A data-driven approach to optimized medication dosing: a focus on heparin

PurposeTo demonstrate a novel method that utilizes retrospective data to develop statistically optimal dosing strategies for medications with sensitive therapeutic windows. We illustrate our approach on intravenous unfractionated heparin, a medication which typically considers only patient weight and is frequently misdosed.MethodsWe identified available clinical features which impact patient response to heparin and extracted 1,511 patients from the multi-parameter intelligent monitoring in intensive care II database which met our inclusion criteria. These were used to develop two multivariate logistic regressions, modeling sub- and supra-therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) as a function of clinical features. We combined information from these models to estimate an initial heparin dose that would, on a per-patient basis, maximize the probability of a therapeutic aPTT within 4–8 h of the initial infusion. We tested our model’s ability to classifying therapeutic outcomes on a withheld dataset and compared performance to a weight-alone alternative using volume under surface (VUS) (a multiclass version of AUC).ResultsWe observed statistically significant associations between sub- and supra-therapeutic aPTT, race, ICU type, gender, heparin dose, age and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores with mean validation AUC of 0.78 and 0.79 respectively. Our final model improved outcome classification over the weight-alone alternative, with VUS values of 0.48 vs. 0.42.ConclusionsThis work represents an important step in the secondary use of health data in developing models to optimize drug dosing. The next step would be evaluating whether this approach indeed achieves target aPTT more reliably than the current weight-based heparin dosing in a randomized controlled trial.

[1]  Christopher P Cannon,et al.  The use and limitations of unfractionated heparin. , 2010, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[2]  A. Winterstein,et al.  Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Versus Antifactor Xa Heparin Assay in Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin by Continuous Intravenous Infusion , 2011, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[3]  David J. Stone,et al.  "Big data" in the intensive care unit. Closing the data loop. , 2013, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  V. Fuster,et al.  Guide to Anticoagulant Therapy: Heparin: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association , 2001, Circulation.

[5]  J. Hirsh,et al.  A standard heparin nomogram for the management of heparin therapy. , 1991, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  S Alban,et al.  Adverse effects of heparin. , 2012, Handbook of experimental pharmacology.

[7]  Nazife Baykal,et al.  Health Informatics , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[8]  J. Hirsh,et al.  Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. , 2004, Chest.

[9]  C. Steiner,et al.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. , 1998, Medical care.

[10]  Greet Van den Berghe,et al.  Impact of a computer-generated alert system on the quality of tight glycemic control , 2011, Intensive Care Medicine.

[11]  T. H. Kyaw,et al.  Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II: A public-access intensive care unit database* , 2011, Critical care medicine.

[12]  José Hernández-Orallo,et al.  Volume under the ROC Surface for Multi-class Problems , 2003, ECML.

[13]  K. Alexander,et al.  Unfractionated heparin dosing and risk of major bleeding in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2008, American heart journal.

[14]  P. Austin,et al.  A Modification of the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measures Into a Point System for Hospital Death Using Administrative Data , 2009, Medical care.

[15]  Robert Raschke,et al.  The Weight-based Heparin Dosing Nomogram Compared with a Standard Care Nomogram , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  P. Metnitz,et al.  Coagulation Day 2010: an Austrian survey on the routine of thromboprophylaxis in intensive care , 2012, Intensive Care Medicine.

[17]  R. Raschke,et al.  The effectiveness of implementing the weight-based heparin nomogram as a practice guideline. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[18]  M. Saeed,et al.  Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care Ii (Mimic-Ii): A Public-Access Intensive Care Unit Database , 2011 .

[19]  W. Geerts,et al.  Anticoagulant Use in Patients with Chronic Renal Impairment , 2005, American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions.

[20]  J. Bakker,et al.  A computer program for interpreting pulmonary artery catheterization data: results of the European HEMODYN Resident Study , 2003, Intensive Care Medicine.

[21]  R. Califf,et al.  The Determinants of Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time, Relation of Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time to Clinical Outcomes, and Optimal Dosing Regimens for Heparin Treated Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Review of GUSTO-IIb , 2002, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.