Stochastic Community Assembly Causes Higher Biodiversity in More Productive Environments

Biodiversity and Productivity When data are analyzed at relatively large spatial scales, biodiversity generally increases with productivity, but the pattern at smaller scales is more variable. Chase (p. 1388, published online 27 May) presents results from a 7-year experiment in artificial ponds. β-diversity (the variation in species composition from site to site) in animal species was persistently higher at higher productivity among otherwise homogeneous environments in this controlled experimental venue. This pattern appeared to result from shifts in the relative importance of deterministic versus stochastic community assembly mechanisms along the productivity gradient. Thus, variation in the mechanism of community assembly might be an important process determining the relationship between biodiversity and productivity. A long-term experiment in ponds addresses the influence of primary productivity on broad-scale patterns of biodiversity. Net primary productivity is a principal driver of biodiversity; large-scale regions with higher productivity generally have more species. This pattern emerges because β-diversity (compositional variation across local sites) increases with productivity, but the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are unknown. Using data from a long-term experiment in replicate ponds, I show that higher β-diversity at higher productivity resulted from a stronger role for stochastic relative to deterministic assembly processes with increasing productivity. This shift in the relative importance of stochasticity was most consistent with the hypothesis of more intense priority effects leading to multiple stable equilibria at higher productivity. Thus, shifts in community assembly mechanisms across a productivity gradient may underlie one of the most prominent biodiversity gradients on the planet.

[1]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity , 2009, Nature.

[2]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Critical Transitions in Nature and Society , 2009 .

[3]  Jianting Zhang,et al.  Testing the correlation between beta diversity and differences in productivity among global ecoregions, biomes, and biogeographical realms , 2009, Ecol. Informatics.

[4]  Richard Field,et al.  Spatial species‐richness gradients across scales: a meta‐analysis , 2009 .

[5]  S. Cox,et al.  Scale-dependent responses of plant biodiversity to nitrogen enrichment. , 2008, Ecology.

[6]  Andrew Gonzalez,et al.  Scale Dependence of Species‐Energy Relationships: Evidence from Fishes in Thousands of Lakes , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[7]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Spatial scale, abundance and the species-energy relationship in British birds. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[8]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Patterns of relative species abundance in rainforests and coral reefs , 2007, Nature.

[9]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Positive linear relationship between productivity and diversity: evidence from the Eurasian Steppe , 2007 .

[10]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties , 2006 .

[11]  H. H. Bruun,et al.  Community assembly in experimental grasslands: suitable environment or timely arrival? , 2006, Ecology.

[12]  T. Hughes,et al.  Coral reef diversity refutes the neutral theory of biodiversity , 2006, Nature.

[13]  Joshua H. Viers,et al.  Beta diversity and the scale‐dependence of the productivity‐diversity relationship: a test in the Californian serpentine flora , 2006 .

[14]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Neutral Ecological Theory Reveals Isolation and Rapid Speciation in a Biodiversity Hot Spot , 2005, Science.

[15]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Field parameterization and experimental test of the neutral theory of biodiversity , 2005, Nature.

[16]  David Storch,et al.  Structure of the species–energy relationship , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Tadashi Fukami,et al.  Community assembly along a species pool gradient: implications for multiple-scale patterns of species diversity , 2004, Population Ecology.

[18]  Benjamin Gilbert,et al.  Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Mathew A. Leibold,et al.  CYCLIC ASSEMBLY TRAJECTORIES AND SCALE‐DEPENDENT PRODUCTIVITY–DIVERSITY RELATIONSHIPS , 2004 .

[20]  Cynthia S. Brown,et al.  Community assembly and invasion: An experimental test of neutral versus niche processes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches , 2003 .

[22]  Jonathan M. Chase Community assembly: when should history matter? , 2003, Oecologia.

[23]  James S. Clark,et al.  Stability of forest biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[24]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Strong and weak trophic cascades along a productivity gradient , 2003 .

[25]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Dispersal, Environment, and Floristic Variation of Western Amazonian Forests , 2003, Science.

[26]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship , 2002, Nature.

[27]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Beta-Diversity in Tropical Forest Trees , 2002, Science.

[28]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2001 .

[29]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  J. Ashby References and Notes , 1999 .

[31]  Michael L. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1997 .

[32]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.