Evaluation of Single Subject Data Using Statistical Hypothesis Tests versus Visual Inspection of Charts With and Without Celeration Lines

The accuracy of visual analysis of single subject charts with and wilhout celeration lines was compared. A Monte Carlo simulation was used to create five types of AB design charts: (I) a flat (zero slope) baseline with no systematic change in intervention phase, (II) a flat baseline followed by a one standard deviation increase in level in intervention phase, (III) an ascending baseline with intervention phase responses following the baseline phase trend (no systematic change), (IV) an ascending set of baseline and intervention responses with a one standard deviation decrease in level in the intervention phase, and (V) an ascending baseline followed by descending intervention phase responses. These charts were evaluated by 271 members of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy. Charts with celeration lines were evaluated by 140 subjects and charts without celeration lines were evaluated by 131 subjects. Greater decision accuracy was associated with presence of celeration lines for situations w...

[1]  M Wolery,et al.  Interpreting results of single-subject research designs. , 1982, Physical therapy.

[2]  K. Ottenbacher,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Interrater Agreement for Single-Subject Data Using Graphs with and without Trend Lines , 1991 .

[3]  B. Sheldon.  The Use of Single Case Experimental Designs in the Evaluation of Social Work , 1983 .

[4]  S. Briar.  The Age of Accountability , 1973 .

[5]  Ray J. Thomlison.  Something Works: Evidence from Practice Effectiveness Studies , 1984 .

[6]  W. J. Reid,et al.  Recent evaluations of social work: grounds for optimism , 1982 .

[7]  Ann Casey,et al.  A Methodology for the Quantitative Synthesis of Intra-Subject Design Research , 1985 .

[8]  Bradley E. Huitema,et al.  Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: A myth. , 1985 .

[9]  Single-system design use of behavior therapists: Implications for social work , 1991 .

[10]  Kenneth J. Ottenbacher,et al.  Characteristics Influencing the Visual Analysis of Single-Subject Data: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[11]  B. Wampold,et al.  Intervention effects and relative variation as dimensions in experts' use of visual inference. , 1982, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[12]  D. Bailey,et al.  Effects of lines of progress and semilogarithmic charts on ratings of charted data. , 1984, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  K. Corcoran.  Clinical practice with nonbehavioral methods: Strategies for evaluation , 1985 .

[14]  T. Matyas,et al.  Visual analysis of single-case time series: Effects of variability, serial dependence, and magnitude of intervention effects. , 1990, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[15]  A. Rubin.  Practice Effectiveness: More Grounds for Optimism , 1985 .

[16]  K. Ottenbacher,et al.  Empirical investigation of visual-inspection versus trend-line analysis of single-subject data. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[17]  J. Gentile,et al.  An analysis-of-variance model for the intrasubject replication design. , 1972, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[18]  Thomas A. Matyas,et al.  Problems in the estimation of autocorrelation in brief time series and some implications for behavioral data , 1991 .