A Psychological Approach to Human Voluntary Movements

Abstract The author argues that movements are planned, executed, and stored in memory as perceptible events, without regard to efferent patterns. Spontaneous bimanual coordination phenomena are hypothesized to originate on a perceptual-cognitive level, with the muscles automatically tuned in service to preferred perceptible movement properties. The perceptual-cognitive system is hypothesized to control skilled complex movements as well. In perceptual-cognitive control, the full potential of the perceptual-cognitive system could be exploited. Thus, movements could be enormously flexible, with a strong potential for improvisation and creativity. An effective representation might be organized in a surprisingly sparse and economic way. In sum, the author argues that a psychological approach is most promising as a possible unifying perspective for understanding human voluntary movements.

[1]  Will Spijkers,et al.  The time course of cross-talk during the simultaneous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Richard G. Carson,et al.  Governing Coordination. Why do Muscles Matter , 2004 .

[3]  W Spijkers,et al.  Specification of movement amplitudes for the left and right hands: evidence for transient parametric coupling from overlapping-task performance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  V Bruce,et al.  Configural Features in the Context of Upright and Inverted Faces , 2001, Perception.

[5]  J. Kelso,et al.  The informational character of self-organized coordination dynamics , 1994 .

[6]  Elliot Saltzman,et al.  Dynamics and coordinate systems in skilled sensorimotor activity , 1996 .

[7]  W. Prinz A common-coding approach to perception and action , 1990 .

[8]  Joachim Hoffmann,et al.  Anticipatory Behavioral Control , 2003, ABiALS.

[9]  Daniel Cattaert,et al.  Simulating a neural cross-talk model for between-hand interference during bimanual circle drawing , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997, Complex.

[11]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Dissociation of Spatial and Temporal Coupling in the Bimanual Movements of Callosotomy Patients , 1996 .

[12]  A. Hough Pride and a Daily Marathon , 1992 .

[13]  D. Norman Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[14]  A. Opstal Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[15]  Hermann Lotze Medicinische Psychologie, oder, Physiologie der Seele , 2006 .

[16]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  The Cerebellum and Event Timing , 2002, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  R. H. Wimmers,et al.  Phase transitions in rhythmic tracking movements: A case of unilateral coupling , 1992 .

[18]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[19]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Direction information coordinated via the posterior third of the corpus callosum during bimanual movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  Spatial Conceptual Influences on the Coordination of Bimanual Actions: When a Dual Task Becomes a Single Task , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  R. M. Gaze Dynamic patterns , 1975, Nature.

[22]  D. Rosenbaum Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  J. Kelso Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[24]  H Heuer,et al.  Structural constraints on bimanual movements , 1993, Psychological research.

[25]  Franz Mechsner,et al.  Do muscles matter for coordinated action? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Bimanual interference associated with the selection of movement targets , 2003 .

[27]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  R. Ivry,et al.  Moving to Directly Cued Locations Abolishes Spatial Interference During Bimanual Actions , 2001, Psychological science.

[29]  J. S. Scott Kelso,et al.  Haptic information stabilizes and destabilizes coordination dynamics , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[31]  R. Ivry,et al.  A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective on Bimanual Coordination and Interference , 2004 .

[32]  L. Cohen,et al.  Synchronous Bimanual Movements Performed by Homologous and Non-Homologous Muscles , 1971, Perceptual and motor skills.

[33]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: specification interference as revealed by reaction time , 1997 .

[34]  J. Kelso,et al.  Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  D. Rosenbaum The Movement Precuing Technique: Assumptions, Applications, and Extensions , 1983 .

[36]  B. Hommel Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[37]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Static and Phasic Cross-Talk Effects in Discrete Bimanual Reversal Movements , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[39]  T. Schack,et al.  Representation of motor skills in human long-term memory , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[40]  W. Prinz,et al.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination , 2001, Nature.

[41]  R. Schmidt,et al.  A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  S. Swinnen Intermanual coordination: From behavioural principles to neural-network interactions , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[45]  M. Lévesque Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[46]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Evaluating the Dynamics of Unintended Interpersonal Coordination , 1997 .

[47]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  Reaction time methods in the study of motor programming: the precuing of hand, digit, and duration. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[48]  W. Köhler Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology , 1970 .

[49]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  R. Ivry,et al.  Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal uncoupling during continuous bimanual movements , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Richard G. Carson,et al.  Neuromuscular-skeletal constraints upon the dynamics of perception-action coupling , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Jeffery J. Summers,et al.  Practice effects on the coordination of the two hands in a bimanual tapping task , 1993 .

[53]  H. Haken,et al.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[54]  Stephen M. Highstein,et al.  The cerebellum : recent developments in cerebellar research , 2002 .