanical functions of proteins. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[24]  P. Kollman,et al.  Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models , 1992 .

[25]  G. Torrie,et al.  Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling , 1977 .

[26]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[27]  D. Chandler,et al.  Introduction To Modern Statistical Mechanics , 1987 .

[28]  Christophe Chipot,et al.  Exploring the free-energy landscape of a short peptide using an average force. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[29]  Christophe Chipot,et al.  Exploring Multidimensional Free Energy Landscapes Using Time-Dependent Biases on Collective Variables. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[30]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[31]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  CHARMM: The Energy Function and Its Parameterization , 2002 .

[33]  C. M. Reeves,et al.  Function minimization by conjugate gradients , 1964, Comput. J..

[34]  A. Laio,et al.  Escaping free-energy minima , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[36]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Targeting biomolecular flexibility with metadynamics. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[37]  Ronald D. Hills,et al.  Mechanism of binding site conformational switching in the CD44-hyaluronan protein-carbohydrate binding interaction. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  C. Chipot,et al.  Overcoming free energy barriers using unconstrained molecular dynamics simulations. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[39]  M. Toda,et al.  In: Statistical physics II , 1985 .

[40]  J. Banavar,et al.  Computer Simulation of Liquids , 1988 .

[41]  G. N. Ramachandran,et al.  Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. , 1963, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[43]  Bernard R. Brooks,et al.  New spherical‐cutoff methods for long‐range forces in macromolecular simulation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..